Geographic distribution of nonphysician clinicians who independently billed medicare for common dermatologic services in 2014

Adewole S. Adamson, Elizabeth A. Suarez, Philip McDaniel, Paul A. Leiphart, Alana Zeitany, Joslyn Sciacca Kirby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) are nonphysician clinicians (NPCs) who can deliver dermatology services. Many of these services are provided independently. Little is known about the types of services provided or where NPCs provide independent care. OBJECTIVE To examine characteristics of dermatology care for Medicare enrollees billed independently by NPCs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective review of the 2014 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File, which reflects fee-for-service payments to clinicians for services rendered to Medicare beneficiaries. Clinician location was matched with county-level demographic data from the American Community Survey, US Census Bureau. Clinicians identified using National Provider Identifier as NPs or PAs with at least 11 claims for common dermatology-associated Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System procedure codes were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Total services provided by service type category, density of dermatologists and nondermatologists who perform dermatology-related services, and geographic location by county. RESULTS Among the cohort of NPCs were 824 NPs (770 [93.5%] female) and 2083 PAs (1602 [76.9%] female) who independently billed Medicare $59 438 802 and $171 645 943, respectively. Dermatologists were affiliated with 2667 (92%) independently billing NPCs. Most payments were for non-evaluation and management services including destruction of premalignant lesions, biopsies, excisions of skin cancer, surgical repairs, flaps/grafts, and interpretation of pathologic analysis. Nurse practitioners and PAs billed for a similar distribution of service categories overall. A total of 2062 (70.9%) NPCs practiced in counties with dermatologist density of greater than 4 per 100 000 population. Only 3.0% (86) of independently billing NPCs practiced in counties without a dermatologist. Both dermatologists and NPCs were less likely to be in rural counties than in urban counties. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Nonphysician clinicians independently billed for a wide variety of complex dermatologic procedures. Most independently billing NPCs practice in counties with higher dermatologist densities, and nearly all these NPCs were affiliated with dermatologists. Further study of NPC training and integration with the dermatology discipline is an important part of addressing the changing US dermatology workforce.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-36
Number of pages7
JournalJAMA Dermatology
Volume154
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Medicare
Dermatology
Physician Assistants
Nurse Practitioners
Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System
Fee-for-Service Plans
Geographic Locations
Surgical Flaps
Skin Neoplasms
Censuses
Dermatologists
Demography
Physicians
Transplants
Biopsy
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Adamson, Adewole S. ; Suarez, Elizabeth A. ; McDaniel, Philip ; Leiphart, Paul A. ; Zeitany, Alana ; Sciacca Kirby, Joslyn. / Geographic distribution of nonphysician clinicians who independently billed medicare for common dermatologic services in 2014. In: JAMA Dermatology. 2018 ; Vol. 154, No. 1. pp. 30-36.
@article{96cac66e33574dbc9a8dcb027e303df1,
title = "Geographic distribution of nonphysician clinicians who independently billed medicare for common dermatologic services in 2014",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) are nonphysician clinicians (NPCs) who can deliver dermatology services. Many of these services are provided independently. Little is known about the types of services provided or where NPCs provide independent care. OBJECTIVE To examine characteristics of dermatology care for Medicare enrollees billed independently by NPCs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective review of the 2014 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File, which reflects fee-for-service payments to clinicians for services rendered to Medicare beneficiaries. Clinician location was matched with county-level demographic data from the American Community Survey, US Census Bureau. Clinicians identified using National Provider Identifier as NPs or PAs with at least 11 claims for common dermatology-associated Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System procedure codes were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Total services provided by service type category, density of dermatologists and nondermatologists who perform dermatology-related services, and geographic location by county. RESULTS Among the cohort of NPCs were 824 NPs (770 [93.5{\%}] female) and 2083 PAs (1602 [76.9{\%}] female) who independently billed Medicare $59 438 802 and $171 645 943, respectively. Dermatologists were affiliated with 2667 (92{\%}) independently billing NPCs. Most payments were for non-evaluation and management services including destruction of premalignant lesions, biopsies, excisions of skin cancer, surgical repairs, flaps/grafts, and interpretation of pathologic analysis. Nurse practitioners and PAs billed for a similar distribution of service categories overall. A total of 2062 (70.9{\%}) NPCs practiced in counties with dermatologist density of greater than 4 per 100 000 population. Only 3.0{\%} (86) of independently billing NPCs practiced in counties without a dermatologist. Both dermatologists and NPCs were less likely to be in rural counties than in urban counties. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Nonphysician clinicians independently billed for a wide variety of complex dermatologic procedures. Most independently billing NPCs practice in counties with higher dermatologist densities, and nearly all these NPCs were affiliated with dermatologists. Further study of NPC training and integration with the dermatology discipline is an important part of addressing the changing US dermatology workforce.",
author = "Adamson, {Adewole S.} and Suarez, {Elizabeth A.} and Philip McDaniel and Leiphart, {Paul A.} and Alana Zeitany and {Sciacca Kirby}, Joslyn",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.5039",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "154",
pages = "30--36",
journal = "JAMA Dermatology",
issn = "2168-6068",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

Geographic distribution of nonphysician clinicians who independently billed medicare for common dermatologic services in 2014. / Adamson, Adewole S.; Suarez, Elizabeth A.; McDaniel, Philip; Leiphart, Paul A.; Zeitany, Alana; Sciacca Kirby, Joslyn.

