Group potency and collective efficacy: Examining their predictive validity, level of analysis, and effects of performance feedback on future group performance

Dong I. Jung, John Joseph Sosik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study identified several important issues that may help increase the understanding of group efficacy constructs. First, it examined multiple assessment methods of collective efficacy and group potency for their predictive validity. Second, it tested their appropriate levels of analysis because this is a central issue for operationalization of the constructs. Finally, it examined how performance feedback affected members' group efficacy perceptions and subsequent performance. Data came from 31 student work groups, which performed two group decision-making tasks over 15 weeks. Results of regression analysis indicated that individual assessment had higher predictive validity than group assessment. Results of within and between analysis showed that group members developed more homogeneous perceptions of their group's efficacy over time. Results of partial least squares analysis indicated that group potency and collective efficacy mediated the relationship between initial performance feedback and subsequent group performance. Based on these results, the authors offer several theoretical and practical implications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)366-391
Number of pages26
JournalGroup and Organization Management
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2003

Fingerprint

Least-Squares Analysis
Decision Making
Regression Analysis
Students
Levels of analysis
Efficacy
Group performance
Performance feedback
Predictive validity
Collective efficacy
Group potency
Potency
Levels of Analysis
Operationalization
Work groups
Partial least squares
Group decision making
Regression analysis
Group Decision Making

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{34cae265d80748e995c61bf07d1dccac,
title = "Group potency and collective efficacy: Examining their predictive validity, level of analysis, and effects of performance feedback on future group performance",
abstract = "This study identified several important issues that may help increase the understanding of group efficacy constructs. First, it examined multiple assessment methods of collective efficacy and group potency for their predictive validity. Second, it tested their appropriate levels of analysis because this is a central issue for operationalization of the constructs. Finally, it examined how performance feedback affected members' group efficacy perceptions and subsequent performance. Data came from 31 student work groups, which performed two group decision-making tasks over 15 weeks. Results of regression analysis indicated that individual assessment had higher predictive validity than group assessment. Results of within and between analysis showed that group members developed more homogeneous perceptions of their group's efficacy over time. Results of partial least squares analysis indicated that group potency and collective efficacy mediated the relationship between initial performance feedback and subsequent group performance. Based on these results, the authors offer several theoretical and practical implications.",
author = "Jung, {Dong I.} and Sosik, {John Joseph}",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1059601102250821",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "366--391",
journal = "Group and Organization Management",
issn = "1059-6011",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group potency and collective efficacy

T2 - Examining their predictive validity, level of analysis, and effects of performance feedback on future group performance

AU - Jung, Dong I.

AU - Sosik, John Joseph

PY - 2003/9/1

Y1 - 2003/9/1

N2 - This study identified several important issues that may help increase the understanding of group efficacy constructs. First, it examined multiple assessment methods of collective efficacy and group potency for their predictive validity. Second, it tested their appropriate levels of analysis because this is a central issue for operationalization of the constructs. Finally, it examined how performance feedback affected members' group efficacy perceptions and subsequent performance. Data came from 31 student work groups, which performed two group decision-making tasks over 15 weeks. Results of regression analysis indicated that individual assessment had higher predictive validity than group assessment. Results of within and between analysis showed that group members developed more homogeneous perceptions of their group's efficacy over time. Results of partial least squares analysis indicated that group potency and collective efficacy mediated the relationship between initial performance feedback and subsequent group performance. Based on these results, the authors offer several theoretical and practical implications.

AB - This study identified several important issues that may help increase the understanding of group efficacy constructs. First, it examined multiple assessment methods of collective efficacy and group potency for their predictive validity. Second, it tested their appropriate levels of analysis because this is a central issue for operationalization of the constructs. Finally, it examined how performance feedback affected members' group efficacy perceptions and subsequent performance. Data came from 31 student work groups, which performed two group decision-making tasks over 15 weeks. Results of regression analysis indicated that individual assessment had higher predictive validity than group assessment. Results of within and between analysis showed that group members developed more homogeneous perceptions of their group's efficacy over time. Results of partial least squares analysis indicated that group potency and collective efficacy mediated the relationship between initial performance feedback and subsequent group performance. Based on these results, the authors offer several theoretical and practical implications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042827287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042827287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1059601102250821

DO - 10.1177/1059601102250821

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0042827287

VL - 28

SP - 366

EP - 391

JO - Group and Organization Management

JF - Group and Organization Management

SN - 1059-6011

IS - 3

ER -