How do varied populations interact with embodied conversational agents? Findings from inner-city adolescents and prisoners

Robert C. Hubal, Diana H. Fishbein, Monica S. Sheppard, Mallie J. Paschall, Diana L. Eldreth, Christopher T. Hyde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to identify individual characteristics that predict behavioral responses to violence prevention interventions. These studies used embodied conversational agents (ECAs) to create hypothetical social situations (called virtual vignettes) to assess interpersonal competency skills. One study was of male inner-city African-American adolescents, and the second was of male prisoners in a state correctional system. In pre- and post-intervention sessions, participants interacted with an ECA that tried to entice them into making risky decisions. The virtual vignette sessions tested participants' negotiation and conflict resolution skills. Results showed differing tendencies for participants to be engaged by the virtual vignettes. The vignettes were sufficiently realistic to elicit differences in behavior among the adolescents, but generally not for the prisoners. Prior acceptance, accessibility, and usability data suggest that most users readily accept ECAs as valid conversational partners. The evidence presented here suggests that the technology - or the setting in which the technology is used - is not by itself sufficient to actively engage users. The usefulness of virtual vignettes to adequately predict future behavior may be at least partially influenced by participant characteristics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1104-1138
Number of pages35
JournalComputers in Human Behavior
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2008

Fingerprint

Prisoners
Negotiating
Technology
Adolescent Behavior
Violence
African Americans
Population
Decision Making
Decision making
Inner City
Vignettes
Social Skills

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Hubal, Robert C. ; Fishbein, Diana H. ; Sheppard, Monica S. ; Paschall, Mallie J. ; Eldreth, Diana L. ; Hyde, Christopher T. / How do varied populations interact with embodied conversational agents? Findings from inner-city adolescents and prisoners. In: Computers in Human Behavior. 2008 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 1104-1138.
@article{c33ef37b412c488384fa0df05aa9e8cc,
title = "How do varied populations interact with embodied conversational agents? Findings from inner-city adolescents and prisoners",
abstract = "Two studies were conducted to identify individual characteristics that predict behavioral responses to violence prevention interventions. These studies used embodied conversational agents (ECAs) to create hypothetical social situations (called virtual vignettes) to assess interpersonal competency skills. One study was of male inner-city African-American adolescents, and the second was of male prisoners in a state correctional system. In pre- and post-intervention sessions, participants interacted with an ECA that tried to entice them into making risky decisions. The virtual vignette sessions tested participants' negotiation and conflict resolution skills. Results showed differing tendencies for participants to be engaged by the virtual vignettes. The vignettes were sufficiently realistic to elicit differences in behavior among the adolescents, but generally not for the prisoners. Prior acceptance, accessibility, and usability data suggest that most users readily accept ECAs as valid conversational partners. The evidence presented here suggests that the technology - or the setting in which the technology is used - is not by itself sufficient to actively engage users. The usefulness of virtual vignettes to adequately predict future behavior may be at least partially influenced by participant characteristics.",
author = "Hubal, {Robert C.} and Fishbein, {Diana H.} and Sheppard, {Monica S.} and Paschall, {Mallie J.} and Eldreth, {Diana L.} and Hyde, {Christopher T.}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1104--1138",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

How do varied populations interact with embodied conversational agents? Findings from inner-city adolescents and prisoners. / Hubal, Robert C.; Fishbein, Diana H.; Sheppard, Monica S.; Paschall, Mallie J.; Eldreth, Diana L.; Hyde, Christopher T.

In: Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.05.2008, p. 1104-1138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do varied populations interact with embodied conversational agents? Findings from inner-city adolescents and prisoners

AU - Hubal, Robert C.

AU - Fishbein, Diana H.

AU - Sheppard, Monica S.

AU - Paschall, Mallie J.

AU - Eldreth, Diana L.

AU - Hyde, Christopher T.

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - Two studies were conducted to identify individual characteristics that predict behavioral responses to violence prevention interventions. These studies used embodied conversational agents (ECAs) to create hypothetical social situations (called virtual vignettes) to assess interpersonal competency skills. One study was of male inner-city African-American adolescents, and the second was of male prisoners in a state correctional system. In pre- and post-intervention sessions, participants interacted with an ECA that tried to entice them into making risky decisions. The virtual vignette sessions tested participants' negotiation and conflict resolution skills. Results showed differing tendencies for participants to be engaged by the virtual vignettes. The vignettes were sufficiently realistic to elicit differences in behavior among the adolescents, but generally not for the prisoners. Prior acceptance, accessibility, and usability data suggest that most users readily accept ECAs as valid conversational partners. The evidence presented here suggests that the technology - or the setting in which the technology is used - is not by itself sufficient to actively engage users. The usefulness of virtual vignettes to adequately predict future behavior may be at least partially influenced by participant characteristics.

AB - Two studies were conducted to identify individual characteristics that predict behavioral responses to violence prevention interventions. These studies used embodied conversational agents (ECAs) to create hypothetical social situations (called virtual vignettes) to assess interpersonal competency skills. One study was of male inner-city African-American adolescents, and the second was of male prisoners in a state correctional system. In pre- and post-intervention sessions, participants interacted with an ECA that tried to entice them into making risky decisions. The virtual vignette sessions tested participants' negotiation and conflict resolution skills. Results showed differing tendencies for participants to be engaged by the virtual vignettes. The vignettes were sufficiently realistic to elicit differences in behavior among the adolescents, but generally not for the prisoners. Prior acceptance, accessibility, and usability data suggest that most users readily accept ECAs as valid conversational partners. The evidence presented here suggests that the technology - or the setting in which the technology is used - is not by itself sufficient to actively engage users. The usefulness of virtual vignettes to adequately predict future behavior may be at least partially influenced by participant characteristics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39849094511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39849094511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.010

DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:39849094511

VL - 24

SP - 1104

EP - 1138

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

IS - 3

ER -