In: JAMA Dermatology, Vol. 154, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 30-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geographic distribution of nonphysician clinicians who independently billed medicare for common dermatologic services in 2014

AU - Adamson, Adewole S.

AU - Suarez, Elizabeth A.

AU - McDaniel, Philip

AU - Leiphart, Paul A.

AU - Zeitany, Alana

AU - Sciacca Kirby, Joslyn

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) are nonphysician clinicians (NPCs) who can deliver dermatology services. Many of these services are provided independently. Little is known about the types of services provided or where NPCs provide independent care. OBJECTIVE To examine characteristics of dermatology care for Medicare enrollees billed independently by NPCs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective review of the 2014 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File, which reflects fee-for-service payments to clinicians for services rendered to Medicare beneficiaries. Clinician location was matched with county-level demographic data from the American Community Survey, US Census Bureau. Clinicians identified using National Provider Identifier as NPs or PAs with at least 11 claims for common dermatology-associated Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System procedure codes were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Total services provided by service type category, density of dermatologists and nondermatologists who perform dermatology-related services, and geographic location by county. RESULTS Among the cohort of NPCs were 824 NPs (770 [93.5%] female) and 2083 PAs (1602 [76.9%] female) who independently billed Medicare $59 438 802 and $171 645 943, respectively. Dermatologists were affiliated with 2667 (92%) independently billing NPCs. Most payments were for non-evaluation and management services including destruction of premalignant lesions, biopsies, excisions of skin cancer, surgical repairs, flaps/grafts, and interpretation of pathologic analysis. Nurse practitioners and PAs billed for a similar distribution of service categories overall. A total of 2062 (70.9%) NPCs practiced in counties with dermatologist density of greater than 4 per 100 000 population. Only 3.0% (86) of independently billing NPCs practiced in counties without a dermatologist. Both dermatologists and NPCs were less likely to be in rural counties than in urban counties. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Nonphysician clinicians independently billed for a wide variety of complex dermatologic procedures. Most independently billing NPCs practice in counties with higher dermatologist densities, and nearly all these NPCs were affiliated with dermatologists. Further study of NPC training and integration with the dermatology discipline is an important part of addressing the changing US dermatology workforce.

AB - IMPORTANCE Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) are nonphysician clinicians (NPCs) who can deliver dermatology services. Many of these services are provided independently. Little is known about the types of services provided or where NPCs provide independent care. OBJECTIVE To examine characteristics of dermatology care for Medicare enrollees billed independently by NPCs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective review of the 2014 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File, which reflects fee-for-service payments to clinicians for services rendered to Medicare beneficiaries. Clinician location was matched with county-level demographic data from the American Community Survey, US Census Bureau. Clinicians identified using National Provider Identifier as NPs or PAs with at least 11 claims for common dermatology-associated Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System procedure codes were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Total services provided by service type category, density of dermatologists and nondermatologists who perform dermatology-related services, and geographic location by county. RESULTS Among the cohort of NPCs were 824 NPs (770 [93.5%] female) and 2083 PAs (1602 [76.9%] female) who independently billed Medicare $59 438 802 and $171 645 943, respectively. Dermatologists were affiliated with 2667 (92%) independently billing NPCs. Most payments were for non-evaluation and management services including destruction of premalignant lesions, biopsies, excisions of skin cancer, surgical repairs, flaps/grafts, and interpretation of pathologic analysis. Nurse practitioners and PAs billed for a similar distribution of service categories overall. A total of 2062 (70.9%) NPCs practiced in counties with dermatologist density of greater than 4 per 100 000 population. Only 3.0% (86) of independently billing NPCs practiced in counties without a dermatologist. Both dermatologists and NPCs were less likely to be in rural counties than in urban counties. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Nonphysician clinicians independently billed for a wide variety of complex dermatologic procedures. Most independently billing NPCs practice in counties with higher dermatologist densities, and nearly all these NPCs were affiliated with dermatologists. Further study of NPC training and integration with the dermatology discipline is an important part of addressing the changing US dermatology workforce.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041119405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041119405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.5039

DO - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.5039

M3 - Article

C2 - 29167867

AN - SCOPUS:85041119405

VL - 154

SP - 30

EP - 36

JO - JAMA Dermatology

JF - JAMA Dermatology

SN - 2168-6068

IS - 1

ER -