Hospital patient safety grades may misrepresent hospital performance

Wenke Hwang, Jordan Derk, Michelle Laclair, Harold Paz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nationally, there is strong interest in measuring hospital performance in patient safety. The Leapfrog Group uses a survey, along with other data sources, to calculate patient safety scores for 2600 hospitals across the United States. Under this methodology, every hospital is assigned 1 of 5 letter grades (A, B, C, D, F) depending on how the hospital stands in safety performance relative to all other hospitals. The results have been widely marketed and disseminated to employers, payors, and the public. Leapfrog strongly encourages employers and payors to negotiate hospital reimbursement rates based on the safety grade the hospital receives. Leapfrog's effort to develop a standardized method to provide patient safety information should be commended. However, less than one-half of the 2600 hospitals participated in the Leapfrog survey. For those nonparticipating hospitals, certain safety measures were absent and alternative measures were used to calculate the safety score. A sample of the nation's most prestigious hospitals (n=35) was drawn from the U.S. News & World Report's "Best Hospitals." Overall, the group of participating hospitals (n=18) received an average grade of A (mean safety score=3.165), whereas the group of nonparticipating hospitals received an average grade of B (mean safety score=3.012). These nonparticipating hospitals were rescored using the methodology for participating hospitals. The results show that the majority of nonparticipating hospitals would have received a better safety grade. This demonstrates a potential shortcoming of Leapfrog's method and its tendency to discriminate against nonparticipating hospitals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-115
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Hospital Medicine
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Safety
Information Storage and Retrieval

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Leadership and Management
  • Internal Medicine
  • Fundamentals and skills
  • Health Policy
  • Care Planning
  • Assessment and Diagnosis

Cite this

@article{97a469e847e44324abec5cb2f771b559,
title = "Hospital patient safety grades may misrepresent hospital performance",
abstract = "Nationally, there is strong interest in measuring hospital performance in patient safety. The Leapfrog Group uses a survey, along with other data sources, to calculate patient safety scores for 2600 hospitals across the United States. Under this methodology, every hospital is assigned 1 of 5 letter grades (A, B, C, D, F) depending on how the hospital stands in safety performance relative to all other hospitals. The results have been widely marketed and disseminated to employers, payors, and the public. Leapfrog strongly encourages employers and payors to negotiate hospital reimbursement rates based on the safety grade the hospital receives. Leapfrog's effort to develop a standardized method to provide patient safety information should be commended. However, less than one-half of the 2600 hospitals participated in the Leapfrog survey. For those nonparticipating hospitals, certain safety measures were absent and alternative measures were used to calculate the safety score. A sample of the nation's most prestigious hospitals (n=35) was drawn from the U.S. News & World Report's {"}Best Hospitals.{"} Overall, the group of participating hospitals (n=18) received an average grade of A (mean safety score=3.165), whereas the group of nonparticipating hospitals received an average grade of B (mean safety score=3.012). These nonparticipating hospitals were rescored using the methodology for participating hospitals. The results show that the majority of nonparticipating hospitals would have received a better safety grade. This demonstrates a potential shortcoming of Leapfrog's method and its tendency to discriminate against nonparticipating hospitals.",
author = "Wenke Hwang and Jordan Derk and Michelle Laclair and Harold Paz",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jhm.2139",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "111--115",
journal = "Journal of Hospital Medicine",
issn = "1553-5606",
publisher = "Society of Hospital Medicine",
number = "2",

}

Hospital patient safety grades may misrepresent hospital performance. / Hwang, Wenke; Derk, Jordan; Laclair, Michelle; Paz, Harold.

In: Journal of Hospital Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.02.2014, p. 111-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hospital patient safety grades may misrepresent hospital performance

AU - Hwang, Wenke

AU - Derk, Jordan

AU - Laclair, Michelle

AU - Paz, Harold

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - Nationally, there is strong interest in measuring hospital performance in patient safety. The Leapfrog Group uses a survey, along with other data sources, to calculate patient safety scores for 2600 hospitals across the United States. Under this methodology, every hospital is assigned 1 of 5 letter grades (A, B, C, D, F) depending on how the hospital stands in safety performance relative to all other hospitals. The results have been widely marketed and disseminated to employers, payors, and the public. Leapfrog strongly encourages employers and payors to negotiate hospital reimbursement rates based on the safety grade the hospital receives. Leapfrog's effort to develop a standardized method to provide patient safety information should be commended. However, less than one-half of the 2600 hospitals participated in the Leapfrog survey. For those nonparticipating hospitals, certain safety measures were absent and alternative measures were used to calculate the safety score. A sample of the nation's most prestigious hospitals (n=35) was drawn from the U.S. News & World Report's "Best Hospitals." Overall, the group of participating hospitals (n=18) received an average grade of A (mean safety score=3.165), whereas the group of nonparticipating hospitals received an average grade of B (mean safety score=3.012). These nonparticipating hospitals were rescored using the methodology for participating hospitals. The results show that the majority of nonparticipating hospitals would have received a better safety grade. This demonstrates a potential shortcoming of Leapfrog's method and its tendency to discriminate against nonparticipating hospitals.

AB - Nationally, there is strong interest in measuring hospital performance in patient safety. The Leapfrog Group uses a survey, along with other data sources, to calculate patient safety scores for 2600 hospitals across the United States. Under this methodology, every hospital is assigned 1 of 5 letter grades (A, B, C, D, F) depending on how the hospital stands in safety performance relative to all other hospitals. The results have been widely marketed and disseminated to employers, payors, and the public. Leapfrog strongly encourages employers and payors to negotiate hospital reimbursement rates based on the safety grade the hospital receives. Leapfrog's effort to develop a standardized method to provide patient safety information should be commended. However, less than one-half of the 2600 hospitals participated in the Leapfrog survey. For those nonparticipating hospitals, certain safety measures were absent and alternative measures were used to calculate the safety score. A sample of the nation's most prestigious hospitals (n=35) was drawn from the U.S. News & World Report's "Best Hospitals." Overall, the group of participating hospitals (n=18) received an average grade of A (mean safety score=3.165), whereas the group of nonparticipating hospitals received an average grade of B (mean safety score=3.012). These nonparticipating hospitals were rescored using the methodology for participating hospitals. The results show that the majority of nonparticipating hospitals would have received a better safety grade. This demonstrates a potential shortcoming of Leapfrog's method and its tendency to discriminate against nonparticipating hospitals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893737955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893737955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jhm.2139

DO - 10.1002/jhm.2139

M3 - Article

C2 - 24420641

AN - SCOPUS:84893737955

VL - 9

SP - 111

EP - 115

JO - Journal of Hospital Medicine

JF - Journal of Hospital Medicine

SN - 1553-5606

IS - 2

ER -