High-latitude dynamics of atmosphere-ice-ocean interactions

Thomas Spengler, Ian A. Renfrew, Annick Terpstra, Michael Tjernström, James Screen, Ian M. Brooks, Andrew Carleton, Dmititry Chechin, Linling Chen, James Doyle, Igor Esau, Paul J. Hezel, Thomas Jung, Tsubasa Kohyama, Christof Lüpkes, Kelly E. McCusker, Tiiiina Nygård, Denis Sergeev, Matttthew D. Shupe, Harald SodemannTimo Vihma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There was recognition that including coupling between atmosphere, sea ice, and ocean can improve forecast skill across a range of time scales. Coupling must therefore be considered across a range of scales appropriate to the time scale of the forecast, from planetary-scale dynamics to subgrid-scale processes in models. It was pointed out that better knowledge is needed as to the dominant causal direction of atmosphere-ocean-ice coupling and polar-midlatitude-tropical interactions and of their physical mechanisms, including the role of the stratosphere. In addition, the effects of model biases on projections for many of the phenomena discussed are still poorly understood. Participants pointed out that further work is required to elucidate the anthropogenic contribution to sea ice trends and to better understand the character of anthropogenic changes in the large-scale atmospheric circulation. Another key message emanating from the discussion was that Arctic-midlatitude interactions are clearly two way, which complicates attribution of cause and effect. For example, Arctic amplification is itself partially a response to lower-latitude forcing. Participants suggested that future research with respect to extreme events at high latitudes should be extended to oceanography, biology, avalanches, and visibility. Furthermore, there was a general agreement to enhance stakeholder involvement with respect to polar predictability. Last, workshop participants pinpointed the importance of process-based studies to make progress on research questions where insufficient observations and/or inadequate models hamper assessment of larger temporal- and spatial-scale processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)ES179-ES182
JournalBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Volume97
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2016

Fingerprint

ice-ocean interaction
atmosphere
sea ice
timescale
ocean
avalanche
extreme event
oceanography
atmospheric circulation
visibility
stratosphere
amplification
stakeholder
ice
effect
forecast

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Spengler, T., Renfrew, I. A., Terpstra, A., Tjernström, M., Screen, J., Brooks, I. M., ... Vihma, T. (2016). High-latitude dynamics of atmosphere-ice-ocean interactions. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 97(9), ES179-ES182. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00302.1
Spengler, Thomas ; Renfrew, Ian A. ; Terpstra, Annick ; Tjernström, Michael ; Screen, James ; Brooks, Ian M. ; Carleton, Andrew ; Chechin, Dmititry ; Chen, Linling ; Doyle, James ; Esau, Igor ; Hezel, Paul J. ; Jung, Thomas ; Kohyama, Tsubasa ; Lüpkes, Christof ; McCusker, Kelly E. ; Nygård, Tiiiina ; Sergeev, Denis ; Shupe, Matttthew D. ; Sodemann, Harald ; Vihma, Timo. / High-latitude dynamics of atmosphere-ice-ocean interactions. In: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2016 ; Vol. 97, No. 9. pp. ES179-ES182.
@article{3329d80b21be49c2b520201eccb2beff,
title = "High-latitude dynamics of atmosphere-ice-ocean interactions",
abstract = "There was recognition that including coupling between atmosphere, sea ice, and ocean can improve forecast skill across a range of time scales. Coupling must therefore be considered across a range of scales appropriate to the time scale of the forecast, from planetary-scale dynamics to subgrid-scale processes in models. It was pointed out that better knowledge is needed as to the dominant causal direction of atmosphere-ocean-ice coupling and polar-midlatitude-tropical interactions and of their physical mechanisms, including the role of the stratosphere. In addition, the effects of model biases on projections for many of the phenomena discussed are still poorly understood. Participants pointed out that further work is required to elucidate the anthropogenic contribution to sea ice trends and to better understand the character of anthropogenic changes in the large-scale atmospheric circulation. Another key message emanating from the discussion was that Arctic-midlatitude interactions are clearly two way, which complicates attribution of cause and effect. For example, Arctic amplification is itself partially a response to lower-latitude forcing. Participants suggested that future research with respect to extreme events at high latitudes should be extended to oceanography, biology, avalanches, and visibility. Furthermore, there was a general agreement to enhance stakeholder involvement with respect to polar predictability. Last, workshop participants pinpointed the importance of process-based studies to make progress on research questions where insufficient observations and/or inadequate models hamper assessment of larger temporal- and spatial-scale processes.",
author = "Thomas Spengler and Renfrew, {Ian A.} and Annick Terpstra and Michael Tjernstr{\"o}m and James Screen and Brooks, {Ian M.} and Andrew Carleton and Dmititry Chechin and Linling Chen and James Doyle and Igor Esau and Hezel, {Paul J.} and Thomas Jung and Tsubasa Kohyama and Christof L{\"u}pkes and McCusker, {Kelly E.} and Tiiiina Nyg{\aa}rd and Denis Sergeev and Shupe, {Matttthew D.} and Harald Sodemann and Timo Vihma",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00302.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "ES179--ES182",
journal = "Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society",
issn = "0003-0007",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "9",

