Harvesting Human Capital

Family Structure and Education Among Rural Youth

Daniel T. Lichter, Gretchen T. Cornwell, David Eggebeen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract Coleman's (1988) theory of family social capital provides a conceptual framework for assessing the relationship between several dimensions of family structure and school dropout rates among nonmetro‐politan youth. This paper evaluates the extent to which higher rural than urban dropout rates are attributable to spatial differences in family structure (e.g., living arrangements, family size, and early childbearing) or economic resources (e.g., poverty) and estimates the differential effects of family structure and poverty on school dropout rates in nonmetropolitan areas, suburbs, and central cities. Data are drawn from the March 1990 Current Population Survey. Results indicate that residential differences in family structure account for a relatively small part of the higher dropout rates found in rural areas. Rural youth's experience with poverty appears to matter more. The educational effects of family structure are nevertheless strong in rural areas, albeit somewhat smaller than in suburban areas, owing perhaps to compensating forms of social capital found in rural areas. The results suggest that studies of dropout behavior—in rural or urban areas—must acknowledge the potentially large role of family structure and economic resources on the educational achievement process. 1993 Rural Sociological Society

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-75
Number of pages23
JournalRural Sociology
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

family education
family structure
human capital
drop-out
rural area
poverty
social capital
family size
life situation
suburb
resources
school
economics
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Lichter, Daniel T. ; Cornwell, Gretchen T. ; Eggebeen, David. / Harvesting Human Capital : Family Structure and Education Among Rural Youth. In: Rural Sociology. 1993 ; Vol. 58, No. 1. pp. 53-75.
@article{d0134f251b5f4d31bc44d509be74ca46,
title = "Harvesting Human Capital: Family Structure and Education Among Rural Youth",
abstract = "Abstract Coleman's (1988) theory of family social capital provides a conceptual framework for assessing the relationship between several dimensions of family structure and school dropout rates among nonmetro‐politan youth. This paper evaluates the extent to which higher rural than urban dropout rates are attributable to spatial differences in family structure (e.g., living arrangements, family size, and early childbearing) or economic resources (e.g., poverty) and estimates the differential effects of family structure and poverty on school dropout rates in nonmetropolitan areas, suburbs, and central cities. Data are drawn from the March 1990 Current Population Survey. Results indicate that residential differences in family structure account for a relatively small part of the higher dropout rates found in rural areas. Rural youth's experience with poverty appears to matter more. The educational effects of family structure are nevertheless strong in rural areas, albeit somewhat smaller than in suburban areas, owing perhaps to compensating forms of social capital found in rural areas. The results suggest that studies of dropout behavior—in rural or urban areas—must acknowledge the potentially large role of family structure and economic resources on the educational achievement process. 1993 Rural Sociological Society",
author = "Lichter, {Daniel T.} and Cornwell, {Gretchen T.} and David Eggebeen",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1549-0831.1993.tb00482.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "53--75",
journal = "Rural Sociology",
issn = "0036-0112",
publisher = "Rural Sociological Society",
number = "1",

}

Harvesting Human Capital : Family Structure and Education Among Rural Youth. / Lichter, Daniel T.; Cornwell, Gretchen T.; Eggebeen, David.

In: Rural Sociology, Vol. 58, No. 1, 01.01.1993, p. 53-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Harvesting Human Capital

T2 - Family Structure and Education Among Rural Youth

AU - Lichter, Daniel T.

AU - Cornwell, Gretchen T.

AU - Eggebeen, David

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - Abstract Coleman's (1988) theory of family social capital provides a conceptual framework for assessing the relationship between several dimensions of family structure and school dropout rates among nonmetro‐politan youth. This paper evaluates the extent to which higher rural than urban dropout rates are attributable to spatial differences in family structure (e.g., living arrangements, family size, and early childbearing) or economic resources (e.g., poverty) and estimates the differential effects of family structure and poverty on school dropout rates in nonmetropolitan areas, suburbs, and central cities. Data are drawn from the March 1990 Current Population Survey. Results indicate that residential differences in family structure account for a relatively small part of the higher dropout rates found in rural areas. Rural youth's experience with poverty appears to matter more. The educational effects of family structure are nevertheless strong in rural areas, albeit somewhat smaller than in suburban areas, owing perhaps to compensating forms of social capital found in rural areas. The results suggest that studies of dropout behavior—in rural or urban areas—must acknowledge the potentially large role of family structure and economic resources on the educational achievement process. 1993 Rural Sociological Society

AB - Abstract Coleman's (1988) theory of family social capital provides a conceptual framework for assessing the relationship between several dimensions of family structure and school dropout rates among nonmetro‐politan youth. This paper evaluates the extent to which higher rural than urban dropout rates are attributable to spatial differences in family structure (e.g., living arrangements, family size, and early childbearing) or economic resources (e.g., poverty) and estimates the differential effects of family structure and poverty on school dropout rates in nonmetropolitan areas, suburbs, and central cities. Data are drawn from the March 1990 Current Population Survey. Results indicate that residential differences in family structure account for a relatively small part of the higher dropout rates found in rural areas. Rural youth's experience with poverty appears to matter more. The educational effects of family structure are nevertheless strong in rural areas, albeit somewhat smaller than in suburban areas, owing perhaps to compensating forms of social capital found in rural areas. The results suggest that studies of dropout behavior—in rural or urban areas—must acknowledge the potentially large role of family structure and economic resources on the educational achievement process. 1993 Rural Sociological Society

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027749944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027749944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1993.tb00482.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1993.tb00482.x

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 53

EP - 75

JO - Rural Sociology

JF - Rural Sociology

SN - 0036-0112

IS - 1

ER -