Global migration and political regime type: A democratic disadvantage

Christian Breunig, Cao Xun, Adam Luedtke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An indicator of globalization is the growing number of humans crossing national borders. In contrast to explanations for flows of goods and capital, migration research has concentrated on unilateral movements to rich democracies. This focus ignores the bilateral determinants of migration and stymies empirical and theoretical inquiry. The theoretical insights proposed here show how the regime type of both sending and receiving countries influences human migration. Specifically, democratic regimes accommodate fewer immigrants than autocracies and democracies enable emigration while autocracies prevent exit. The mechanisms for this divergence are a function of both micro-level motivations of migrants and institutional constraints on political leaders. Global bilateral migration data and a statistical method that captures the higher-order dependencies in network data are employed in this article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)825-854
Number of pages30
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

political regime
migration
regime
democracy
migration research
data network
national border
emigration
statistical method
micro level
divergence
migrant
immigrant
globalization
determinants
leader

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Breunig, Christian ; Xun, Cao ; Luedtke, Adam. / Global migration and political regime type : A democratic disadvantage. In: British Journal of Political Science. 2012 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 825-854.
@article{f32cd1ff0c694d50bfcda5a9e86f16d4,
title = "Global migration and political regime type: A democratic disadvantage",
abstract = "An indicator of globalization is the growing number of humans crossing national borders. In contrast to explanations for flows of goods and capital, migration research has concentrated on unilateral movements to rich democracies. This focus ignores the bilateral determinants of migration and stymies empirical and theoretical inquiry. The theoretical insights proposed here show how the regime type of both sending and receiving countries influences human migration. Specifically, democratic regimes accommodate fewer immigrants than autocracies and democracies enable emigration while autocracies prevent exit. The mechanisms for this divergence are a function of both micro-level motivations of migrants and institutional constraints on political leaders. Global bilateral migration data and a statistical method that captures the higher-order dependencies in network data are employed in this article.",
author = "Christian Breunig and Cao Xun and Adam Luedtke",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1017/S0007123412000051",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "825--854",
journal = "British Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0007-1234",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Global migration and political regime type : A democratic disadvantage. / Breunig, Christian; Xun, Cao; Luedtke, Adam.

In: British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 42, No. 4, 10.2012, p. 825-854.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global migration and political regime type

T2 - A democratic disadvantage

AU - Breunig, Christian

AU - Xun, Cao

AU - Luedtke, Adam

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - An indicator of globalization is the growing number of humans crossing national borders. In contrast to explanations for flows of goods and capital, migration research has concentrated on unilateral movements to rich democracies. This focus ignores the bilateral determinants of migration and stymies empirical and theoretical inquiry. The theoretical insights proposed here show how the regime type of both sending and receiving countries influences human migration. Specifically, democratic regimes accommodate fewer immigrants than autocracies and democracies enable emigration while autocracies prevent exit. The mechanisms for this divergence are a function of both micro-level motivations of migrants and institutional constraints on political leaders. Global bilateral migration data and a statistical method that captures the higher-order dependencies in network data are employed in this article.

AB - An indicator of globalization is the growing number of humans crossing national borders. In contrast to explanations for flows of goods and capital, migration research has concentrated on unilateral movements to rich democracies. This focus ignores the bilateral determinants of migration and stymies empirical and theoretical inquiry. The theoretical insights proposed here show how the regime type of both sending and receiving countries influences human migration. Specifically, democratic regimes accommodate fewer immigrants than autocracies and democracies enable emigration while autocracies prevent exit. The mechanisms for this divergence are a function of both micro-level motivations of migrants and institutional constraints on political leaders. Global bilateral migration data and a statistical method that captures the higher-order dependencies in network data are employed in this article.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869473903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869473903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0007123412000051

DO - 10.1017/S0007123412000051

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84869473903

VL - 42

SP - 825

EP - 854

JO - British Journal of Political Science

JF - British Journal of Political Science

SN - 0007-1234

IS - 4

ER -