Going Ballistic Over Missile Defenses: What Matters and Why

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Missile defenses have become a source of controversy between the United States and Russia, out of proportion to their technological capabilities and in negligence of strategic and political realities. Cooler heads should prevail. U.S. or other national missile defenses will not abolish mutual deterrence based on assured retaliation. In addition, whether defenses support or undermine deterrence is a question of political intent, not of technology determinism. U.S. missile defenses deployed in Europe, for example, might be provocateurs of Russian distrust or they might be instruments of collaborative research and development under a regime of cooperative security.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)449-473
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Phytoremediation
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Pollution
  • Plant Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Going Ballistic Over Missile Defenses: What Matters and Why'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this