Haemostatic efficacy and safety of bolus and continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIIa are comparable in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing major surgery. Results from an open-label, randomized, multicenter trial

Rajiv K. Pruthi, Prasad Mathew, Leonard A. Valentino, Michael J. Sumner, Stephanie Seremetis, W. Keith Hoots, M. Elaine Eyster, David Green, W. Keith Hoots, Anne Hurlet, Barbara Konkle, Cindy Leissinger, Prasad Mathew, Rajiv K. Pruthi, Jamie E. Siegel, Leonard Valentino

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    56 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Bolus infusion (BI) recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) administration is safe and effective in the surgical management of haemophilia patients with inhibitors but has not been compared directly with continuous infusion (CI). We conducted an open-label, randomized, multicenter trial comparing the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa administered by BI or CI for the surgical management of haemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors to FVIII or FIX. Safety was compared with that of a control group of non-inhibitor patients receiving FVIII or FIX concentrates for major surgery. All inhibitor subjects received an initial bolus dose of 90 μg/kg rFVIIa and were then randomly assigned to BI (n=12) or CI (n=12). The BI group received 90 μg/kg rFVIIa every two hours (h) during surgery through day 5, then every four hours for days 6-10. The CI group received 50 μg/kg/h rFVIIa through day 5, then 25 mg/kg/h for days 6-10.The control group (n=12) received FVIII or FIX per institutional protocols. Twenty-two major surgeries included orthopedic procedures on the knee (n=13), hip (n=3), and abdominal/pelvis procedures (n=4). One patient with an autoimmune FVIII inhibitor randomized to the BI arm was excluded from efficacy analysis. Haemostatic efficacy of rFVIIa in each group was comparable: effective in 8/11 and 9/12 subjects in the BI and CI arms, respectively, and ineffective in three subjects in each arm. Serious adverse events were related to continued or increased bleeding. In conclusion, haemostatic efficacy and safety of BI and CI of rFVIIa are comparable for the surgical management of haemophilia subjects with inhibitors.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)726-732
    Number of pages7
    JournalThrombosis and Haemostasis
    Volume98
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 1 2007

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Hematology

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Haemostatic efficacy and safety of bolus and continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIIa are comparable in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing major surgery. Results from an open-label, randomized, multicenter trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Pruthi, R. K., Mathew, P., Valentino, L. A., Sumner, M. J., Seremetis, S., Hoots, W. K., Eyster, M. E., Green, D., Hoots, W. K., Hurlet, A., Konkle, B., Leissinger, C., Mathew, P., Pruthi, R. K., Siegel, J. E., & Valentino, L. (2007). Haemostatic efficacy and safety of bolus and continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIIa are comparable in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing major surgery. Results from an open-label, randomized, multicenter trial. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 98(4), 726-732. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH07-03-0198