Health insurance for Americans approaching age sixty-five: An analysis of options for incremental reform

Pamela Farley Short, Dennis G. Shea, M. Paige Powell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides a systematic evaluation of the options for incremental health insurance reforms aimed at older Americans nearing age sixty-five. It presents three basic arguments for giving special consideration to this age group: (1) early retirement and its effect on access to employer insurance; (2) changes in health and health care expenses associated with increasing age; (3) the vulnerability to unexpected economic or health "shocks" that will affect people throughout their retirement. The analysis of policy options begins by specifying criteria for evaluating alternative approaches to reform. The proposed criteria emphasize that reforms for this age group should be designed to fit with other financial plans and decisions made during such a transitional stage of life. Policy options should be judged according to fundamental goals such as equity and efficiency, not simply ranked according to the number of uninsured who will gain coverage. After offering a comprehensive catalog and evaluation of available options, the analysis identifies and discusses a preferred approach - which preserves choices while offering universal and subsidized access to Medicare before age sixty-five.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-76
Number of pages36
JournalJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2003

Fingerprint

Retirement
Health Insurance
Age Groups
Policy Making
Health
Medicare
Insurance
Shock
Economics
Delivery of Health Care

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{3016b2bcb8054e128810d136690046b1,
title = "Health insurance for Americans approaching age sixty-five: An analysis of options for incremental reform",
abstract = "This article provides a systematic evaluation of the options for incremental health insurance reforms aimed at older Americans nearing age sixty-five. It presents three basic arguments for giving special consideration to this age group: (1) early retirement and its effect on access to employer insurance; (2) changes in health and health care expenses associated with increasing age; (3) the vulnerability to unexpected economic or health {"}shocks{"} that will affect people throughout their retirement. The analysis of policy options begins by specifying criteria for evaluating alternative approaches to reform. The proposed criteria emphasize that reforms for this age group should be designed to fit with other financial plans and decisions made during such a transitional stage of life. Policy options should be judged according to fundamental goals such as equity and efficiency, not simply ranked according to the number of uninsured who will gain coverage. After offering a comprehensive catalog and evaluation of available options, the analysis identifies and discusses a preferred approach - which preserves choices while offering universal and subsidized access to Medicare before age sixty-five.",
author = "Short, {Pamela Farley} and Shea, {Dennis G.} and Powell, {M. Paige}",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1215/03616878-28-1-41",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "41--76",
journal = "Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law",
issn = "0361-6878",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "1",

}

Health insurance for Americans approaching age sixty-five : An analysis of options for incremental reform. / Short, Pamela Farley; Shea, Dennis G.; Powell, M. Paige.

In: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.02.2003, p. 41-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health insurance for Americans approaching age sixty-five

T2 - An analysis of options for incremental reform

AU - Short, Pamela Farley

AU - Shea, Dennis G.

AU - Powell, M. Paige

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - This article provides a systematic evaluation of the options for incremental health insurance reforms aimed at older Americans nearing age sixty-five. It presents three basic arguments for giving special consideration to this age group: (1) early retirement and its effect on access to employer insurance; (2) changes in health and health care expenses associated with increasing age; (3) the vulnerability to unexpected economic or health "shocks" that will affect people throughout their retirement. The analysis of policy options begins by specifying criteria for evaluating alternative approaches to reform. The proposed criteria emphasize that reforms for this age group should be designed to fit with other financial plans and decisions made during such a transitional stage of life. Policy options should be judged according to fundamental goals such as equity and efficiency, not simply ranked according to the number of uninsured who will gain coverage. After offering a comprehensive catalog and evaluation of available options, the analysis identifies and discusses a preferred approach - which preserves choices while offering universal and subsidized access to Medicare before age sixty-five.

AB - This article provides a systematic evaluation of the options for incremental health insurance reforms aimed at older Americans nearing age sixty-five. It presents three basic arguments for giving special consideration to this age group: (1) early retirement and its effect on access to employer insurance; (2) changes in health and health care expenses associated with increasing age; (3) the vulnerability to unexpected economic or health "shocks" that will affect people throughout their retirement. The analysis of policy options begins by specifying criteria for evaluating alternative approaches to reform. The proposed criteria emphasize that reforms for this age group should be designed to fit with other financial plans and decisions made during such a transitional stage of life. Policy options should be judged according to fundamental goals such as equity and efficiency, not simply ranked according to the number of uninsured who will gain coverage. After offering a comprehensive catalog and evaluation of available options, the analysis identifies and discusses a preferred approach - which preserves choices while offering universal and subsidized access to Medicare before age sixty-five.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037299472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037299472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1215/03616878-28-1-41

DO - 10.1215/03616878-28-1-41

M3 - Article

C2 - 12705417

AN - SCOPUS:0037299472

VL - 28

SP - 41

EP - 76

JO - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

JF - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

SN - 0361-6878

IS - 1

ER -