Hepatitis E virus antigen detection as an early diagnostic marker: Report from India

Manasi Majumdar, Mini P. Singh, Sujit Pujhari, Deepak Bhatia, Y. Chawla, R. K. Ratho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is implicated in many outbreaks of viral hepatitis in the Indian subcontinent. The conventional diagnosis of such outbreaks rests on the detection of anti-HEV IgM antibodies. However, IgM antibodies develop after 4-5 days of infection. An early-diagnostic marker is imperative for timely diagnosis of the outbreak and also initiation of control measures. This study aimed to determine the use of hepatitis E virus antigen detection as an early diagnostic marker in an outbreak in comparison to anti-HEV IgM and RT-PCR analyses. Forty samples were collected during a suspected outbreak of viral hepatitis due to HEV. A total of 36 samples were positive for one or more HEV markers. The positivity for anti-HEV IgM, HEV antigen, and RT-PCR was 91.6%, 69.4%, and 47.2% respectively. RT-PCR and HEV antigen detection gave the highest positive results (100%) in the first 3 days of illness. Positive HEV PCR declined to 54% by Days 4-7, whereas HEV antigen and IgM detection were 88% and 100%, respectively. Sequencing of representative HEV samples indicated that the strains responsible for this outbreak belonged to genotype I, subtype 1a. HEV antigen was found to be an early diagnostic marker of acute infection. HEV antigen was detected in three additional cases in the early phase (1-3 days), and they had no detectable anti-HEV IgM antibodies. These three samples were also positive for HEV RNA. After Day 7, anti-HEV IgM was the main diagnostic indicator of infection. J. Med. Virol. 85:823-827, 2013.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)823-827
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Medical Virology
Volume85
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2013

Fingerprint

Hepatitis E virus
India
Antigens
Immunoglobulin M
Disease Outbreaks
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Hepatitis
Antibodies
Infection
Sick Leave

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Virology

Cite this

Majumdar, Manasi ; Singh, Mini P. ; Pujhari, Sujit ; Bhatia, Deepak ; Chawla, Y. ; Ratho, R. K. / Hepatitis E virus antigen detection as an early diagnostic marker : Report from India. In: Journal of Medical Virology. 2013 ; Vol. 85, No. 5. pp. 823-827.
@article{da4ba9dec9b343ba8e4eb7f5c747fc74,
title = "Hepatitis E virus antigen detection as an early diagnostic marker: Report from India",
abstract = "Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is implicated in many outbreaks of viral hepatitis in the Indian subcontinent. The conventional diagnosis of such outbreaks rests on the detection of anti-HEV IgM antibodies. However, IgM antibodies develop after 4-5 days of infection. An early-diagnostic marker is imperative for timely diagnosis of the outbreak and also initiation of control measures. This study aimed to determine the use of hepatitis E virus antigen detection as an early diagnostic marker in an outbreak in comparison to anti-HEV IgM and RT-PCR analyses. Forty samples were collected during a suspected outbreak of viral hepatitis due to HEV. A total of 36 samples were positive for one or more HEV markers. The positivity for anti-HEV IgM, HEV antigen, and RT-PCR was 91.6{\%}, 69.4{\%}, and 47.2{\%} respectively. RT-PCR and HEV antigen detection gave the highest positive results (100{\%}) in the first 3 days of illness. Positive HEV PCR declined to 54{\%} by Days 4-7, whereas HEV antigen and IgM detection were 88{\%} and 100{\%}, respectively. Sequencing of representative HEV samples indicated that the strains responsible for this outbreak belonged to genotype I, subtype 1a. HEV antigen was found to be an early diagnostic marker of acute infection. HEV antigen was detected in three additional cases in the early phase (1-3 days), and they had no detectable anti-HEV IgM antibodies. These three samples were also positive for HEV RNA. After Day 7, anti-HEV IgM was the main diagnostic indicator of infection. J. Med. Virol. 85:823-827, 2013.",
author = "Manasi Majumdar and Singh, {Mini P.} and Sujit Pujhari and Deepak Bhatia and Y. Chawla and Ratho, {R. K.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jmv.23529",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "823--827",
journal = "Journal of Medical Virology",
issn = "0146-6615",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Hepatitis E virus antigen detection as an early diagnostic marker : Report from India. / Majumdar, Manasi; Singh, Mini P.; Pujhari, Sujit; Bhatia, Deepak; Chawla, Y.; Ratho, R. K.

