Greasing the wheels of commerce? Corruption and foreign investment

Boliang Zhu, Weiyi Shi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There are considerable scholarly debates regarding the real consequences of corruption. Recent studies have argued that predictable corruption, in which bribers are guaranteed the delivery of government services, is less distortional and more efficiency-enhancing than arbitrary corruption in which officials engage in simple plunder. Yet the empirical evidence is mixed. By leveraging a vignette experiment embedded in an original firm survey in China, we find that overseas investors always consider corruption detrimental. There is some evidence that high-productivity and fixed-asset intensive investors might view predictable corruption more favorably than arbitrary corruption. Additionally, we find that compared to arbitrary corruption, predictable corruption is not associated with a significantly higher probability of market entry, but it increases the likelihood of majority ownership. Overall, the results provide little evidence that corruption “greases the wheels of commerce” even in a most likely case and suggest that the perceived benefits of predictable corruption are limited.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1311-1327
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume81
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

commerce
foreign investment
corruption
investor
evidence
opening up of markets
overseas
assets
productivity
firm
efficiency
China
experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{c9eadbcfdb414e4da244c54b9a34ef7d,
title = "Greasing the wheels of commerce? Corruption and foreign investment",
abstract = "There are considerable scholarly debates regarding the real consequences of corruption. Recent studies have argued that predictable corruption, in which bribers are guaranteed the delivery of government services, is less distortional and more efficiency-enhancing than arbitrary corruption in which officials engage in simple plunder. Yet the empirical evidence is mixed. By leveraging a vignette experiment embedded in an original firm survey in China, we find that overseas investors always consider corruption detrimental. There is some evidence that high-productivity and fixed-asset intensive investors might view predictable corruption more favorably than arbitrary corruption. Additionally, we find that compared to arbitrary corruption, predictable corruption is not associated with a significantly higher probability of market entry, but it increases the likelihood of majority ownership. Overall, the results provide little evidence that corruption “greases the wheels of commerce” even in a most likely case and suggest that the perceived benefits of predictable corruption are limited.",
author = "Boliang Zhu and Weiyi Shi",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/704326",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "1311--1327",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Greasing the wheels of commerce? Corruption and foreign investment. / Zhu, Boliang; Shi, Weiyi.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 81, No. 4, 01.10.2019, p. 1311-1327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Greasing the wheels of commerce? Corruption and foreign investment

AU - Zhu, Boliang

AU - Shi, Weiyi

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - There are considerable scholarly debates regarding the real consequences of corruption. Recent studies have argued that predictable corruption, in which bribers are guaranteed the delivery of government services, is less distortional and more efficiency-enhancing than arbitrary corruption in which officials engage in simple plunder. Yet the empirical evidence is mixed. By leveraging a vignette experiment embedded in an original firm survey in China, we find that overseas investors always consider corruption detrimental. There is some evidence that high-productivity and fixed-asset intensive investors might view predictable corruption more favorably than arbitrary corruption. Additionally, we find that compared to arbitrary corruption, predictable corruption is not associated with a significantly higher probability of market entry, but it increases the likelihood of majority ownership. Overall, the results provide little evidence that corruption “greases the wheels of commerce” even in a most likely case and suggest that the perceived benefits of predictable corruption are limited.

AB - There are considerable scholarly debates regarding the real consequences of corruption. Recent studies have argued that predictable corruption, in which bribers are guaranteed the delivery of government services, is less distortional and more efficiency-enhancing than arbitrary corruption in which officials engage in simple plunder. Yet the empirical evidence is mixed. By leveraging a vignette experiment embedded in an original firm survey in China, we find that overseas investors always consider corruption detrimental. There is some evidence that high-productivity and fixed-asset intensive investors might view predictable corruption more favorably than arbitrary corruption. Additionally, we find that compared to arbitrary corruption, predictable corruption is not associated with a significantly higher probability of market entry, but it increases the likelihood of majority ownership. Overall, the results provide little evidence that corruption “greases the wheels of commerce” even in a most likely case and suggest that the perceived benefits of predictable corruption are limited.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069917040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069917040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/704326

DO - 10.1086/704326

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 1311

EP - 1327

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 4

ER -