Greenhouse Gas Abatement in Norwegian Agriculture

Costs or Benefits?

David Blandford, Ivar Gaasland, Erling Vårdal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Agriculture, which currently accounts for 0.3 per cent of Norway's gross domestic product, is estimated to generate roughly 13 per cent of the country's emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Norway has proposed a reduction of 40 per cent in its total emissions in the run up to the international climate change conference in Paris in December 2015. High levels of protection mean that Norway is a closed economy as far as agriculture is concerned. Agriculture is also highly subsidised. We estimate a marginal abatement cost curve for agriculture. Since producers, consumers and taxpayers would all be affected if emissions reductions are imposed on agriculture, we calculate abatement costs in terms of national economic welfare. We find that a cut of around 30 per cent in emissions from agriculture can be achieved, without undermining the stated policy objective of ensuring a minimum supply of domestically-produced calories, by taking drained peatland out of production and restoring it to wetland. Progressing beyond a 30 per cent reduction requires a more fundamental restructuring of production away from emissions-intensive ruminants and towards less emissions-intensive crop and livestock products. Emissions reductions of over 60 per cent can be achieved with no reductions in national economic welfare, due to reductions in agricultural subsidies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-40
Number of pages7
JournalEuroChoices
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

greenhouse gas
agriculture
costs
cost
abatement cost
welfare economics
Norway
ruminant
marginal costs
Gross Domestic Product
peatland
gross domestic product
wetland
livestock
subsidy
producer
restructuring
climate change
crop
supply

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Blandford, David ; Gaasland, Ivar ; Vårdal, Erling. / Greenhouse Gas Abatement in Norwegian Agriculture : Costs or Benefits?. In: EuroChoices. 2015 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 34-40.
@article{e67308b9beb04eabb9743316292ceefe,
title = "Greenhouse Gas Abatement in Norwegian Agriculture: Costs or Benefits?",
abstract = "Agriculture, which currently accounts for 0.3 per cent of Norway's gross domestic product, is estimated to generate roughly 13 per cent of the country's emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Norway has proposed a reduction of 40 per cent in its total emissions in the run up to the international climate change conference in Paris in December 2015. High levels of protection mean that Norway is a closed economy as far as agriculture is concerned. Agriculture is also highly subsidised. We estimate a marginal abatement cost curve for agriculture. Since producers, consumers and taxpayers would all be affected if emissions reductions are imposed on agriculture, we calculate abatement costs in terms of national economic welfare. We find that a cut of around 30 per cent in emissions from agriculture can be achieved, without undermining the stated policy objective of ensuring a minimum supply of domestically-produced calories, by taking drained peatland out of production and restoring it to wetland. Progressing beyond a 30 per cent reduction requires a more fundamental restructuring of production away from emissions-intensive ruminants and towards less emissions-intensive crop and livestock products. Emissions reductions of over 60 per cent can be achieved with no reductions in national economic welfare, due to reductions in agricultural subsidies.",
author = "David Blandford and Ivar Gaasland and Erling V{\aa}rdal",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1746-692X.12089",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "34--40",
journal = "EuroChoices",
issn = "1478-0917",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Greenhouse Gas Abatement in Norwegian Agriculture : Costs or Benefits? / Blandford, David; Gaasland, Ivar; Vårdal, Erling.

In: EuroChoices, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 34-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Greenhouse Gas Abatement in Norwegian Agriculture

T2 - Costs or Benefits?

AU - Blandford, David

AU - Gaasland, Ivar

AU - Vårdal, Erling

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Agriculture, which currently accounts for 0.3 per cent of Norway's gross domestic product, is estimated to generate roughly 13 per cent of the country's emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Norway has proposed a reduction of 40 per cent in its total emissions in the run up to the international climate change conference in Paris in December 2015. High levels of protection mean that Norway is a closed economy as far as agriculture is concerned. Agriculture is also highly subsidised. We estimate a marginal abatement cost curve for agriculture. Since producers, consumers and taxpayers would all be affected if emissions reductions are imposed on agriculture, we calculate abatement costs in terms of national economic welfare. We find that a cut of around 30 per cent in emissions from agriculture can be achieved, without undermining the stated policy objective of ensuring a minimum supply of domestically-produced calories, by taking drained peatland out of production and restoring it to wetland. Progressing beyond a 30 per cent reduction requires a more fundamental restructuring of production away from emissions-intensive ruminants and towards less emissions-intensive crop and livestock products. Emissions reductions of over 60 per cent can be achieved with no reductions in national economic welfare, due to reductions in agricultural subsidies.

AB - Agriculture, which currently accounts for 0.3 per cent of Norway's gross domestic product, is estimated to generate roughly 13 per cent of the country's emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Norway has proposed a reduction of 40 per cent in its total emissions in the run up to the international climate change conference in Paris in December 2015. High levels of protection mean that Norway is a closed economy as far as agriculture is concerned. Agriculture is also highly subsidised. We estimate a marginal abatement cost curve for agriculture. Since producers, consumers and taxpayers would all be affected if emissions reductions are imposed on agriculture, we calculate abatement costs in terms of national economic welfare. We find that a cut of around 30 per cent in emissions from agriculture can be achieved, without undermining the stated policy objective of ensuring a minimum supply of domestically-produced calories, by taking drained peatland out of production and restoring it to wetland. Progressing beyond a 30 per cent reduction requires a more fundamental restructuring of production away from emissions-intensive ruminants and towards less emissions-intensive crop and livestock products. Emissions reductions of over 60 per cent can be achieved with no reductions in national economic welfare, due to reductions in agricultural subsidies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939454309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939454309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1746-692X.12089

DO - 10.1111/1746-692X.12089

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 34

EP - 40

JO - EuroChoices

JF - EuroChoices

SN - 1478-0917

IS - 2

ER -