Generational differences in cohabitation and marriage in the US

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We use data from pooled 2000 to 2004 current population surveys (CPSs) to examine generational differences in cohabitation and marriage among men and women ages 20-34 in the US. Consistent with our expectation and in line with assimilation theory, levels of cohabitation rise across succeeding generations. In contrast, generational differences in marriage follow a curvilinear pattern such that those in the second generation are least likely to be married, which supports some contemporary extensions of assimilation theory. These patterns persist across education groups, and tend to hold across racial and ethnic groups, too, although among women, the predicted percentages cohabiting across generations vary widely by race-ethnicity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-550
Number of pages20
JournalPopulation Research and Policy Review
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 6 2008

Fingerprint

cohabitation
marriage
assimilation
group education
ethnic group
ethnicity
education
woman

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Demography
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{a67a4d7fa42f42faa6339a557d3ad5d8,
title = "Generational differences in cohabitation and marriage in the US",
abstract = "We use data from pooled 2000 to 2004 current population surveys (CPSs) to examine generational differences in cohabitation and marriage among men and women ages 20-34 in the US. Consistent with our expectation and in line with assimilation theory, levels of cohabitation rise across succeeding generations. In contrast, generational differences in marriage follow a curvilinear pattern such that those in the second generation are least likely to be married, which supports some contemporary extensions of assimilation theory. These patterns persist across education groups, and tend to hold across racial and ethnic groups, too, although among women, the predicted percentages cohabiting across generations vary widely by race-ethnicity.",
author = "Brown, {Susan L.} and {Van Hook}, {Jennifer Lynne} and Glick, {Jennifer Elyse}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11113-008-9088-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "531--550",
journal = "Population Research and Policy Review",
issn = "0167-5923",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

Generational differences in cohabitation and marriage in the US. / Brown, Susan L.; Van Hook, Jennifer Lynne; Glick, Jennifer Elyse.

In: Population Research and Policy Review, Vol. 27, No. 5, 06.06.2008, p. 531-550.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generational differences in cohabitation and marriage in the US

AU - Brown, Susan L.

AU - Van Hook, Jennifer Lynne

AU - Glick, Jennifer Elyse

PY - 2008/6/6

Y1 - 2008/6/6

N2 - We use data from pooled 2000 to 2004 current population surveys (CPSs) to examine generational differences in cohabitation and marriage among men and women ages 20-34 in the US. Consistent with our expectation and in line with assimilation theory, levels of cohabitation rise across succeeding generations. In contrast, generational differences in marriage follow a curvilinear pattern such that those in the second generation are least likely to be married, which supports some contemporary extensions of assimilation theory. These patterns persist across education groups, and tend to hold across racial and ethnic groups, too, although among women, the predicted percentages cohabiting across generations vary widely by race-ethnicity.

AB - We use data from pooled 2000 to 2004 current population surveys (CPSs) to examine generational differences in cohabitation and marriage among men and women ages 20-34 in the US. Consistent with our expectation and in line with assimilation theory, levels of cohabitation rise across succeeding generations. In contrast, generational differences in marriage follow a curvilinear pattern such that those in the second generation are least likely to be married, which supports some contemporary extensions of assimilation theory. These patterns persist across education groups, and tend to hold across racial and ethnic groups, too, although among women, the predicted percentages cohabiting across generations vary widely by race-ethnicity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50849097842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50849097842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11113-008-9088-3

DO - 10.1007/s11113-008-9088-3

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 531

EP - 550

JO - Population Research and Policy Review

JF - Population Research and Policy Review

SN - 0167-5923

IS - 5

ER -