How Analogue Research Can Advance Descriptive Evaluation Theory: Understanding (and Improving) Stakeholder Dialogue

Bernadette Campbell, Melvin Michael Mark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Evaluation theories can be tested in various ways. One approach, the experimental analogue study, is described and illustrated in this article. The approach is presented as a method worthy to use in the pursuit of what Alkin and others have called descriptive evaluation theory. Drawing on analogue studies conducted by the first author, we illustrate the potential benefits and limitations of analogue experiments for studying aspects of evaluation and for contributing to the development and refinement of evaluation theory. Specifically, we describe the results of two studies that examined stakeholder dialogue under different conditions of accountability frame, interpersonal motives, and epistemic motives. We present the studies’ main findings while highlighting the potential for analogue studies to investigate questions of interest concerning evaluation practice and theory. Potentials and pitfalls of the analogue study approach are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)204-220
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 4 2015

Fingerprint

dialogue
stakeholder
evaluation
Research
Social Responsibility
Evaluation theory
Stakeholder dialogue
responsibility
experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{1a23eaeaa1684200a31994709d57844e,
title = "How Analogue Research Can Advance Descriptive Evaluation Theory: Understanding (and Improving) Stakeholder Dialogue",
abstract = "Evaluation theories can be tested in various ways. One approach, the experimental analogue study, is described and illustrated in this article. The approach is presented as a method worthy to use in the pursuit of what Alkin and others have called descriptive evaluation theory. Drawing on analogue studies conducted by the first author, we illustrate the potential benefits and limitations of analogue experiments for studying aspects of evaluation and for contributing to the development and refinement of evaluation theory. Specifically, we describe the results of two studies that examined stakeholder dialogue under different conditions of accountability frame, interpersonal motives, and epistemic motives. We present the studies’ main findings while highlighting the potential for analogue studies to investigate questions of interest concerning evaluation practice and theory. Potentials and pitfalls of the analogue study approach are discussed.",
author = "Bernadette Campbell and Mark, {Melvin Michael}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1177/1098214014532166",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "204--220",
journal = "American Journal of Evaluation",
issn = "1098-2140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

How Analogue Research Can Advance Descriptive Evaluation Theory : Understanding (and Improving) Stakeholder Dialogue. / Campbell, Bernadette; Mark, Melvin Michael.

In: American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 36, No. 2, 04.06.2015, p. 204-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Analogue Research Can Advance Descriptive Evaluation Theory

T2 - Understanding (and Improving) Stakeholder Dialogue

AU - Campbell, Bernadette

AU - Mark, Melvin Michael

PY - 2015/6/4

Y1 - 2015/6/4

N2 - Evaluation theories can be tested in various ways. One approach, the experimental analogue study, is described and illustrated in this article. The approach is presented as a method worthy to use in the pursuit of what Alkin and others have called descriptive evaluation theory. Drawing on analogue studies conducted by the first author, we illustrate the potential benefits and limitations of analogue experiments for studying aspects of evaluation and for contributing to the development and refinement of evaluation theory. Specifically, we describe the results of two studies that examined stakeholder dialogue under different conditions of accountability frame, interpersonal motives, and epistemic motives. We present the studies’ main findings while highlighting the potential for analogue studies to investigate questions of interest concerning evaluation practice and theory. Potentials and pitfalls of the analogue study approach are discussed.

AB - Evaluation theories can be tested in various ways. One approach, the experimental analogue study, is described and illustrated in this article. The approach is presented as a method worthy to use in the pursuit of what Alkin and others have called descriptive evaluation theory. Drawing on analogue studies conducted by the first author, we illustrate the potential benefits and limitations of analogue experiments for studying aspects of evaluation and for contributing to the development and refinement of evaluation theory. Specifically, we describe the results of two studies that examined stakeholder dialogue under different conditions of accountability frame, interpersonal motives, and epistemic motives. We present the studies’ main findings while highlighting the potential for analogue studies to investigate questions of interest concerning evaluation practice and theory. Potentials and pitfalls of the analogue study approach are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930397297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930397297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1098214014532166

DO - 10.1177/1098214014532166

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930397297

VL - 36

SP - 204

EP - 220

JO - American Journal of Evaluation

JF - American Journal of Evaluation

SN - 1098-2140

IS - 2

ER -