Has work replaced home as a haven? Re-examining Arlie Hochschild's Time Bind proposition with objective stress data

Sarah Damaske, Joshua M. Smyth, Matthew J. Zawadzki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using innovative data with objective and subjective measures of stress collected from 122 employed men and women, this paper tests the thesis of the Time Bind by asking whether people report lower stress levels at work than at home. The study finds consistent support for the Time Bind hypothesis when examining objective stress data: when participants were at work they had lower values of the stress hormone cortisol than when they were at home. Two variables moderated this association - income and children at home - such that the work as haven effect was stronger for those with lower incomes and no children living at home. Participants also, however, consistently reported higher subjective stress levels on work days than on non-work days, which is in direct contrast to the Time Bind hypothesis. Although our overall findings support Hochschild's hypothesis that stress levels are lower at work, it appears that combining work and home increases people's subjective experience of daily stress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)130-138
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume115
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Has work replaced home as a haven? Re-examining Arlie Hochschild's Time Bind proposition with objective stress data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this