We introduce a new explanation for one of the most pronounced phenomena on the American business landscape in recent decades: a dramatic increase in attributions of CEO significance. Specifically, we test the possibility that America's CEOs became seen as increasingly significant because they were, in fact, increasingly significant. Employing variance partitioning methodologies on data spanning 60 years and more than 18,000 firm-years, we find that the proportion of variance in performance explained by individual CEOs, or "the CEO effect," increased substantially over the decades of study. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of this finding.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Business and International Management
- Strategy and Management