How do I choose? The influence of concept selection methods on student team decision-making

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

While research has been conducted to study the use of concept selection methods in design education, few studies have focused on the influence of these methods on individual students' and teams' thought processes in grade-dependent class projects. In order to fill this research gap, the current study was designed to compare the influence of two concept selection methods, the Concept Selection Matrix (CSM) and a new adjective assessment method called the Tool for Assessing Semantic Creativity (TASC), through an experimental study in two sections of a first year engineering design class. The results of the study show that while students were equally confident in the concept ratings from the CSM and TASC methods, they reported that they were more likely to select ideas ranked highly in the CSM method. However, subsequent analysis revealed no difference between the common elements in the ideas rated highly by the two methods and the final design ideas produced.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication18th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 13th International Conference on Design Education; 9th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
ISBN (Electronic)9780791850138
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
EventASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2016 - Charlotte, United States
Duration: Aug 21 2016Aug 24 2016

Publication series

NameProceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
Volume3

Other

OtherASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2016
CountryUnited States
CityCharlotte
Period8/21/168/24/16

Fingerprint

Choose
Decision making
Decision Making
Students
Semantics
Education
Matrix Method
Engineering Design
Concepts
Influence
Experimental Study
Likely
Dependent
Creativity
Class
Design

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

Zheng, X., & Miller, S. R. (2016). How do I choose? The influence of concept selection methods on student team decision-making. In 18th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 13th International Conference on Design Education; 9th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference; Vol. 3). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-60333
Zheng, Xuan ; Miller, Scarlett Rae. / How do I choose? The influence of concept selection methods on student team decision-making. 18th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 13th International Conference on Design Education; 9th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2016. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference).
@inproceedings{0772cc95fd064882ac8f530524053b7a,
title = "How do I choose? The influence of concept selection methods on student team decision-making",
abstract = "While research has been conducted to study the use of concept selection methods in design education, few studies have focused on the influence of these methods on individual students' and teams' thought processes in grade-dependent class projects. In order to fill this research gap, the current study was designed to compare the influence of two concept selection methods, the Concept Selection Matrix (CSM) and a new adjective assessment method called the Tool for Assessing Semantic Creativity (TASC), through an experimental study in two sections of a first year engineering design class. The results of the study show that while students were equally confident in the concept ratings from the CSM and TASC methods, they reported that they were more likely to select ideas ranked highly in the CSM method. However, subsequent analysis revealed no difference between the common elements in the ideas rated highly by the two methods and the final design ideas produced.",
author = "Xuan Zheng and Miller, {Scarlett Rae}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/DETC2016-60333",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)",
booktitle = "18th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 13th International Conference on Design Education; 9th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices",

}

Zheng, X & Miller, SR 2016, How do I choose? The influence of concept selection methods on student team decision-making. in 18th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 13th International Conference on Design Education; 9th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, vol. 3, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2016, Charlotte, United States, 8/21/16. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-60333

How do I choose? The influence of concept selection methods on student team decision-making. / Zheng, Xuan; Miller, Scarlett Rae.

18th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 13th International Conference on Design Education; 9th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2016. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference; Vol. 3).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - How do I choose? The influence of concept selection methods on student team decision-making

AU - Zheng, Xuan

AU - Miller, Scarlett Rae

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - While research has been conducted to study the use of concept selection methods in design education, few studies have focused on the influence of these methods on individual students' and teams' thought processes in grade-dependent class projects. In order to fill this research gap, the current study was designed to compare the influence of two concept selection methods, the Concept Selection Matrix (CSM) and a new adjective assessment method called the Tool for Assessing Semantic Creativity (TASC), through an experimental study in two sections of a first year engineering design class. The results of the study show that while students were equally confident in the concept ratings from the CSM and TASC methods, they reported that they were more likely to select ideas ranked highly in the CSM method. However, subsequent analysis revealed no difference between the common elements in the ideas rated highly by the two methods and the final design ideas produced.

AB - While research has been conducted to study the use of concept selection methods in design education, few studies have focused on the influence of these methods on individual students' and teams' thought processes in grade-dependent class projects. In order to fill this research gap, the current study was designed to compare the influence of two concept selection methods, the Concept Selection Matrix (CSM) and a new adjective assessment method called the Tool for Assessing Semantic Creativity (TASC), through an experimental study in two sections of a first year engineering design class. The results of the study show that while students were equally confident in the concept ratings from the CSM and TASC methods, they reported that they were more likely to select ideas ranked highly in the CSM method. However, subsequent analysis revealed no difference between the common elements in the ideas rated highly by the two methods and the final design ideas produced.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007350186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007350186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/DETC2016-60333

DO - 10.1115/DETC2016-60333

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85007350186

T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

BT - 18th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 13th International Conference on Design Education; 9th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices

PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

ER -

Zheng X, Miller SR. How do I choose? The influence of concept selection methods on student team decision-making. In 18th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 13th International Conference on Design Education; 9th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 2016. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-60333