How agricultural science trumps rural community in the discourse of selected U.S. history textbooks

Marged Howley, Aimee Howley, Karen Eppley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Using narrative from 6 high school American history textbooks published between 1956 and 2009, this study investigated changes in how textbook authors presented the topics of agricultural science, farming, and community. Although some critical discourse analyses have examined textbooks treatment of different population groups (e.g., African Americans, women) or particular historical trends (e.g., industrialization), few have explored textbooks treatment of rural cultures and occupations. The critical analysis undertaken in this study revealed that there was a decline over time in the salience of the theme, the promise of science and technology for improving agriculture. It also suggested that a decline in explicit rhetoric in support of industrial agriculture accompanied widespread acceptance of this approach, with its emphasis on monoculture and corporate management, trumping an earlier idyll of the small farm, with its emphasis on nurture, family, and community. Interpretation of these findings rests on the distinction between the Jeffersonian and the Hamiltonian ideals for the American nation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-218
Number of pages32
JournalTheory and Research in Social Education
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2013

Fingerprint

rural community
textbook
discourse
history
science
agriculture
population group
industrialization
community
rhetoric
farm
occupation
acceptance
narrative
interpretation
trend
management
school

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{185faf3579fe4aeaabd073dc8235069c,
title = "How agricultural science trumps rural community in the discourse of selected U.S. history textbooks",
abstract = "Using narrative from 6 high school American history textbooks published between 1956 and 2009, this study investigated changes in how textbook authors presented the topics of agricultural science, farming, and community. Although some critical discourse analyses have examined textbooks treatment of different population groups (e.g., African Americans, women) or particular historical trends (e.g., industrialization), few have explored textbooks treatment of rural cultures and occupations. The critical analysis undertaken in this study revealed that there was a decline over time in the salience of the theme, the promise of science and technology for improving agriculture. It also suggested that a decline in explicit rhetoric in support of industrial agriculture accompanied widespread acceptance of this approach, with its emphasis on monoculture and corporate management, trumping an earlier idyll of the small farm, with its emphasis on nurture, family, and community. Interpretation of these findings rests on the distinction between the Jeffersonian and the Hamiltonian ideals for the American nation.",
author = "Marged Howley and Aimee Howley and Karen Eppley",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00933104.2013.778715",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "187--218",
journal = "Theory and Research in Social Education",
issn = "0093-3104",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

How agricultural science trumps rural community in the discourse of selected U.S. history textbooks. / Howley, Marged; Howley, Aimee; Eppley, Karen.

In: Theory and Research in Social Education, Vol. 41, No. 2, 01.04.2013, p. 187-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How agricultural science trumps rural community in the discourse of selected U.S. history textbooks

AU - Howley, Marged

AU - Howley, Aimee

AU - Eppley, Karen

PY - 2013/4/1

Y1 - 2013/4/1

N2 - Using narrative from 6 high school American history textbooks published between 1956 and 2009, this study investigated changes in how textbook authors presented the topics of agricultural science, farming, and community. Although some critical discourse analyses have examined textbooks treatment of different population groups (e.g., African Americans, women) or particular historical trends (e.g., industrialization), few have explored textbooks treatment of rural cultures and occupations. The critical analysis undertaken in this study revealed that there was a decline over time in the salience of the theme, the promise of science and technology for improving agriculture. It also suggested that a decline in explicit rhetoric in support of industrial agriculture accompanied widespread acceptance of this approach, with its emphasis on monoculture and corporate management, trumping an earlier idyll of the small farm, with its emphasis on nurture, family, and community. Interpretation of these findings rests on the distinction between the Jeffersonian and the Hamiltonian ideals for the American nation.

AB - Using narrative from 6 high school American history textbooks published between 1956 and 2009, this study investigated changes in how textbook authors presented the topics of agricultural science, farming, and community. Although some critical discourse analyses have examined textbooks treatment of different population groups (e.g., African Americans, women) or particular historical trends (e.g., industrialization), few have explored textbooks treatment of rural cultures and occupations. The critical analysis undertaken in this study revealed that there was a decline over time in the salience of the theme, the promise of science and technology for improving agriculture. It also suggested that a decline in explicit rhetoric in support of industrial agriculture accompanied widespread acceptance of this approach, with its emphasis on monoculture and corporate management, trumping an earlier idyll of the small farm, with its emphasis on nurture, family, and community. Interpretation of these findings rests on the distinction between the Jeffersonian and the Hamiltonian ideals for the American nation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878614345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878614345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00933104.2013.778715

DO - 10.1080/00933104.2013.778715

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84878614345

VL - 41

SP - 187

EP - 218

JO - Theory and Research in Social Education

JF - Theory and Research in Social Education

SN - 0093-3104

IS - 2

ER -