How have we, do we, and will we measure time perspective? A review of methodological and measurement issues

Susan Mohammed, Jacqueline T. Marhefka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite the demonstrated importance of time perspective on key outcomes, its growing popularity, and its wide reach in terms of samples and disciplines, the construct has been plagued with definitional and measurement problems since its inception. Given the historical and current confusion regarding both conceptualization and operationalization, the purpose of this article is to provide an overview of methodological and measurement issues related to time perspective. Clearly, definitional and measurement clarity are critical for the success of future research. Through integrating the fragmented and eclectic time perspective literature fraught with ambiguity, we help to clarify measurement options and their psychometric evidence for future researchers. Specifically, we provide an in-depth comparison of four (and their offshoots) commonly used, scale-based measures of time perspective with respect to their dimensional content, psychometric properties, and validation evidence. We end with recommendations for time perspective research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
psychometrics
operationalization
popularity
evidence
Research Personnel
time
Time perspective
Research
literature
Conceptualization
Operationalization

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Psychology(all)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{ccfd3fda8fbc407e8ea8d73d1751b382,
title = "How have we, do we, and will we measure time perspective? A review of methodological and measurement issues",
abstract = "Despite the demonstrated importance of time perspective on key outcomes, its growing popularity, and its wide reach in terms of samples and disciplines, the construct has been plagued with definitional and measurement problems since its inception. Given the historical and current confusion regarding both conceptualization and operationalization, the purpose of this article is to provide an overview of methodological and measurement issues related to time perspective. Clearly, definitional and measurement clarity are critical for the success of future research. Through integrating the fragmented and eclectic time perspective literature fraught with ambiguity, we help to clarify measurement options and their psychometric evidence for future researchers. Specifically, we provide an in-depth comparison of four (and their offshoots) commonly used, scale-based measures of time perspective with respect to their dimensional content, psychometric properties, and validation evidence. We end with recommendations for time perspective research.",
author = "Susan Mohammed and Marhefka, {Jacqueline T.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/job.2414",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Behavior",
issn = "0894-3796",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How have we, do we, and will we measure time perspective? A review of methodological and measurement issues

AU - Mohammed, Susan

AU - Marhefka, Jacqueline T.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Despite the demonstrated importance of time perspective on key outcomes, its growing popularity, and its wide reach in terms of samples and disciplines, the construct has been plagued with definitional and measurement problems since its inception. Given the historical and current confusion regarding both conceptualization and operationalization, the purpose of this article is to provide an overview of methodological and measurement issues related to time perspective. Clearly, definitional and measurement clarity are critical for the success of future research. Through integrating the fragmented and eclectic time perspective literature fraught with ambiguity, we help to clarify measurement options and their psychometric evidence for future researchers. Specifically, we provide an in-depth comparison of four (and their offshoots) commonly used, scale-based measures of time perspective with respect to their dimensional content, psychometric properties, and validation evidence. We end with recommendations for time perspective research.

AB - Despite the demonstrated importance of time perspective on key outcomes, its growing popularity, and its wide reach in terms of samples and disciplines, the construct has been plagued with definitional and measurement problems since its inception. Given the historical and current confusion regarding both conceptualization and operationalization, the purpose of this article is to provide an overview of methodological and measurement issues related to time perspective. Clearly, definitional and measurement clarity are critical for the success of future research. Through integrating the fragmented and eclectic time perspective literature fraught with ambiguity, we help to clarify measurement options and their psychometric evidence for future researchers. Specifically, we provide an in-depth comparison of four (and their offshoots) commonly used, scale-based measures of time perspective with respect to their dimensional content, psychometric properties, and validation evidence. We end with recommendations for time perspective research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073777475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073777475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/job.2414

DO - 10.1002/job.2414

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073777475

JO - Journal of Organizational Behavior

JF - Journal of Organizational Behavior

SN - 0894-3796

ER -