Growth effects of foreign and domestic investment

Glenn A. Firebaugh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

149 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past few years, numerous studies in sociology have concluded that foreign investment harms poor nations. These studies have focused on the coefficient for foreign capital stock, controlling for "flow ' (new investment), and - defying logic - have inferred that a negative coefficient for stock reflects "dependency effects' that retard economic growth. Since capital stock is the denominator for investment rate, the greater the stock, the lower the investment rate, for a given level of new investment. Hence, the negative coefficient for capital stock found in dependency studies indicates a beneficial investment effect, not a harmful effect. This point is demonstrated by reanalysis of the data used in dependency studies. In these data, foreign investment spurs growth. Earlier analysts have concluded otherwise only because their conclusions have belied their findings. -Author

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-130
Number of pages26
JournalAmerican Journal of Sociology
Volume98
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

foreign investment
sociology
economic growth

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Firebaugh, Glenn A. / Growth effects of foreign and domestic investment. In: American Journal of Sociology. 1992 ; Vol. 98, No. 1. pp. 105-130.
@article{4172a7bfa4f043128f8e3e1aaf0da743,
title = "Growth effects of foreign and domestic investment",
abstract = "Over the past few years, numerous studies in sociology have concluded that foreign investment harms poor nations. These studies have focused on the coefficient for foreign capital stock, controlling for {"}flow ' (new investment), and - defying logic - have inferred that a negative coefficient for stock reflects {"}dependency effects' that retard economic growth. Since capital stock is the denominator for investment rate, the greater the stock, the lower the investment rate, for a given level of new investment. Hence, the negative coefficient for capital stock found in dependency studies indicates a beneficial investment effect, not a harmful effect. This point is demonstrated by reanalysis of the data used in dependency studies. In these data, foreign investment spurs growth. Earlier analysts have concluded otherwise only because their conclusions have belied their findings. -Author",
author = "Firebaugh, {Glenn A.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/229970",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "105--130",
journal = "American Journal of Sociology",
issn = "0002-9602",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "1",

}

Growth effects of foreign and domestic investment. / Firebaugh, Glenn A.

In: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 98, No. 1, 01.01.1992, p. 105-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Growth effects of foreign and domestic investment

AU - Firebaugh, Glenn A.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Over the past few years, numerous studies in sociology have concluded that foreign investment harms poor nations. These studies have focused on the coefficient for foreign capital stock, controlling for "flow ' (new investment), and - defying logic - have inferred that a negative coefficient for stock reflects "dependency effects' that retard economic growth. Since capital stock is the denominator for investment rate, the greater the stock, the lower the investment rate, for a given level of new investment. Hence, the negative coefficient for capital stock found in dependency studies indicates a beneficial investment effect, not a harmful effect. This point is demonstrated by reanalysis of the data used in dependency studies. In these data, foreign investment spurs growth. Earlier analysts have concluded otherwise only because their conclusions have belied their findings. -Author

AB - Over the past few years, numerous studies in sociology have concluded that foreign investment harms poor nations. These studies have focused on the coefficient for foreign capital stock, controlling for "flow ' (new investment), and - defying logic - have inferred that a negative coefficient for stock reflects "dependency effects' that retard economic growth. Since capital stock is the denominator for investment rate, the greater the stock, the lower the investment rate, for a given level of new investment. Hence, the negative coefficient for capital stock found in dependency studies indicates a beneficial investment effect, not a harmful effect. This point is demonstrated by reanalysis of the data used in dependency studies. In these data, foreign investment spurs growth. Earlier analysts have concluded otherwise only because their conclusions have belied their findings. -Author

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026956526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026956526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/229970

DO - 10.1086/229970

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 105

EP - 130

JO - American Journal of Sociology

JF - American Journal of Sociology

SN - 0002-9602

IS - 1

ER -