}

Spengler, T, Renfrew, IA, Terpstra, A, Tjernström, M, Screen, J, Brooks, IM, Carleton, A, Chechin, D, Chen, L, Doyle, J, Esau, I, Hezel, PJ, Jung, T, Kohyama, T, Lüpkes, C, McCusker, KE, Nygård, T, Sergeev, D, Shupe, MD, Sodemann, H & Vihma, T 2016, 'High-latitude dynamics of atmosphere-ice-ocean interactions', Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. ES179-ES182. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00302.1

High-latitude dynamics of atmosphere-ice-ocean interactions. / Spengler, Thomas; Renfrew, Ian A.; Terpstra, Annick; Tjernström, Michael; Screen, James; Brooks, Ian M.; Carleton, Andrew; Chechin, Dmititry; Chen, Linling; Doyle, James; Esau, Igor; Hezel, Paul J.; Jung, Thomas; Kohyama, Tsubasa; Lüpkes, Christof; McCusker, Kelly E.; Nygård, Tiiiina; Sergeev, Denis; Shupe, Matttthew D.; Sodemann, Harald; Vihma, Timo.

In: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 97, No. 9, 09.2016, p. ES179-ES182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - High-latitude dynamics of atmosphere-ice-ocean interactions

AU - Spengler, Thomas

AU - Renfrew, Ian A.

AU - Terpstra, Annick

AU - Tjernström, Michael

AU - Screen, James

AU - Brooks, Ian M.

AU - Carleton, Andrew

AU - Chechin, Dmititry

AU - Chen, Linling

AU - Doyle, James

AU - Esau, Igor

AU - Hezel, Paul J.

AU - Jung, Thomas

AU - Kohyama, Tsubasa

AU - Lüpkes, Christof

AU - McCusker, Kelly E.

AU - Nygård, Tiiiina

AU - Sergeev, Denis

AU - Shupe, Matttthew D.

AU - Sodemann, Harald

AU - Vihma, Timo

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - There was recognition that including coupling between atmosphere, sea ice, and ocean can improve forecast skill across a range of time scales. Coupling must therefore be considered across a range of scales appropriate to the time scale of the forecast, from planetary-scale dynamics to subgrid-scale processes in models. It was pointed out that better knowledge is needed as to the dominant causal direction of atmosphere-ocean-ice coupling and polar-midlatitude-tropical interactions and of their physical mechanisms, including the role of the stratosphere. In addition, the effects of model biases on projections for many of the phenomena discussed are still poorly understood. Participants pointed out that further work is required to elucidate the anthropogenic contribution to sea ice trends and to better understand the character of anthropogenic changes in the large-scale atmospheric circulation. Another key message emanating from the discussion was that Arctic-midlatitude interactions are clearly two way, which complicates attribution of cause and effect. For example, Arctic amplification is itself partially a response to lower-latitude forcing. Participants suggested that future research with respect to extreme events at high latitudes should be extended to oceanography, biology, avalanches, and visibility. Furthermore, there was a general agreement to enhance stakeholder involvement with respect to polar predictability. Last, workshop participants pinpointed the importance of process-based studies to make progress on research questions where insufficient observations and/or inadequate models hamper assessment of larger temporal- and spatial-scale processes.

AB - There was recognition that including coupling between atmosphere, sea ice, and ocean can improve forecast skill across a range of time scales. Coupling must therefore be considered across a range of scales appropriate to the time scale of the forecast, from planetary-scale dynamics to subgrid-scale processes in models. It was pointed out that better knowledge is needed as to the dominant causal direction of atmosphere-ocean-ice coupling and polar-midlatitude-tropical interactions and of their physical mechanisms, including the role of the stratosphere. In addition, the effects of model biases on projections for many of the phenomena discussed are still poorly understood. Participants pointed out that further work is required to elucidate the anthropogenic contribution to sea ice trends and to better understand the character of anthropogenic changes in the large-scale atmospheric circulation. Another key message emanating from the discussion was that Arctic-midlatitude interactions are clearly two way, which complicates attribution of cause and effect. For example, Arctic amplification is itself partially a response to lower-latitude forcing. Participants suggested that future research with respect to extreme events at high latitudes should be extended to oceanography, biology, avalanches, and visibility. Furthermore, there was a general agreement to enhance stakeholder involvement with respect to polar predictability. Last, workshop participants pinpointed the importance of process-based studies to make progress on research questions where insufficient observations and/or inadequate models hamper assessment of larger temporal- and spatial-scale processes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992388338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992388338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00302.1

DO - 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00302.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84992388338

VL - 97

SP - ES179-ES182

JO - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

JF - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

SN - 0003-0007

IS - 9

ER -

Spengler T, Renfrew IA, Terpstra A, Tjernström M, Screen J, Brooks IM et al. High-latitude dynamics of atmosphere-ice-ocean interactions. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2016 Sep;97(9):ES179-ES182. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00302.1