Health communication, genetic determinism, and perceived control: The roles of beliefs about susceptibility and severity versus disease essentialism

Roxanne Parrott, Mary L. Kahl, Khadidiatou Ndiaye, Tara Traeder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research examined the lay public's beliefs about genes and health that might be labeled deterministic. The goals of this research were to sort through the divergent and contested meanings of genetic determinism in an effort to suggest directions for public health genomic communication. A survey conducted in community-based settings of 717 participants included 267 who self-reported race as African American and 450 who self-reported race as Caucasian American. The survey results revealed that the structure of genetic determinism included 2 belief sets. One set aligned with perceived threat, encompassing susceptibility and severity beliefs linked to genes and health. The other set represents beliefs about biological essentialism linked to the role of genes for health. These concepts were found to be modestly positively related. Threat beliefs predicted perceived control over genes. Public health efforts to communicate about genes and health should consider effects of these messages for (a) perceived threat relating to susceptibility and severity and (b) perceptions of disease essentialism. Perceived threat may enhance motivation to act in health protective ways, whereas disease essentialist beliefs may contribute to a loss of motivation associated with control over health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)762-778
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Health Communication
Volume17
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2012

Fingerprint

Genetic Determinism
Health Communication
determinism
Health
Disease
Genes
communication
Communication
health
threat
Public health
Motivation
Public Health
public health
Caucasian
Research
African Americans

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{749d52c713ad449f9e50a035a23b94b9,
title = "Health communication, genetic determinism, and perceived control: The roles of beliefs about susceptibility and severity versus disease essentialism",
abstract = "This research examined the lay public's beliefs about genes and health that might be labeled deterministic. The goals of this research were to sort through the divergent and contested meanings of genetic determinism in an effort to suggest directions for public health genomic communication. A survey conducted in community-based settings of 717 participants included 267 who self-reported race as African American and 450 who self-reported race as Caucasian American. The survey results revealed that the structure of genetic determinism included 2 belief sets. One set aligned with perceived threat, encompassing susceptibility and severity beliefs linked to genes and health. The other set represents beliefs about biological essentialism linked to the role of genes for health. These concepts were found to be modestly positively related. Threat beliefs predicted perceived control over genes. Public health efforts to communicate about genes and health should consider effects of these messages for (a) perceived threat relating to susceptibility and severity and (b) perceptions of disease essentialism. Perceived threat may enhance motivation to act in health protective ways, whereas disease essentialist beliefs may contribute to a loss of motivation associated with control over health.",
author = "Roxanne Parrott and Kahl, {Mary L.} and Khadidiatou Ndiaye and Tara Traeder",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10810730.2012.677301",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "762--778",
journal = "Journal of Health Communication",
issn = "1081-0730",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

Health communication, genetic determinism, and perceived control : The roles of beliefs about susceptibility and severity versus disease essentialism. / Parrott, Roxanne; Kahl, Mary L.; Ndiaye, Khadidiatou; Traeder, Tara.

In: Journal of Health Communication, Vol. 17, No. 7, 01.08.2012, p. 762-778.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health communication, genetic determinism, and perceived control

T2 - The roles of beliefs about susceptibility and severity versus disease essentialism

AU - Parrott, Roxanne

AU - Kahl, Mary L.

AU - Ndiaye, Khadidiatou

AU - Traeder, Tara

PY - 2012/8/1

Y1 - 2012/8/1

N2 - This research examined the lay public's beliefs about genes and health that might be labeled deterministic. The goals of this research were to sort through the divergent and contested meanings of genetic determinism in an effort to suggest directions for public health genomic communication. A survey conducted in community-based settings of 717 participants included 267 who self-reported race as African American and 450 who self-reported race as Caucasian American. The survey results revealed that the structure of genetic determinism included 2 belief sets. One set aligned with perceived threat, encompassing susceptibility and severity beliefs linked to genes and health. The other set represents beliefs about biological essentialism linked to the role of genes for health. These concepts were found to be modestly positively related. Threat beliefs predicted perceived control over genes. Public health efforts to communicate about genes and health should consider effects of these messages for (a) perceived threat relating to susceptibility and severity and (b) perceptions of disease essentialism. Perceived threat may enhance motivation to act in health protective ways, whereas disease essentialist beliefs may contribute to a loss of motivation associated with control over health.

AB - This research examined the lay public's beliefs about genes and health that might be labeled deterministic. The goals of this research were to sort through the divergent and contested meanings of genetic determinism in an effort to suggest directions for public health genomic communication. A survey conducted in community-based settings of 717 participants included 267 who self-reported race as African American and 450 who self-reported race as Caucasian American. The survey results revealed that the structure of genetic determinism included 2 belief sets. One set aligned with perceived threat, encompassing susceptibility and severity beliefs linked to genes and health. The other set represents beliefs about biological essentialism linked to the role of genes for health. These concepts were found to be modestly positively related. Threat beliefs predicted perceived control over genes. Public health efforts to communicate about genes and health should consider effects of these messages for (a) perceived threat relating to susceptibility and severity and (b) perceptions of disease essentialism. Perceived threat may enhance motivation to act in health protective ways, whereas disease essentialist beliefs may contribute to a loss of motivation associated with control over health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864856860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864856860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10810730.2012.677301

DO - 10.1080/10810730.2012.677301

M3 - Article

C2 - 22574711

AN - SCOPUS:84864856860

VL - 17

SP - 762

EP - 778

JO - Journal of Health Communication

JF - Journal of Health Communication

SN - 1081-0730

IS - 7

ER -