How frequency and intensity shape diversity-disturbance relationships

Adam D. Miller, Stephen H. Roxburgh, Katriona Shea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

109 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between disturbance regimes and species diversity has been of central interest to ecologists for decades. For example, the intermediate disturbance hypothesis proposes that diversity will be highest at intermediate levels of disturbance. Although peaked (hump-shaped) diversity-disturbance relationships (DDRs) have been documented in nature, many other DDRs have been reported as well. Here, we begin to theoretically unify these diverse empirical findings by showing how a single simple model can generate several different DDRs, depending on the aspect of disturbance that is considered. Additionally, we elucidate the competition-mediated mechanism underlying our results. Our findings have the potential to reconcile apparently conflicting empirical results on the effects of disturbance on diversity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5643-5648
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume108
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 5 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Cite this

@article{c0487e931bab4de380feb0efedd38618,
title = "How frequency and intensity shape diversity-disturbance relationships",
abstract = "Understanding the relationship between disturbance regimes and species diversity has been of central interest to ecologists for decades. For example, the intermediate disturbance hypothesis proposes that diversity will be highest at intermediate levels of disturbance. Although peaked (hump-shaped) diversity-disturbance relationships (DDRs) have been documented in nature, many other DDRs have been reported as well. Here, we begin to theoretically unify these diverse empirical findings by showing how a single simple model can generate several different DDRs, depending on the aspect of disturbance that is considered. Additionally, we elucidate the competition-mediated mechanism underlying our results. Our findings have the potential to reconcile apparently conflicting empirical results on the effects of disturbance on diversity.",
author = "Miller, {Adam D.} and Roxburgh, {Stephen H.} and Katriona Shea",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1018594108",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "5643--5648",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "14",

}

How frequency and intensity shape diversity-disturbance relationships. / Miller, Adam D.; Roxburgh, Stephen H.; Shea, Katriona.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 108, No. 14, 05.04.2011, p. 5643-5648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How frequency and intensity shape diversity-disturbance relationships

AU - Miller, Adam D.

AU - Roxburgh, Stephen H.

AU - Shea, Katriona

PY - 2011/4/5

Y1 - 2011/4/5

N2 - Understanding the relationship between disturbance regimes and species diversity has been of central interest to ecologists for decades. For example, the intermediate disturbance hypothesis proposes that diversity will be highest at intermediate levels of disturbance. Although peaked (hump-shaped) diversity-disturbance relationships (DDRs) have been documented in nature, many other DDRs have been reported as well. Here, we begin to theoretically unify these diverse empirical findings by showing how a single simple model can generate several different DDRs, depending on the aspect of disturbance that is considered. Additionally, we elucidate the competition-mediated mechanism underlying our results. Our findings have the potential to reconcile apparently conflicting empirical results on the effects of disturbance on diversity.

AB - Understanding the relationship between disturbance regimes and species diversity has been of central interest to ecologists for decades. For example, the intermediate disturbance hypothesis proposes that diversity will be highest at intermediate levels of disturbance. Although peaked (hump-shaped) diversity-disturbance relationships (DDRs) have been documented in nature, many other DDRs have been reported as well. Here, we begin to theoretically unify these diverse empirical findings by showing how a single simple model can generate several different DDRs, depending on the aspect of disturbance that is considered. Additionally, we elucidate the competition-mediated mechanism underlying our results. Our findings have the potential to reconcile apparently conflicting empirical results on the effects of disturbance on diversity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955004122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955004122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1018594108

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1018594108

M3 - Article

C2 - 21422284

AN - SCOPUS:79955004122

VL - 108

SP - 5643

EP - 5648

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 14

ER -