History in fiction

James Acheson, Robert Lawrence Caserio, Jr.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The protagonist of Anthony Burgess's A Malayan Trilogy (1957-9) nastily formulates a relation between history and books. “'History,' said Crabbe…'The best thing to do is to put all that in books and forget about it. A book is a kind of lavatory. We've got to throw up the past, otherwise we can't live in the present. The past has got to be killed.'” As soon as Crabbe makes his declaration, however, the narrator adds that “he reverted to his own past, and pronounced the very word in the Northern style… of his childhood” - a style that makes past sound like pest. Pestilent or not, emetically or not, history has been put into the twentieth-century English novel with a vengeance. It has occurred in a persistent idiosyncratic form: historical fiction by a single author about characters whose stories proliferate in multiple volumes. Burgess's trilogy is a mere mini-example of what might be called historical “series novels.” Tetralogies and five- or six-unit sequences abound; some stretch to a dozen and more. Does so much reference to the past make living in the present easier? Some novelists write about the present as a product of the past or as itself epochal. Does seeing the present as historical also have vivifying effects? Or is it just a matter of profits for writers and publishers whose readers can be captivated by characters with whom, repeatedly, they “live”? Whatever the immediate material determination of the series form, historical crises suggest a motive. A culture undergoing actual transformation from an empire into an island might want to absorb the shock by reading about it, perhaps endlessly. The American title of Burgess's trilogy is The Long Day Wanes, a reference to the setting sun of Empire. As if in compensation, as the day wanes, the fiction waxes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Companion to the Twentieth-Century English Novel
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages176-191
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781139002516
ISBN (Print)9780521884167
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Fiction
History
Trilogy
Declaration
Writer
English Novel
Wax
Lavatory
Childhood
Sound
Vengeance
Historical Fiction
Narrator
Pest
Novel
Protagonist
Reader
Novelist
Profit
Sun

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Acheson, J., & Caserio, Jr., R. L. (2009). History in fiction. In The Cambridge Companion to the Twentieth-Century English Novel (pp. 176-191). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521884167.013
Acheson, James ; Caserio, Jr., Robert Lawrence. / History in fiction. The Cambridge Companion to the Twentieth-Century English Novel. Cambridge University Press, 2009. pp. 176-191
@inbook{92d05ec8b9b948fd850d2630f78035a4,
title = "History in fiction",
abstract = "The protagonist of Anthony Burgess's A Malayan Trilogy (1957-9) nastily formulates a relation between history and books. “'History,' said Crabbe…'The best thing to do is to put all that in books and forget about it. A book is a kind of lavatory. We've got to throw up the past, otherwise we can't live in the present. The past has got to be killed.'” As soon as Crabbe makes his declaration, however, the narrator adds that “he reverted to his own past, and pronounced the very word in the Northern style… of his childhood” - a style that makes past sound like pest. Pestilent or not, emetically or not, history has been put into the twentieth-century English novel with a vengeance. It has occurred in a persistent idiosyncratic form: historical fiction by a single author about characters whose stories proliferate in multiple volumes. Burgess's trilogy is a mere mini-example of what might be called historical “series novels.” Tetralogies and five- or six-unit sequences abound; some stretch to a dozen and more. Does so much reference to the past make living in the present easier? Some novelists write about the present as a product of the past or as itself epochal. Does seeing the present as historical also have vivifying effects? Or is it just a matter of profits for writers and publishers whose readers can be captivated by characters with whom, repeatedly, they “live”? Whatever the immediate material determination of the series form, historical crises suggest a motive. A culture undergoing actual transformation from an empire into an island might want to absorb the shock by reading about it, perhaps endlessly. The American title of Burgess's trilogy is The Long Day Wanes, a reference to the setting sun of Empire. As if in compensation, as the day wanes, the fiction waxes.",
author = "James Acheson and {Caserio, Jr.}, {Robert Lawrence}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CCOL9780521884167.013",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521884167",
pages = "176--191",
booktitle = "The Cambridge Companion to the Twentieth-Century English Novel",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Acheson, J & Caserio, Jr., RL 2009, History in fiction. in The Cambridge Companion to the Twentieth-Century English Novel. Cambridge University Press, pp. 176-191. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521884167.013

History in fiction. / Acheson, James; Caserio, Jr., Robert Lawrence.

