Harnessing the uncertainty monster

Putting quantitative constraints on the intergenerational social discount rate

Stephan Lewandowsky, Mark C. Freeman, Michael Mann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is broad consensus among economists that unmitigated climate change will ultimately have adverse global economic consequences, that the costs of inaction will likely outweigh the cost of taking action, and that social planners should therefore put a price on carbon. However, there is considerable debate and uncertainty about the appropriate value of the social discount rate, that is the extent to which future damages should be discounted relative to mitigation costs incurred now. We briefly review the ethical issues surrounding the social discount rate and then report a simulation experiment that constrains the value of the discount rate by considering 4 sources of uncertainty and ambiguity: Scientific uncertainty about the extent of future warming, social uncertainty about future population and future economic development, political uncertainty about future mitigation trajectories, and ethical ambiguity about how much the welfare of future generations should be valued today. We compute a certainty-equivalent declining discount rate that accommodates all those sources of uncertainty and ambiguity. The forward (instantaneous) discount rate converges to a value near 0% by century's end and the spot (horizon) discount rate drops below 2% by 2100 and drops below previous estimates by 2070.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-166
Number of pages12
JournalGlobal and Planetary Change
Volume156
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

discount rate
mitigation
cost
economic development
warming
trajectory
damage
climate change
carbon
economics
simulation
experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Oceanography

Cite this

@article{2ba6bb99d8c049cbbfd36b67a3fe5e66,
title = "Harnessing the uncertainty monster: Putting quantitative constraints on the intergenerational social discount rate",
abstract = "There is broad consensus among economists that unmitigated climate change will ultimately have adverse global economic consequences, that the costs of inaction will likely outweigh the cost of taking action, and that social planners should therefore put a price on carbon. However, there is considerable debate and uncertainty about the appropriate value of the social discount rate, that is the extent to which future damages should be discounted relative to mitigation costs incurred now. We briefly review the ethical issues surrounding the social discount rate and then report a simulation experiment that constrains the value of the discount rate by considering 4 sources of uncertainty and ambiguity: Scientific uncertainty about the extent of future warming, social uncertainty about future population and future economic development, political uncertainty about future mitigation trajectories, and ethical ambiguity about how much the welfare of future generations should be valued today. We compute a certainty-equivalent declining discount rate that accommodates all those sources of uncertainty and ambiguity. The forward (instantaneous) discount rate converges to a value near 0{\%} by century's end and the spot (horizon) discount rate drops below 2{\%} by 2100 and drops below previous estimates by 2070.",
author = "Stephan Lewandowsky and Freeman, {Mark C.} and Michael Mann",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.03.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "156",
pages = "155--166",
journal = "Global and Planetary Change",
issn = "0921-8181",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Harnessing the uncertainty monster : Putting quantitative constraints on the intergenerational social discount rate. / Lewandowsky, Stephan; Freeman, Mark C.; Mann, Michael.

In: Global and Planetary Change, Vol. 156, 01.09.2017, p. 155-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Harnessing the uncertainty monster

T2 - Putting quantitative constraints on the intergenerational social discount rate

AU - Lewandowsky, Stephan

AU - Freeman, Mark C.

AU - Mann, Michael

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - There is broad consensus among economists that unmitigated climate change will ultimately have adverse global economic consequences, that the costs of inaction will likely outweigh the cost of taking action, and that social planners should therefore put a price on carbon. However, there is considerable debate and uncertainty about the appropriate value of the social discount rate, that is the extent to which future damages should be discounted relative to mitigation costs incurred now. We briefly review the ethical issues surrounding the social discount rate and then report a simulation experiment that constrains the value of the discount rate by considering 4 sources of uncertainty and ambiguity: Scientific uncertainty about the extent of future warming, social uncertainty about future population and future economic development, political uncertainty about future mitigation trajectories, and ethical ambiguity about how much the welfare of future generations should be valued today. We compute a certainty-equivalent declining discount rate that accommodates all those sources of uncertainty and ambiguity. The forward (instantaneous) discount rate converges to a value near 0% by century's end and the spot (horizon) discount rate drops below 2% by 2100 and drops below previous estimates by 2070.

AB - There is broad consensus among economists that unmitigated climate change will ultimately have adverse global economic consequences, that the costs of inaction will likely outweigh the cost of taking action, and that social planners should therefore put a price on carbon. However, there is considerable debate and uncertainty about the appropriate value of the social discount rate, that is the extent to which future damages should be discounted relative to mitigation costs incurred now. We briefly review the ethical issues surrounding the social discount rate and then report a simulation experiment that constrains the value of the discount rate by considering 4 sources of uncertainty and ambiguity: Scientific uncertainty about the extent of future warming, social uncertainty about future population and future economic development, political uncertainty about future mitigation trajectories, and ethical ambiguity about how much the welfare of future generations should be valued today. We compute a certainty-equivalent declining discount rate that accommodates all those sources of uncertainty and ambiguity. The forward (instantaneous) discount rate converges to a value near 0% by century's end and the spot (horizon) discount rate drops below 2% by 2100 and drops below previous estimates by 2070.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018965098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018965098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.03.007

M3 - Article

VL - 156

SP - 155

EP - 166

JO - Global and Planetary Change

JF - Global and Planetary Change

SN - 0921-8181

ER -