Guideline familiarity predicts variation in self-reported use of routine surveillance PET/CT by physicians who treat head and neck cancer

Benjamin R. Roman, Snehal G. Patel, Marilene B. Wang, Anna M. Pou, F. Christopher Holsinger, David Myssiorek, David Goldenberg, Samuel Swisher-McClure, Alexander Lin, Jatin P. Shah, Judy A. Shea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Use of routine surveillance testing beyond guideline recommended levels is common in many oncologic disciplines, including head and neck cancer. The impact of guideline familiarity and other physician characteristics on surveillance imaging use are not well understood. Methods: A cross-sectional national survey was performed of physicians responsible for surveillance of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The primary outcome was self-reported use of routine surveillance PET/CT in asymptomatic patients. A secondary outcome was familiarity with guideline recommendations. Using multivariable regression, the impact of guideline familiarity and other physician characteristics on PET/CT use was examined. Results: Of the 502 responders, 79% endorsed ever using PET/ CT scans for routine surveillance imaging, and 39% were high imaging users (used PET/CT scans on more than half of their asymptomatic patients); 76% were familiar with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Head and Neck Cancers recommending against routine surveillance PET/CT scans. Although guideline familiarity was associated with being a low imaging user or a never-user, among those who were familiar with guidelines, 31% were nonetheless high imaging users and 73% endorsed ever using PET/CT scans. In multivariable analysis controlling for physician characteristics, guideline familiarity was the strongest predictor of PET/CT use. Conclusions: Familiarity with the NCCN Guidelines predicts self-reported routine surveillance PET/CT use among physicians who treat patients with HNSCC. However, given the observed variation and high levels of imaging even among physicians who are familiar with the guidelines, further research should examine the reasons physicians choose to use surveillance PET/CT scans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-77
Number of pages9
JournalJNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
Guidelines
Physicians
Recognition (Psychology)
Practice Guidelines
Cross-Sectional Studies
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology

Cite this

Roman, Benjamin R. ; Patel, Snehal G. ; Wang, Marilene B. ; Pou, Anna M. ; Holsinger, F. Christopher ; Myssiorek, David ; Goldenberg, David ; Swisher-McClure, Samuel ; Lin, Alexander ; Shah, Jatin P. ; Shea, Judy A. / Guideline familiarity predicts variation in self-reported use of routine surveillance PET/CT by physicians who treat head and neck cancer. In: JNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 69-77.
@article{cde773fb566e4edea065d5bda493c5d7,
title = "Guideline familiarity predicts variation in self-reported use of routine surveillance PET/CT by physicians who treat head and neck cancer",
abstract = "Background: Use of routine surveillance testing beyond guideline recommended levels is common in many oncologic disciplines, including head and neck cancer. The impact of guideline familiarity and other physician characteristics on surveillance imaging use are not well understood. Methods: A cross-sectional national survey was performed of physicians responsible for surveillance of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The primary outcome was self-reported use of routine surveillance PET/CT in asymptomatic patients. A secondary outcome was familiarity with guideline recommendations. Using multivariable regression, the impact of guideline familiarity and other physician characteristics on PET/CT use was examined. Results: Of the 502 responders, 79{\%} endorsed ever using PET/ CT scans for routine surveillance imaging, and 39{\%} were high imaging users (used PET/CT scans on more than half of their asymptomatic patients); 76{\%} were familiar with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Head and Neck Cancers recommending against routine surveillance PET/CT scans. Although guideline familiarity was associated with being a low imaging user or a never-user, among those who were familiar with guidelines, 31{\%} were nonetheless high imaging users and 73{\%} endorsed ever using PET/CT scans. In multivariable analysis controlling for physician characteristics, guideline familiarity was the strongest predictor of PET/CT use. Conclusions: Familiarity with the NCCN Guidelines predicts self-reported routine surveillance PET/CT use among physicians who treat patients with HNSCC. However, given the observed variation and high levels of imaging even among physicians who are familiar with the guidelines, further research should examine the reasons physicians choose to use surveillance PET/CT scans.",
author = "Roman, {Benjamin R.} and Patel, {Snehal G.} and Wang, {Marilene B.} and Pou, {Anna M.} and Holsinger, {F. Christopher} and David Myssiorek and David Goldenberg and Samuel Swisher-McClure and Alexander Lin and Shah, {Jatin P.} and Shea, {Judy A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.6004/jnccn.2015.0010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "69--77",
journal = "Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN",
issn = "1540-1405",
publisher = "Cold Spring Publishing LLC",
number = "1",

