How do pregnancy intentions affect contraceptive choices when cost is not a factor? A study of privately insured women

Carol S. Weisman, Erik B. Lehman, Richard S. Legro, Diana L. Velott, Cynthia H. Chuang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The objective was to test the hypothesis that among privately insured women who have contraceptive coverage without cost-sharing, using prescription contraception is predicted primarily by pregnancy intentions. Study design Participants are 987 women ages 18-40 who wish to avoid pregnancy for at least the next 12 months and are enrolled in Highmark Health plans in Pennsylvania. Data are from the baseline survey of MyNewOptions, an ongoing randomized controlled trial testing an intervention to help insured women make optimum contraceptive choices. Primary type of contraception used [categorized as long-acting reversible contraception (LARCs), other prescription methods, nonprescription methods or no method] is modeled using multinomial logistic regression, with predictors representing the timing and strength of pregnancy intentions, pregnancy history, pregnancy risk exposure and sociodemographics. Results LARCs were used by 8.4% of the sample; other prescription methods (primarily oral contraceptives), 49.6%; nonprescription methods (primarily condoms), 30.4%; and no method, 11.5%. Pregnancy intentions predicted use of LARCs and other prescription methods compared with no method. The most consistent predictors of using all categories of contraception were pregnancy risk exposure measures (partnership type and frequency of sexual intercourse). Conclusions In the absence of cost-sharing for contraception, women's choice of prescription contraception was a function primarily of pregnancy risk exposure rather than pregnancy intentions. Implications This study is among the first to examine privately insured women's contraception choices in the context of contraceptive coverage without cost-sharing; it shows that use of prescription contraception is predicted by pregnancy risk exposure and pregnancy intentions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)501-507
Number of pages7
JournalContraception
Volume92
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Contraceptive Agents
Contraception
Costs and Cost Analysis
Pregnancy
Prescriptions
Cost Sharing
Reproductive History
Coitus
Condoms
Oral Contraceptives
Randomized Controlled Trials
Logistic Models
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

@article{360a5e7329dd4c1cb65d7efd9bde2e12,
title = "How do pregnancy intentions affect contraceptive choices when cost is not a factor? A study of privately insured women",
abstract = "Objective The objective was to test the hypothesis that among privately insured women who have contraceptive coverage without cost-sharing, using prescription contraception is predicted primarily by pregnancy intentions. Study design Participants are 987 women ages 18-40 who wish to avoid pregnancy for at least the next 12 months and are enrolled in Highmark Health plans in Pennsylvania. Data are from the baseline survey of MyNewOptions, an ongoing randomized controlled trial testing an intervention to help insured women make optimum contraceptive choices. Primary type of contraception used [categorized as long-acting reversible contraception (LARCs), other prescription methods, nonprescription methods or no method] is modeled using multinomial logistic regression, with predictors representing the timing and strength of pregnancy intentions, pregnancy history, pregnancy risk exposure and sociodemographics. Results LARCs were used by 8.4{\%} of the sample; other prescription methods (primarily oral contraceptives), 49.6{\%}; nonprescription methods (primarily condoms), 30.4{\%}; and no method, 11.5{\%}. Pregnancy intentions predicted use of LARCs and other prescription methods compared with no method. The most consistent predictors of using all categories of contraception were pregnancy risk exposure measures (partnership type and frequency of sexual intercourse). Conclusions In the absence of cost-sharing for contraception, women's choice of prescription contraception was a function primarily of pregnancy risk exposure rather than pregnancy intentions. Implications This study is among the first to examine privately insured women's contraception choices in the context of contraceptive coverage without cost-sharing; it shows that use of prescription contraception is predicted by pregnancy risk exposure and pregnancy intentions.",
author = "Weisman, {Carol S.} and Lehman, {Erik B.} and Legro, {Richard S.} and Velott, {Diana L.} and Chuang, {Cynthia H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2015.05.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "501--507",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

How do pregnancy intentions affect contraceptive choices when cost is not a factor? A study of privately insured women. / Weisman, Carol S.; Lehman, Erik B.; Legro, Richard S.; Velott, Diana L.; Chuang, Cynthia H.

In: Contraception, Vol. 92, No. 5, 01.11.2015, p. 501-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do pregnancy intentions affect contraceptive choices when cost is not a factor? A study of privately insured women

AU - Weisman, Carol S.

AU - Lehman, Erik B.

AU - Legro, Richard S.

AU - Velott, Diana L.

AU - Chuang, Cynthia H.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Objective The objective was to test the hypothesis that among privately insured women who have contraceptive coverage without cost-sharing, using prescription contraception is predicted primarily by pregnancy intentions. Study design Participants are 987 women ages 18-40 who wish to avoid pregnancy for at least the next 12 months and are enrolled in Highmark Health plans in Pennsylvania. Data are from the baseline survey of MyNewOptions, an ongoing randomized controlled trial testing an intervention to help insured women make optimum contraceptive choices. Primary type of contraception used [categorized as long-acting reversible contraception (LARCs), other prescription methods, nonprescription methods or no method] is modeled using multinomial logistic regression, with predictors representing the timing and strength of pregnancy intentions, pregnancy history, pregnancy risk exposure and sociodemographics. Results LARCs were used by 8.4% of the sample; other prescription methods (primarily oral contraceptives), 49.6%; nonprescription methods (primarily condoms), 30.4%; and no method, 11.5%. Pregnancy intentions predicted use of LARCs and other prescription methods compared with no method. The most consistent predictors of using all categories of contraception were pregnancy risk exposure measures (partnership type and frequency of sexual intercourse). Conclusions In the absence of cost-sharing for contraception, women's choice of prescription contraception was a function primarily of pregnancy risk exposure rather than pregnancy intentions. Implications This study is among the first to examine privately insured women's contraception choices in the context of contraceptive coverage without cost-sharing; it shows that use of prescription contraception is predicted by pregnancy risk exposure and pregnancy intentions.

AB - Objective The objective was to test the hypothesis that among privately insured women who have contraceptive coverage without cost-sharing, using prescription contraception is predicted primarily by pregnancy intentions. Study design Participants are 987 women ages 18-40 who wish to avoid pregnancy for at least the next 12 months and are enrolled in Highmark Health plans in Pennsylvania. Data are from the baseline survey of MyNewOptions, an ongoing randomized controlled trial testing an intervention to help insured women make optimum contraceptive choices. Primary type of contraception used [categorized as long-acting reversible contraception (LARCs), other prescription methods, nonprescription methods or no method] is modeled using multinomial logistic regression, with predictors representing the timing and strength of pregnancy intentions, pregnancy history, pregnancy risk exposure and sociodemographics. Results LARCs were used by 8.4% of the sample; other prescription methods (primarily oral contraceptives), 49.6%; nonprescription methods (primarily condoms), 30.4%; and no method, 11.5%. Pregnancy intentions predicted use of LARCs and other prescription methods compared with no method. The most consistent predictors of using all categories of contraception were pregnancy risk exposure measures (partnership type and frequency of sexual intercourse). Conclusions In the absence of cost-sharing for contraception, women's choice of prescription contraception was a function primarily of pregnancy risk exposure rather than pregnancy intentions. Implications This study is among the first to examine privately insured women's contraception choices in the context of contraceptive coverage without cost-sharing; it shows that use of prescription contraception is predicted by pregnancy risk exposure and pregnancy intentions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945476539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945476539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.05.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 26002807

AN - SCOPUS:84945476539

VL - 92

SP - 501

EP - 507

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 5

ER -