TY - JOUR
T1 - Home Health Rehabilitation Utilization Among Medicare Beneficiaries Following Critical Illness
AU - Falvey, Jason R.
AU - Murphy, Terrence E.
AU - Gill, Thomas M.
AU - Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E.
AU - Ferrante, Lauren E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Jason R. Falvey received grant support from a Health Services Research Pipeline Grant from the Foundation for Physical Therapy Research and a National Institute on Aging (NIA) training grant (T32AG019134). Jason R. Falvey and Jennifer E. Stevens-Lapsley received grant support from the Center on Health Services Training and Research and the American Physical Therapy Association Home Health Section. Jennifer E. Stevens-Lapsley is supported by the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center. Terrence E. Murphy is supported by the Yale Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center of the NIA [P30AG021342]. Thomas M. Gillis is the recipient of an Academic Leadership Award [K07AG043587] from the NIA. Lauren E. Ferrante is supported by a Paul B. Beeson Emerging Leaders Career Development Award in Aging from the NIA (K76AG057023). Support for VA/CMS data was provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Health Services Research and Development Services, VA Information Resource Center (project nos. SDR-02-237 and 98-004). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government. The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article. Study design: Falvey, Gill, Murphy, and Ferrante. Methods: Falvey, Murphy, and Ferrante. Subjects recruitment/Data acquisition: Falvey and Stevens-Lapsley. Data collection: Falvey and Stevens-Lapsley. Analysis/Interpretation: All authors. Preparation of article: All authors. The funding agencies had no role in the design, methods, recruitment, data collection, analysis, or preparation of the manuscript.
Funding Information:
Support for VA/CMS data was provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Health Services Research and Development Services, VA Information Resource Center (project nos. SDR‐02‐237 and 98‐004). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government.
Funding Information:
Jason R. Falvey received grant support from a Health Services Research Pipeline Grant from the Foundation for Physical Therapy Research and a National Institute on Aging (NIA) training grant (T32AG019134). Jason R. Falvey and Jennifer E. Stevens‐Lapsley received grant support from the Center on Health Services Training and Research and the American Physical Therapy Association Home Health Section. Jennifer E. Stevens‐Lapsley is supported by the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center. Terrence E. Murphy is supported by the Yale Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center of the NIA [P30AG021342]. Thomas M. Gillis is the recipient of an Academic Leadership Award [K07AG043587] from the NIA. Lauren E. Ferrante is supported by a Paul B. Beeson Emerging Leaders Career Development Award in Aging from the NIA (K76AG057023).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The American Geriatrics Society
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Medicare beneficiaries recovering from a critical illness are increasingly being discharged home instead of to post-acute care facilities. Rehabilitation services are commonly recommended for intensive care unit (ICU) survivors; however, little is known about the frequency and dose of home-based rehabilitation in this population. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 2012 Medicare hospital and home health (HH) claims data, linked with assessment data from the Medicare Outcomes and Assessment Information Set. SETTING: Participant homes. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries recovering from an ICU stay longer than 24 hours, who were discharged directly home with HH services within 7 days of discharge and survived without readmission or hospice transfer for at least 30 days (n = 3,176). MEASUREMENTS: Count of rehabilitation visits received during HH care episode. RESULTS: A total of 19,564 rehabilitation visits were delivered to ICU survivors over 118,145 person-days in HH settings, a rate of 1.16 visits per week. One-third of ICU survivors received no rehabilitation visits during HH care. In adjusted models, those with the highest baseline disability received 30% more visits (rate ratio [RR] = 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17-1.45) than those with the least disability. Conversely, an inverse relationship was found between multimorbidity (Elixhauser scores) and count of rehabilitation visits received; those with the highest tertile of Elixhauser scores received 11% fewer visits (RR =.89; 95% CI =.81-.99) than those in the lowest tertile. Participants living in a rural setting (vs urban) received 6% fewer visits (RR =.94; 95% CI =.91-.98); those who lived alone received 11% fewer visits (RR =.89; 95% CI =.82-.96) than those who lived with others. CONCLUSION: On average, Medicare beneficiaries discharged home after a critical illness receive few rehabilitation visits in the early post-hospitalization period. Those who had more comorbidities, who lived alone, or who lived in rural settings received even fewer visits, suggesting a need for their consideration during discharge planning. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1512-1519, 2020.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Medicare beneficiaries recovering from a critical illness are increasingly being discharged home instead of to post-acute care facilities. Rehabilitation services are commonly recommended for intensive care unit (ICU) survivors; however, little is known about the frequency and dose of home-based rehabilitation in this population. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 2012 Medicare hospital and home health (HH) claims data, linked with assessment data from the Medicare Outcomes and Assessment Information Set. SETTING: Participant homes. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries recovering from an ICU stay longer than 24 hours, who were discharged directly home with HH services within 7 days of discharge and survived without readmission or hospice transfer for at least 30 days (n = 3,176). MEASUREMENTS: Count of rehabilitation visits received during HH care episode. RESULTS: A total of 19,564 rehabilitation visits were delivered to ICU survivors over 118,145 person-days in HH settings, a rate of 1.16 visits per week. One-third of ICU survivors received no rehabilitation visits during HH care. In adjusted models, those with the highest baseline disability received 30% more visits (rate ratio [RR] = 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17-1.45) than those with the least disability. Conversely, an inverse relationship was found between multimorbidity (Elixhauser scores) and count of rehabilitation visits received; those with the highest tertile of Elixhauser scores received 11% fewer visits (RR =.89; 95% CI =.81-.99) than those in the lowest tertile. Participants living in a rural setting (vs urban) received 6% fewer visits (RR =.94; 95% CI =.91-.98); those who lived alone received 11% fewer visits (RR =.89; 95% CI =.82-.96) than those who lived with others. CONCLUSION: On average, Medicare beneficiaries discharged home after a critical illness receive few rehabilitation visits in the early post-hospitalization period. Those who had more comorbidities, who lived alone, or who lived in rural settings received even fewer visits, suggesting a need for their consideration during discharge planning. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1512-1519, 2020.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082433841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082433841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jgs.16412
DO - 10.1111/jgs.16412
M3 - Article
C2 - 32187664
AN - SCOPUS:85082433841
SN - 0002-8614
VL - 68
SP - 1512
EP - 1519
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IS - 7
ER -