House call practices: A comparison by specialty

A. M. Adelman, L. Fredman, A. L. Knight

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. There has been no national survey of physician house calls since 1980, and in particular, no survey of pediatric house calls in 30 years. This national study was undertaken to compare physician house call practices among family physicians, general internists, and general pediatricians. Methods. A mail survey was conducted of 1500 primary care physicians who were randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Master File. Five hundred physicians were selected from each of three specialties: family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics. Results. Nine hundred six questionnaires were returned for a response rate of 59%. The percentage of family physicians making house calls was significantly greater than that of internists or pediatricians (63%, 47%, and 15%, respectively). Factors associated with making house calls were: house calls being a common practice in the community, solo practice, specialty (family practice), sex (male), and practice location in the northeast. Physicians who agreed with the following attitudes were more likely to make house calls: (1) making house calls leads to high patient satisfaction; (2) house calls are important for good comprehensive patient care; and (3) house calls are satisfying for physicians. Physicians who agreed that making house calls exposes them to a significant malpractice risk were half as likely to make house calls. Conclusions. Family physicians made significantly more house calls than internists or pediatricians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-44
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Family Practice
Volume39
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

House Calls
Physicians
Family Physicians
Pediatrics
Family Practice
Private Practice
Malpractice
Postal Service
American Medical Association
Primary Care Physicians
Internal Medicine
Patient Satisfaction
Patient Care

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Adelman, A. M. ; Fredman, L. ; Knight, A. L. / House call practices : A comparison by specialty. In: Journal of Family Practice. 1994 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 39-44.
@article{bd9a74f3cd0343beae13b48f9485039b,
title = "House call practices: A comparison by specialty",
abstract = "Background. There has been no national survey of physician house calls since 1980, and in particular, no survey of pediatric house calls in 30 years. This national study was undertaken to compare physician house call practices among family physicians, general internists, and general pediatricians. Methods. A mail survey was conducted of 1500 primary care physicians who were randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Master File. Five hundred physicians were selected from each of three specialties: family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics. Results. Nine hundred six questionnaires were returned for a response rate of 59{\%}. The percentage of family physicians making house calls was significantly greater than that of internists or pediatricians (63{\%}, 47{\%}, and 15{\%}, respectively). Factors associated with making house calls were: house calls being a common practice in the community, solo practice, specialty (family practice), sex (male), and practice location in the northeast. Physicians who agreed with the following attitudes were more likely to make house calls: (1) making house calls leads to high patient satisfaction; (2) house calls are important for good comprehensive patient care; and (3) house calls are satisfying for physicians. Physicians who agreed that making house calls exposes them to a significant malpractice risk were half as likely to make house calls. Conclusions. Family physicians made significantly more house calls than internists or pediatricians.",
author = "Adelman, {A. M.} and L. Fredman and Knight, {A. L.}",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "39--44",
journal = "Journal of Family Practice",
issn = "0094-3509",
publisher = "Appleton-Century-Crofts",
number = "1",

}

Adelman, AM, Fredman, L & Knight, AL 1994, 'House call practices: A comparison by specialty', Journal of Family Practice, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 39-44.

House call practices : A comparison by specialty. / Adelman, A. M.; Fredman, L.; Knight, A. L.

In: Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.01.1994, p. 39-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - House call practices

T2 - A comparison by specialty

AU - Adelman, A. M.

AU - Fredman, L.

AU - Knight, A. L.

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - Background. There has been no national survey of physician house calls since 1980, and in particular, no survey of pediatric house calls in 30 years. This national study was undertaken to compare physician house call practices among family physicians, general internists, and general pediatricians. Methods. A mail survey was conducted of 1500 primary care physicians who were randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Master File. Five hundred physicians were selected from each of three specialties: family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics. Results. Nine hundred six questionnaires were returned for a response rate of 59%. The percentage of family physicians making house calls was significantly greater than that of internists or pediatricians (63%, 47%, and 15%, respectively). Factors associated with making house calls were: house calls being a common practice in the community, solo practice, specialty (family practice), sex (male), and practice location in the northeast. Physicians who agreed with the following attitudes were more likely to make house calls: (1) making house calls leads to high patient satisfaction; (2) house calls are important for good comprehensive patient care; and (3) house calls are satisfying for physicians. Physicians who agreed that making house calls exposes them to a significant malpractice risk were half as likely to make house calls. Conclusions. Family physicians made significantly more house calls than internists or pediatricians.

AB - Background. There has been no national survey of physician house calls since 1980, and in particular, no survey of pediatric house calls in 30 years. This national study was undertaken to compare physician house call practices among family physicians, general internists, and general pediatricians. Methods. A mail survey was conducted of 1500 primary care physicians who were randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Master File. Five hundred physicians were selected from each of three specialties: family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics. Results. Nine hundred six questionnaires were returned for a response rate of 59%. The percentage of family physicians making house calls was significantly greater than that of internists or pediatricians (63%, 47%, and 15%, respectively). Factors associated with making house calls were: house calls being a common practice in the community, solo practice, specialty (family practice), sex (male), and practice location in the northeast. Physicians who agreed with the following attitudes were more likely to make house calls: (1) making house calls leads to high patient satisfaction; (2) house calls are important for good comprehensive patient care; and (3) house calls are satisfying for physicians. Physicians who agreed that making house calls exposes them to a significant malpractice risk were half as likely to make house calls. Conclusions. Family physicians made significantly more house calls than internists or pediatricians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028343219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028343219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8027731

AN - SCOPUS:0028343219

VL - 39

SP - 39

EP - 44

JO - Journal of Family Practice

JF - Journal of Family Practice

SN - 0094-3509

IS - 1

ER -