}

Guideline familiarity predicts variation in self-reported use of routine surveillance PET/CT by physicians who treat head and neck cancer. / Roman, Benjamin R.; Patel, Snehal G.; Wang, Marilene B.; Pou, Anna M.; Holsinger, F. Christopher; Myssiorek, David; Goldenberg, David; Swisher-McClure, Samuel; Lin, Alexander; Shah, Jatin P.; Shea, Judy A.

In: JNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 69-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guideline familiarity predicts variation in self-reported use of routine surveillance PET/CT by physicians who treat head and neck cancer

AU - Roman, Benjamin R.

AU - Patel, Snehal G.

AU - Wang, Marilene B.

AU - Pou, Anna M.

AU - Holsinger, F. Christopher

AU - Myssiorek, David

AU - Goldenberg, David

AU - Swisher-McClure, Samuel

AU - Lin, Alexander

AU - Shah, Jatin P.

AU - Shea, Judy A.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: Use of routine surveillance testing beyond guideline recommended levels is common in many oncologic disciplines, including head and neck cancer. The impact of guideline familiarity and other physician characteristics on surveillance imaging use are not well understood. Methods: A cross-sectional national survey was performed of physicians responsible for surveillance of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The primary outcome was self-reported use of routine surveillance PET/CT in asymptomatic patients. A secondary outcome was familiarity with guideline recommendations. Using multivariable regression, the impact of guideline familiarity and other physician characteristics on PET/CT use was examined. Results: Of the 502 responders, 79% endorsed ever using PET/ CT scans for routine surveillance imaging, and 39% were high imaging users (used PET/CT scans on more than half of their asymptomatic patients); 76% were familiar with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Head and Neck Cancers recommending against routine surveillance PET/CT scans. Although guideline familiarity was associated with being a low imaging user or a never-user, among those who were familiar with guidelines, 31% were nonetheless high imaging users and 73% endorsed ever using PET/CT scans. In multivariable analysis controlling for physician characteristics, guideline familiarity was the strongest predictor of PET/CT use. Conclusions: Familiarity with the NCCN Guidelines predicts self-reported routine surveillance PET/CT use among physicians who treat patients with HNSCC. However, given the observed variation and high levels of imaging even among physicians who are familiar with the guidelines, further research should examine the reasons physicians choose to use surveillance PET/CT scans.

AB - Background: Use of routine surveillance testing beyond guideline recommended levels is common in many oncologic disciplines, including head and neck cancer. The impact of guideline familiarity and other physician characteristics on surveillance imaging use are not well understood. Methods: A cross-sectional national survey was performed of physicians responsible for surveillance of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The primary outcome was self-reported use of routine surveillance PET/CT in asymptomatic patients. A secondary outcome was familiarity with guideline recommendations. Using multivariable regression, the impact of guideline familiarity and other physician characteristics on PET/CT use was examined. Results: Of the 502 responders, 79% endorsed ever using PET/ CT scans for routine surveillance imaging, and 39% were high imaging users (used PET/CT scans on more than half of their asymptomatic patients); 76% were familiar with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Head and Neck Cancers recommending against routine surveillance PET/CT scans. Although guideline familiarity was associated with being a low imaging user or a never-user, among those who were familiar with guidelines, 31% were nonetheless high imaging users and 73% endorsed ever using PET/CT scans. In multivariable analysis controlling for physician characteristics, guideline familiarity was the strongest predictor of PET/CT use. Conclusions: Familiarity with the NCCN Guidelines predicts self-reported routine surveillance PET/CT use among physicians who treat patients with HNSCC. However, given the observed variation and high levels of imaging even among physicians who are familiar with the guidelines, further research should examine the reasons physicians choose to use surveillance PET/CT scans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921534222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921534222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0010

DO - 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0010

M3 - Article

C2 - 25583771

AN - SCOPUS:84921534222

VL - 13

SP - 69

EP - 77

JO - Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN

JF - Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN

SN - 1540-1405

IS - 1

ER -