Group threat and policy change: The spatial dynamics of prohibition politics, 1890–1919

Kenneth T. Andrews, Charles Seguin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors argue that group threat is a key driver of the adoption of new and controversial policies. Conceptualizing threat in spatial terms, they argue that group threat is activated through the joint occurrence of (1) proximity to threatening groups and (2) the population density of threatened groups. By analyzing the adoption of county and state “dry laws” banning alcohol from 1890 to 1919, they first show that prohibition victories were driven by the relative strength of supportive constituencies such as native whites and rural residents, vis-àvis opponents such as Irish, Italian, or German immigrants or Catholics. Second, they show that threat contributed to prohibition victories: counties bordering large immigrant or urban populations, which did not themselves contain similar populations, were more likely to adopt dry laws. Threat arises primarily from interactions between spatially proximate units at the local level, and therefore higher-level policy change is not reducible to the variables driving local policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)475-510
Number of pages36
JournalAmerican Journal of Sociology
Volume121
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

threat
politics
Group
immigrant
state law
urban population
population density
driver
alcohol
resident
Law
interaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{24700afd751e4d3cb0b29b9f87a0660f,
title = "Group threat and policy change: The spatial dynamics of prohibition politics, 1890–1919",
abstract = "The authors argue that group threat is a key driver of the adoption of new and controversial policies. Conceptualizing threat in spatial terms, they argue that group threat is activated through the joint occurrence of (1) proximity to threatening groups and (2) the population density of threatened groups. By analyzing the adoption of county and state “dry laws” banning alcohol from 1890 to 1919, they first show that prohibition victories were driven by the relative strength of supportive constituencies such as native whites and rural residents, vis-{\`a}vis opponents such as Irish, Italian, or German immigrants or Catholics. Second, they show that threat contributed to prohibition victories: counties bordering large immigrant or urban populations, which did not themselves contain similar populations, were more likely to adopt dry laws. Threat arises primarily from interactions between spatially proximate units at the local level, and therefore higher-level policy change is not reducible to the variables driving local policy.",
author = "Andrews, {Kenneth T.} and Charles Seguin",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/682134",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "475--510",
journal = "American Journal of Sociology",
issn = "0002-9602",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "2",

}

Group threat and policy change : The spatial dynamics of prohibition politics, 1890–1919. / Andrews, Kenneth T.; Seguin, Charles.

In: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 121, No. 2, 01.09.2015, p. 475-510.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group threat and policy change

T2 - The spatial dynamics of prohibition politics, 1890–1919

AU - Andrews, Kenneth T.

AU - Seguin, Charles

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - The authors argue that group threat is a key driver of the adoption of new and controversial policies. Conceptualizing threat in spatial terms, they argue that group threat is activated through the joint occurrence of (1) proximity to threatening groups and (2) the population density of threatened groups. By analyzing the adoption of county and state “dry laws” banning alcohol from 1890 to 1919, they first show that prohibition victories were driven by the relative strength of supportive constituencies such as native whites and rural residents, vis-àvis opponents such as Irish, Italian, or German immigrants or Catholics. Second, they show that threat contributed to prohibition victories: counties bordering large immigrant or urban populations, which did not themselves contain similar populations, were more likely to adopt dry laws. Threat arises primarily from interactions between spatially proximate units at the local level, and therefore higher-level policy change is not reducible to the variables driving local policy.

AB - The authors argue that group threat is a key driver of the adoption of new and controversial policies. Conceptualizing threat in spatial terms, they argue that group threat is activated through the joint occurrence of (1) proximity to threatening groups and (2) the population density of threatened groups. By analyzing the adoption of county and state “dry laws” banning alcohol from 1890 to 1919, they first show that prohibition victories were driven by the relative strength of supportive constituencies such as native whites and rural residents, vis-àvis opponents such as Irish, Italian, or German immigrants or Catholics. Second, they show that threat contributed to prohibition victories: counties bordering large immigrant or urban populations, which did not themselves contain similar populations, were more likely to adopt dry laws. Threat arises primarily from interactions between spatially proximate units at the local level, and therefore higher-level policy change is not reducible to the variables driving local policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943638156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943638156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/682134

DO - 10.1086/682134

M3 - Article

C2 - 26594715

AN - SCOPUS:84943638156

VL - 121

SP - 475

EP - 510

JO - American Journal of Sociology

JF - American Journal of Sociology

SN - 0002-9602

IS - 2

ER -