The Cambridge Companion to the Twentieth-Century English Novel. Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 176-191.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - History in fiction

AU - Acheson, James

AU - Caserio, Jr., Robert Lawrence

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - The protagonist of Anthony Burgess's A Malayan Trilogy (1957-9) nastily formulates a relation between history and books. “'History,' said Crabbe…'The best thing to do is to put all that in books and forget about it. A book is a kind of lavatory. We've got to throw up the past, otherwise we can't live in the present. The past has got to be killed.'” As soon as Crabbe makes his declaration, however, the narrator adds that “he reverted to his own past, and pronounced the very word in the Northern style… of his childhood” - a style that makes past sound like pest. Pestilent or not, emetically or not, history has been put into the twentieth-century English novel with a vengeance. It has occurred in a persistent idiosyncratic form: historical fiction by a single author about characters whose stories proliferate in multiple volumes. Burgess's trilogy is a mere mini-example of what might be called historical “series novels.” Tetralogies and five- or six-unit sequences abound; some stretch to a dozen and more. Does so much reference to the past make living in the present easier? Some novelists write about the present as a product of the past or as itself epochal. Does seeing the present as historical also have vivifying effects? Or is it just a matter of profits for writers and publishers whose readers can be captivated by characters with whom, repeatedly, they “live”? Whatever the immediate material determination of the series form, historical crises suggest a motive. A culture undergoing actual transformation from an empire into an island might want to absorb the shock by reading about it, perhaps endlessly. The American title of Burgess's trilogy is The Long Day Wanes, a reference to the setting sun of Empire. As if in compensation, as the day wanes, the fiction waxes.

AB - The protagonist of Anthony Burgess's A Malayan Trilogy (1957-9) nastily formulates a relation between history and books. “'History,' said Crabbe…'The best thing to do is to put all that in books and forget about it. A book is a kind of lavatory. We've got to throw up the past, otherwise we can't live in the present. The past has got to be killed.'” As soon as Crabbe makes his declaration, however, the narrator adds that “he reverted to his own past, and pronounced the very word in the Northern style… of his childhood” - a style that makes past sound like pest. Pestilent or not, emetically or not, history has been put into the twentieth-century English novel with a vengeance. It has occurred in a persistent idiosyncratic form: historical fiction by a single author about characters whose stories proliferate in multiple volumes. Burgess's trilogy is a mere mini-example of what might be called historical “series novels.” Tetralogies and five- or six-unit sequences abound; some stretch to a dozen and more. Does so much reference to the past make living in the present easier? Some novelists write about the present as a product of the past or as itself epochal. Does seeing the present as historical also have vivifying effects? Or is it just a matter of profits for writers and publishers whose readers can be captivated by characters with whom, repeatedly, they “live”? Whatever the immediate material determination of the series form, historical crises suggest a motive. A culture undergoing actual transformation from an empire into an island might want to absorb the shock by reading about it, perhaps endlessly. The American title of Burgess's trilogy is The Long Day Wanes, a reference to the setting sun of Empire. As if in compensation, as the day wanes, the fiction waxes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926992342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926992342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CCOL9780521884167.013

DO - 10.1017/CCOL9780521884167.013

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84926992342

SN - 9780521884167

SP - 176

EP - 191

BT - The Cambridge Companion to the Twentieth-Century English Novel

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Acheson J, Caserio, Jr. RL. History in fiction. In The Cambridge Companion to the Twentieth-Century English Novel. Cambridge University Press. 2009. p. 176-191 https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521884167.013