Generation C: Childhood, code, and creativity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Children today have a special relationship to technology, one that the law is unprepared to address. Four conflicting legal paradigms of childhood are visible among the four bodies of law that control digital spaces-those of contract, copyright, free speech, and data privacy/information security-and the tension among these paradigms is becoming increasingly unsustainable. As online business models become progressively more data intensive, the "breathing room" that childhood has been afforded traditionally is eroding. Using the work of Erving Goffman and creativity theorists, this Article argues that particularly in digital commercial contexts, a legal paradigm of childhood is needed that simultaneously focuses on childhood privacy and creating a space for creative tinkering leading to entrepreneurship in adulthood. In this vein, this Article advocates a twofronged approach to digital childhood: first, that a strong version of the minority capacity doctrine be adopted for contracts in digital spaces, and, second, that a childhood exception be crafted in copyright law.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1979-2030
Number of pages52
JournalNotre Dame Law Review
Volume87
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Fingerprint

creativity
childhood
paradigm
privacy
Law
entrepreneurship
adulthood
doctrine
minority

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Cite this

@article{3cd5a0a0191e40f9a3a723c1ab47cc23,
title = "Generation C: Childhood, code, and creativity",
abstract = "Children today have a special relationship to technology, one that the law is unprepared to address. Four conflicting legal paradigms of childhood are visible among the four bodies of law that control digital spaces-those of contract, copyright, free speech, and data privacy/information security-and the tension among these paradigms is becoming increasingly unsustainable. As online business models become progressively more data intensive, the {"}breathing room{"} that childhood has been afforded traditionally is eroding. Using the work of Erving Goffman and creativity theorists, this Article argues that particularly in digital commercial contexts, a legal paradigm of childhood is needed that simultaneously focuses on childhood privacy and creating a space for creative tinkering leading to entrepreneurship in adulthood. In this vein, this Article advocates a twofronged approach to digital childhood: first, that a strong version of the minority capacity doctrine be adopted for contracts in digital spaces, and, second, that a childhood exception be crafted in copyright law.",
author = "Matzvyshyn, {Andrea M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "1979--2030",
journal = "Notre Dame Law Review",
issn = "0745-3515",
publisher = "Notre Dame Law School",
number = "5",

}

Generation C : Childhood, code, and creativity. / Matzvyshyn, Andrea M.

In: Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 5, 01.06.2012, p. 1979-2030.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generation C

T2 - Childhood, code, and creativity

AU - Matzvyshyn, Andrea M.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Children today have a special relationship to technology, one that the law is unprepared to address. Four conflicting legal paradigms of childhood are visible among the four bodies of law that control digital spaces-those of contract, copyright, free speech, and data privacy/information security-and the tension among these paradigms is becoming increasingly unsustainable. As online business models become progressively more data intensive, the "breathing room" that childhood has been afforded traditionally is eroding. Using the work of Erving Goffman and creativity theorists, this Article argues that particularly in digital commercial contexts, a legal paradigm of childhood is needed that simultaneously focuses on childhood privacy and creating a space for creative tinkering leading to entrepreneurship in adulthood. In this vein, this Article advocates a twofronged approach to digital childhood: first, that a strong version of the minority capacity doctrine be adopted for contracts in digital spaces, and, second, that a childhood exception be crafted in copyright law.

AB - Children today have a special relationship to technology, one that the law is unprepared to address. Four conflicting legal paradigms of childhood are visible among the four bodies of law that control digital spaces-those of contract, copyright, free speech, and data privacy/information security-and the tension among these paradigms is becoming increasingly unsustainable. As online business models become progressively more data intensive, the "breathing room" that childhood has been afforded traditionally is eroding. Using the work of Erving Goffman and creativity theorists, this Article argues that particularly in digital commercial contexts, a legal paradigm of childhood is needed that simultaneously focuses on childhood privacy and creating a space for creative tinkering leading to entrepreneurship in adulthood. In this vein, this Article advocates a twofronged approach to digital childhood: first, that a strong version of the minority capacity doctrine be adopted for contracts in digital spaces, and, second, that a childhood exception be crafted in copyright law.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867840280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867840280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84867840280

VL - 87

SP - 1979

EP - 2030

JO - Notre Dame Law Review

JF - Notre Dame Law Review

SN - 0745-3515

IS - 5

ER -