Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis

Douglas D. Dexter, Charles A. Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This meta-analysis reviews experimental and quasiexperimental studies in which upper-elementary, intermediate, and secondary students with learning disabilities learned from graphic organizers. Following an exhaustive search for studies meeting specified design criteria, 55 standardized mean effect sizes were extracted from 16 articles involving 808 participants. Students at levels ranging from grade 4 to grade 12 used graphic organizers to learn in core-content classes (English/reading, science, social studies, mathematics). Posttests measured near and far transfer. Across several conditions, settings, and features, the use of graphic organizers was associated with increases in vocabulary knowledge, comprehension, and inferential knowledge. Mean effect sizes varied from moderate to large based on type of measure, type of graphic organizer, and subject area. Conclusions, implications for future research, and practical recommendations are presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-72
Number of pages22
JournalLearning Disability Quarterly
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Learning Disorders
learning disability
Meta-Analysis
school grade
Students
Vocabulary
Mathematics
social studies
Reading
vocabulary
comprehension
student
mathematics
science

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{d8e1e5b495d14bafb7f46cfdbf329eca,
title = "Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "This meta-analysis reviews experimental and quasiexperimental studies in which upper-elementary, intermediate, and secondary students with learning disabilities learned from graphic organizers. Following an exhaustive search for studies meeting specified design criteria, 55 standardized mean effect sizes were extracted from 16 articles involving 808 participants. Students at levels ranging from grade 4 to grade 12 used graphic organizers to learn in core-content classes (English/reading, science, social studies, mathematics). Posttests measured near and far transfer. Across several conditions, settings, and features, the use of graphic organizers was associated with increases in vocabulary knowledge, comprehension, and inferential knowledge. Mean effect sizes varied from moderate to large based on type of measure, type of graphic organizer, and subject area. Conclusions, implications for future research, and practical recommendations are presented.",
author = "Dexter, {Douglas D.} and Hughes, {Charles A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/073194871103400104",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "51--72",
journal = "Learning Disability Quarterly",
issn = "0731-9487",
publisher = "Council for Learning Disabilities",
number = "1",

}

Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities : A meta-analysis. / Dexter, Douglas D.; Hughes, Charles A.

In: Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 51-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Dexter, Douglas D.

AU - Hughes, Charles A.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - This meta-analysis reviews experimental and quasiexperimental studies in which upper-elementary, intermediate, and secondary students with learning disabilities learned from graphic organizers. Following an exhaustive search for studies meeting specified design criteria, 55 standardized mean effect sizes were extracted from 16 articles involving 808 participants. Students at levels ranging from grade 4 to grade 12 used graphic organizers to learn in core-content classes (English/reading, science, social studies, mathematics). Posttests measured near and far transfer. Across several conditions, settings, and features, the use of graphic organizers was associated with increases in vocabulary knowledge, comprehension, and inferential knowledge. Mean effect sizes varied from moderate to large based on type of measure, type of graphic organizer, and subject area. Conclusions, implications for future research, and practical recommendations are presented.

AB - This meta-analysis reviews experimental and quasiexperimental studies in which upper-elementary, intermediate, and secondary students with learning disabilities learned from graphic organizers. Following an exhaustive search for studies meeting specified design criteria, 55 standardized mean effect sizes were extracted from 16 articles involving 808 participants. Students at levels ranging from grade 4 to grade 12 used graphic organizers to learn in core-content classes (English/reading, science, social studies, mathematics). Posttests measured near and far transfer. Across several conditions, settings, and features, the use of graphic organizers was associated with increases in vocabulary knowledge, comprehension, and inferential knowledge. Mean effect sizes varied from moderate to large based on type of measure, type of graphic organizer, and subject area. Conclusions, implications for future research, and practical recommendations are presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955852353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955852353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/073194871103400104

DO - 10.1177/073194871103400104

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:79955852353

VL - 34

SP - 51

EP - 72

JO - Learning Disability Quarterly

JF - Learning Disability Quarterly

SN - 0731-9487

IS - 1

ER -