Historical and future learning about climate sensitivity

Nathan M. Urban, Philip B. Holden, Neil R. Edwards, Ryan L. Sriver, Klaus Keller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Equilibrium climate sensitivity measures the long-term response of surface temperature to changes in atmospheric CO2 the range of climate sensitivities in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report is unchanged from that published almost 30-years earlier in the Charney Report. We conduct perfect model experiments using an energy balance model to study the rate at which uncertainties might be reduced by observation of global temperature and ocean heat uptake. We find that a climate sensitivity of 1.5°C can be statistically distinguished from 3°C by 2030, 3°C from 4.5°C by 2040, and 4.5°C from 6°C by 2065. Learning rates are slowest in the scenarios of greatest concern (high sensitivities), due to a longer ocean response time, which may have bearing on wait-and-see versus precautionary mitigation policies. Learning rates are optimistic in presuming the availability of whole ocean heat data but pessimistic by using simple aggregated metrics and model physics. Key Points Climate sensitivity uncertainty not greatly reduced over decades of research Continued observations may substantially reduce uncertainty over the next decades Rate of learning may affect wait-and-see versus precautionary mitigation policies

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2543-2552
Number of pages10
JournalGeophysical Research Letters
Volume41
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 16 2014

Fingerprint

learning
climate
sensitivity
oceans
ocean
mitigation
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
heat
energy balance
climate change
surface temperature
physics
availability
rate
experiment
temperature
policy
energy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geophysics
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Urban, Nathan M. ; Holden, Philip B. ; Edwards, Neil R. ; Sriver, Ryan L. ; Keller, Klaus. / Historical and future learning about climate sensitivity. In: Geophysical Research Letters. 2014 ; Vol. 41, No. 7. pp. 2543-2552.
@article{611f5f6307fe4be4a96bb842f5a35bca,
title = "Historical and future learning about climate sensitivity",
abstract = "Equilibrium climate sensitivity measures the long-term response of surface temperature to changes in atmospheric CO2 the range of climate sensitivities in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report is unchanged from that published almost 30-years earlier in the Charney Report. We conduct perfect model experiments using an energy balance model to study the rate at which uncertainties might be reduced by observation of global temperature and ocean heat uptake. We find that a climate sensitivity of 1.5°C can be statistically distinguished from 3°C by 2030, 3°C from 4.5°C by 2040, and 4.5°C from 6°C by 2065. Learning rates are slowest in the scenarios of greatest concern (high sensitivities), due to a longer ocean response time, which may have bearing on wait-and-see versus precautionary mitigation policies. Learning rates are optimistic in presuming the availability of whole ocean heat data but pessimistic by using simple aggregated metrics and model physics. Key Points Climate sensitivity uncertainty not greatly reduced over decades of research Continued observations may substantially reduce uncertainty over the next decades Rate of learning may affect wait-and-see versus precautionary mitigation policies",
author = "Urban, {Nathan M.} and Holden, {Philip B.} and Edwards, {Neil R.} and Sriver, {Ryan L.} and Klaus Keller",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1002/2014GL059484",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "2543--2552",
journal = "Geophysical Research Letters",
issn = "0094-8276",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "7",

}

Urban, NM, Holden, PB, Edwards, NR, Sriver, RL & Keller, K 2014, 'Historical and future learning about climate sensitivity', Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 2543-2552. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059484

Historical and future learning about climate sensitivity. / Urban, Nathan M.; Holden, Philip B.; Edwards, Neil R.; Sriver, Ryan L.; Keller, Klaus.

In: Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 41, No. 7, 16.04.2014, p. 2543-2552.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Historical and future learning about climate sensitivity

AU - Urban, Nathan M.

AU - Holden, Philip B.

AU - Edwards, Neil R.

AU - Sriver, Ryan L.

AU - Keller, Klaus

PY - 2014/4/16

Y1 - 2014/4/16

N2 - Equilibrium climate sensitivity measures the long-term response of surface temperature to changes in atmospheric CO2 the range of climate sensitivities in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report is unchanged from that published almost 30-years earlier in the Charney Report. We conduct perfect model experiments using an energy balance model to study the rate at which uncertainties might be reduced by observation of global temperature and ocean heat uptake. We find that a climate sensitivity of 1.5°C can be statistically distinguished from 3°C by 2030, 3°C from 4.5°C by 2040, and 4.5°C from 6°C by 2065. Learning rates are slowest in the scenarios of greatest concern (high sensitivities), due to a longer ocean response time, which may have bearing on wait-and-see versus precautionary mitigation policies. Learning rates are optimistic in presuming the availability of whole ocean heat data but pessimistic by using simple aggregated metrics and model physics. Key Points Climate sensitivity uncertainty not greatly reduced over decades of research Continued observations may substantially reduce uncertainty over the next decades Rate of learning may affect wait-and-see versus precautionary mitigation policies

AB - Equilibrium climate sensitivity measures the long-term response of surface temperature to changes in atmospheric CO2 the range of climate sensitivities in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report is unchanged from that published almost 30-years earlier in the Charney Report. We conduct perfect model experiments using an energy balance model to study the rate at which uncertainties might be reduced by observation of global temperature and ocean heat uptake. We find that a climate sensitivity of 1.5°C can be statistically distinguished from 3°C by 2030, 3°C from 4.5°C by 2040, and 4.5°C from 6°C by 2065. Learning rates are slowest in the scenarios of greatest concern (high sensitivities), due to a longer ocean response time, which may have bearing on wait-and-see versus precautionary mitigation policies. Learning rates are optimistic in presuming the availability of whole ocean heat data but pessimistic by using simple aggregated metrics and model physics. Key Points Climate sensitivity uncertainty not greatly reduced over decades of research Continued observations may substantially reduce uncertainty over the next decades Rate of learning may affect wait-and-see versus precautionary mitigation policies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899036813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899036813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2014GL059484

DO - 10.1002/2014GL059484

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 2543

EP - 2552

JO - Geophysical Research Letters

JF - Geophysical Research Letters

SN - 0094-8276

IS - 7

ER -