Guidelines and caveats for manipulating expectancies in experiments involving human participants

Dev Minotra, Murat Dikmen, Catherine M. Burns, Michael D. McNeese

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In a number of domains involving decision making under high time pressure, the appearance of an unexpected critical event can startle operators causing errors that may potentially lead to a chain reaction of unfavorable events. Simulating such situations in a laboratory requires overcoming several challenges tied to human responses to unexpected and rare critical events. We discuss cases of experimental studies that have incorporated simulations, critical events, interruptions, predictive displays and ecological displays involving naïve and expert participants. We spell out guidelines and caveats pertaining to training, expertise, temporal variables, critical event frequencies, scenario design, mediator and moderator variables to name a few. The guidelines and caveats may inform researchers in the design of generalizable and reproducible experiments and in the analysis of data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2015 International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2015
PublisherHuman Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc.
Pages1778-1782
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9780945289470
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Event59th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2014 - Los Angeles, United States
Duration: Oct 26 2015Oct 30 2015

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Volume2015-January
ISSN (Print)1071-1813

Other

Other59th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2014
CountryUnited States
CityLos Angeles
Period10/26/1510/30/15

Fingerprint

Display devices
Moderators
event
experiment
Decision making
Experiments
moderator
expertise
expert
scenario
decision making
simulation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cite this

Minotra, D., Dikmen, M., Burns, C. M., & McNeese, M. D. (2015). Guidelines and caveats for manipulating expectancies in experiments involving human participants. In 2015 International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2015 (pp. 1778-1782). (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; Vol. 2015-January). Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591384
Minotra, Dev ; Dikmen, Murat ; Burns, Catherine M. ; McNeese, Michael D. / Guidelines and caveats for manipulating expectancies in experiments involving human participants. 2015 International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2015. Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc., 2015. pp. 1778-1782 (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).
@inproceedings{afbd4f661aa244a1af9117f117557ddd,
title = "Guidelines and caveats for manipulating expectancies in experiments involving human participants",
abstract = "In a number of domains involving decision making under high time pressure, the appearance of an unexpected critical event can startle operators causing errors that may potentially lead to a chain reaction of unfavorable events. Simulating such situations in a laboratory requires overcoming several challenges tied to human responses to unexpected and rare critical events. We discuss cases of experimental studies that have incorporated simulations, critical events, interruptions, predictive displays and ecological displays involving na{\"i}ve and expert participants. We spell out guidelines and caveats pertaining to training, expertise, temporal variables, critical event frequencies, scenario design, mediator and moderator variables to name a few. The guidelines and caveats may inform researchers in the design of generalizable and reproducible experiments and in the analysis of data.",
author = "Dev Minotra and Murat Dikmen and Burns, {Catherine M.} and McNeese, {Michael D.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1541931215591384",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society",
publisher = "Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc.",
pages = "1778--1782",
booktitle = "2015 International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2015",
address = "United States",

}

Minotra, D, Dikmen, M, Burns, CM & McNeese, MD 2015, Guidelines and caveats for manipulating expectancies in experiments involving human participants. in 2015 International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2015. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 2015-January, Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc., pp. 1778-1782, 59th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2014, Los Angeles, United States, 10/26/15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591384

Guidelines and caveats for manipulating expectancies in experiments involving human participants. / Minotra, Dev; Dikmen, Murat; Burns, Catherine M.; McNeese, Michael D.

2015 International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2015. Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc., 2015. p. 1778-1782 (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; Vol. 2015-January).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Guidelines and caveats for manipulating expectancies in experiments involving human participants

AU - Minotra, Dev

AU - Dikmen, Murat

AU - Burns, Catherine M.

AU - McNeese, Michael D.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - In a number of domains involving decision making under high time pressure, the appearance of an unexpected critical event can startle operators causing errors that may potentially lead to a chain reaction of unfavorable events. Simulating such situations in a laboratory requires overcoming several challenges tied to human responses to unexpected and rare critical events. We discuss cases of experimental studies that have incorporated simulations, critical events, interruptions, predictive displays and ecological displays involving naïve and expert participants. We spell out guidelines and caveats pertaining to training, expertise, temporal variables, critical event frequencies, scenario design, mediator and moderator variables to name a few. The guidelines and caveats may inform researchers in the design of generalizable and reproducible experiments and in the analysis of data.

AB - In a number of domains involving decision making under high time pressure, the appearance of an unexpected critical event can startle operators causing errors that may potentially lead to a chain reaction of unfavorable events. Simulating such situations in a laboratory requires overcoming several challenges tied to human responses to unexpected and rare critical events. We discuss cases of experimental studies that have incorporated simulations, critical events, interruptions, predictive displays and ecological displays involving naïve and expert participants. We spell out guidelines and caveats pertaining to training, expertise, temporal variables, critical event frequencies, scenario design, mediator and moderator variables to name a few. The guidelines and caveats may inform researchers in the design of generalizable and reproducible experiments and in the analysis of data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981719100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981719100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1541931215591384

DO - 10.1177/1541931215591384

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84981719100

T3 - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

SP - 1778

EP - 1782

BT - 2015 International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2015

PB - Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc.

ER -

Minotra D, Dikmen M, Burns CM, McNeese MD. Guidelines and caveats for manipulating expectancies in experiments involving human participants. In 2015 International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2015. Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc. 2015. p. 1778-1782. (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591384