How Daubert and its progeny have failed criminalistics evidence and a few things the judiciary could do about it

David Harris Kaye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1639-1659
Number of pages21
JournalFordham Law Review
Volume86
Issue number4
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

judiciary
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Cite this

@article{ec48825182fe4183ac8e0700a65ce10d,
title = "How Daubert and its progeny have failed criminalistics evidence and a few things the judiciary could do about it",
author = "Kaye, {David Harris}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "1639--1659",
journal = "Fordham Law Review",
issn = "0015-704X",
publisher = "Fordham University School of Law",
number = "4",

}

How Daubert and its progeny have failed criminalistics evidence and a few things the judiciary could do about it. / Kaye, David Harris.

In: Fordham Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 4, 01.03.2018, p. 1639-1659.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Daubert and its progeny have failed criminalistics evidence and a few things the judiciary could do about it

AU - Kaye, David Harris

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044530517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044530517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 1639

EP - 1659

JO - Fordham Law Review

JF - Fordham Law Review

SN - 0015-704X

IS - 4

ER -