Google Scholar's Coverage of the Engineering Literature 10 years Later

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 2008 Meier and Conkling first tested Google Scholar's coverage of the engineering literature against citations gathered from the Compendex database. Since that time, other studies have used the same methodology and found improvement in Google Scholar's coverage. This study uses engineering dissertations from Proquest Dissertations & Theses to create a data set of citations for the comparison of fee-based databases, Compendex and Scopus, against Google Scholar. From 1950 to 2017 Google Scholar outperformed both Compendex and Scopus in discoverability of citations in nine engineering subjects. These results have implications for collection management and information literacy program planning for librarians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-425
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Academic Librarianship
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

search engine
coverage
engineering
earning a doctorate
program planning
fee
librarian
literacy
literature
methodology
management

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{a50bb4a405b14df78433d2a1123d881f,
title = "Google Scholar's Coverage of the Engineering Literature 10 years Later",
abstract = "In 2008 Meier and Conkling first tested Google Scholar's coverage of the engineering literature against citations gathered from the Compendex database. Since that time, other studies have used the same methodology and found improvement in Google Scholar's coverage. This study uses engineering dissertations from Proquest Dissertations & Theses to create a data set of citations for the comparison of fee-based databases, Compendex and Scopus, against Google Scholar. From 1950 to 2017 Google Scholar outperformed both Compendex and Scopus in discoverability of citations in nine engineering subjects. These results have implications for collection management and information literacy program planning for librarians.",
author = "Cole, {Carmen Christina} and Davis, {Angela Rae} and Eyer, {Vanessa Lyn} and John Meier",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.acalib.2018.02.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "419--425",
journal = "Journal of Academic Librarianship",
issn = "0099-1333",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

Google Scholar's Coverage of the Engineering Literature 10 years Later. / Cole, Carmen Christina; Davis, Angela Rae; Eyer, Vanessa Lyn; Meier, John.

In: Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 419-425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Google Scholar's Coverage of the Engineering Literature 10 years Later

AU - Cole, Carmen Christina

AU - Davis, Angela Rae

AU - Eyer, Vanessa Lyn

AU - Meier, John

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - In 2008 Meier and Conkling first tested Google Scholar's coverage of the engineering literature against citations gathered from the Compendex database. Since that time, other studies have used the same methodology and found improvement in Google Scholar's coverage. This study uses engineering dissertations from Proquest Dissertations & Theses to create a data set of citations for the comparison of fee-based databases, Compendex and Scopus, against Google Scholar. From 1950 to 2017 Google Scholar outperformed both Compendex and Scopus in discoverability of citations in nine engineering subjects. These results have implications for collection management and information literacy program planning for librarians.

AB - In 2008 Meier and Conkling first tested Google Scholar's coverage of the engineering literature against citations gathered from the Compendex database. Since that time, other studies have used the same methodology and found improvement in Google Scholar's coverage. This study uses engineering dissertations from Proquest Dissertations & Theses to create a data set of citations for the comparison of fee-based databases, Compendex and Scopus, against Google Scholar. From 1950 to 2017 Google Scholar outperformed both Compendex and Scopus in discoverability of citations in nine engineering subjects. These results have implications for collection management and information literacy program planning for librarians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042861753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042861753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acalib.2018.02.013

DO - 10.1016/j.acalib.2018.02.013

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042861753

VL - 44

SP - 419

EP - 425

JO - Journal of Academic Librarianship

JF - Journal of Academic Librarianship

SN - 0099-1333

IS - 3

ER -