Genetics, race, and crime: An audience study exploring the bell curve and book reviews

Evelyn Ramsey, Paul J. Achter, Celeste M. Condit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay employs a qualitative and quantitative audience study to explore the reception of racially controversial books, such as The Bell Curve, and their dominantly negative reviews in the popular press. Findings do not support the hypothesis that reviews increase racism by recirculating racist views under cover of disapprobrium. Instead, responses suggest that audience members can incorporate components of both genetic and environmental accounts to their prior views. Thus, relative acceptance of genetic vs. environmental accounts of human difference did not correlate with racist attitudes; rather those whites who had strong negative affect toward persons of other races appropriated both genetic and environmental accounts to bolster their racism, while both blacks and whites with more egalitarian attitudes were able to incorporate genetic accounts into their schemas. We conclude that the agenda setting effects of the book and its reviews may have encouraged a less than ideal stasis point in the debate, focusing the debate on nature vs. nurture as causative agents for individuals rather than focusing on issues of individual vs. social responsibility. We suggest further exploration of the functioning of popular book reviews and of audience interpretations of popular reception of mass mediated arguments about race.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages22
JournalCritical Studies in Media Communication
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

book review
Crime
offense
racism
Ministry of State Security (GDR)
popular press
social responsibility
acceptance
interpretation
human being
Genetics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication

Cite this

@article{a30c8188303748189033209e92ed136d,
title = "Genetics, race, and crime: An audience study exploring the bell curve and book reviews",
abstract = "This essay employs a qualitative and quantitative audience study to explore the reception of racially controversial books, such as The Bell Curve, and their dominantly negative reviews in the popular press. Findings do not support the hypothesis that reviews increase racism by recirculating racist views under cover of disapprobrium. Instead, responses suggest that audience members can incorporate components of both genetic and environmental accounts to their prior views. Thus, relative acceptance of genetic vs. environmental accounts of human difference did not correlate with racist attitudes; rather those whites who had strong negative affect toward persons of other races appropriated both genetic and environmental accounts to bolster their racism, while both blacks and whites with more egalitarian attitudes were able to incorporate genetic accounts into their schemas. We conclude that the agenda setting effects of the book and its reviews may have encouraged a less than ideal stasis point in the debate, focusing the debate on nature vs. nurture as causative agents for individuals rather than focusing on issues of individual vs. social responsibility. We suggest further exploration of the functioning of popular book reviews and of audience interpretations of popular reception of mass mediated arguments about race.",
author = "Evelyn Ramsey and Achter, {Paul J.} and Condit, {Celeste M.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15295030109367121",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "1--22",
journal = "Critical Studies in Media Communication",
issn = "1529-5036",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Genetics, race, and crime : An audience study exploring the bell curve and book reviews. / Ramsey, Evelyn; Achter, Paul J.; Condit, Celeste M.

In: Critical Studies in Media Communication, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 1-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetics, race, and crime

T2 - An audience study exploring the bell curve and book reviews

AU - Ramsey, Evelyn

AU - Achter, Paul J.

AU - Condit, Celeste M.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - This essay employs a qualitative and quantitative audience study to explore the reception of racially controversial books, such as The Bell Curve, and their dominantly negative reviews in the popular press. Findings do not support the hypothesis that reviews increase racism by recirculating racist views under cover of disapprobrium. Instead, responses suggest that audience members can incorporate components of both genetic and environmental accounts to their prior views. Thus, relative acceptance of genetic vs. environmental accounts of human difference did not correlate with racist attitudes; rather those whites who had strong negative affect toward persons of other races appropriated both genetic and environmental accounts to bolster their racism, while both blacks and whites with more egalitarian attitudes were able to incorporate genetic accounts into their schemas. We conclude that the agenda setting effects of the book and its reviews may have encouraged a less than ideal stasis point in the debate, focusing the debate on nature vs. nurture as causative agents for individuals rather than focusing on issues of individual vs. social responsibility. We suggest further exploration of the functioning of popular book reviews and of audience interpretations of popular reception of mass mediated arguments about race.

AB - This essay employs a qualitative and quantitative audience study to explore the reception of racially controversial books, such as The Bell Curve, and their dominantly negative reviews in the popular press. Findings do not support the hypothesis that reviews increase racism by recirculating racist views under cover of disapprobrium. Instead, responses suggest that audience members can incorporate components of both genetic and environmental accounts to their prior views. Thus, relative acceptance of genetic vs. environmental accounts of human difference did not correlate with racist attitudes; rather those whites who had strong negative affect toward persons of other races appropriated both genetic and environmental accounts to bolster their racism, while both blacks and whites with more egalitarian attitudes were able to incorporate genetic accounts into their schemas. We conclude that the agenda setting effects of the book and its reviews may have encouraged a less than ideal stasis point in the debate, focusing the debate on nature vs. nurture as causative agents for individuals rather than focusing on issues of individual vs. social responsibility. We suggest further exploration of the functioning of popular book reviews and of audience interpretations of popular reception of mass mediated arguments about race.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039299777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0039299777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15295030109367121

DO - 10.1080/15295030109367121

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0039299777

VL - 18

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - Critical Studies in Media Communication

JF - Critical Studies in Media Communication

SN - 1529-5036

IS - 1

ER -