In: Journal of Medical Virology, Vol. 85, No. 5, 01.05.2013, p. 823-827.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hepatitis E virus antigen detection as an early diagnostic marker

T2 - Report from India

AU - Majumdar, Manasi

AU - Singh, Mini P.

AU - Pujhari, Sujit

AU - Bhatia, Deepak

AU - Chawla, Y.

AU - Ratho, R. K.

PY - 2013/5/1

Y1 - 2013/5/1

N2 - Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is implicated in many outbreaks of viral hepatitis in the Indian subcontinent. The conventional diagnosis of such outbreaks rests on the detection of anti-HEV IgM antibodies. However, IgM antibodies develop after 4-5 days of infection. An early-diagnostic marker is imperative for timely diagnosis of the outbreak and also initiation of control measures. This study aimed to determine the use of hepatitis E virus antigen detection as an early diagnostic marker in an outbreak in comparison to anti-HEV IgM and RT-PCR analyses. Forty samples were collected during a suspected outbreak of viral hepatitis due to HEV. A total of 36 samples were positive for one or more HEV markers. The positivity for anti-HEV IgM, HEV antigen, and RT-PCR was 91.6%, 69.4%, and 47.2% respectively. RT-PCR and HEV antigen detection gave the highest positive results (100%) in the first 3 days of illness. Positive HEV PCR declined to 54% by Days 4-7, whereas HEV antigen and IgM detection were 88% and 100%, respectively. Sequencing of representative HEV samples indicated that the strains responsible for this outbreak belonged to genotype I, subtype 1a. HEV antigen was found to be an early diagnostic marker of acute infection. HEV antigen was detected in three additional cases in the early phase (1-3 days), and they had no detectable anti-HEV IgM antibodies. These three samples were also positive for HEV RNA. After Day 7, anti-HEV IgM was the main diagnostic indicator of infection. J. Med. Virol. 85:823-827, 2013.

AB - Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is implicated in many outbreaks of viral hepatitis in the Indian subcontinent. The conventional diagnosis of such outbreaks rests on the detection of anti-HEV IgM antibodies. However, IgM antibodies develop after 4-5 days of infection. An early-diagnostic marker is imperative for timely diagnosis of the outbreak and also initiation of control measures. This study aimed to determine the use of hepatitis E virus antigen detection as an early diagnostic marker in an outbreak in comparison to anti-HEV IgM and RT-PCR analyses. Forty samples were collected during a suspected outbreak of viral hepatitis due to HEV. A total of 36 samples were positive for one or more HEV markers. The positivity for anti-HEV IgM, HEV antigen, and RT-PCR was 91.6%, 69.4%, and 47.2% respectively. RT-PCR and HEV antigen detection gave the highest positive results (100%) in the first 3 days of illness. Positive HEV PCR declined to 54% by Days 4-7, whereas HEV antigen and IgM detection were 88% and 100%, respectively. Sequencing of representative HEV samples indicated that the strains responsible for this outbreak belonged to genotype I, subtype 1a. HEV antigen was found to be an early diagnostic marker of acute infection. HEV antigen was detected in three additional cases in the early phase (1-3 days), and they had no detectable anti-HEV IgM antibodies. These three samples were also positive for HEV RNA. After Day 7, anti-HEV IgM was the main diagnostic indicator of infection. J. Med. Virol. 85:823-827, 2013.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875636992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875636992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jmv.23529

DO - 10.1002/jmv.23529

M3 - Article

C2 - 23408566

AN - SCOPUS:84875636992

VL - 85

SP - 823

EP - 827

JO - Journal of Medical Virology

JF - Journal of Medical Virology

SN - 0146-6615

IS - 5

ER -