How intense policy demanders shape postreform politics: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act

Philip Rocco, Simon F. Haeder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations


The implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been a politically volatile process. The ACA's institutional design and delayed feedback effects created a windowof opportunity for its partisan opponents to launch challenges at both the federal and state level.Yet as recent research suggests, postreformpolitics depends on more than policy feedback alone; rather, it is shaped by the partisan and interestgroup environment. We argue that "intense policy demanders" played an important role in defining the policy alternatives that comprised congressional Republicans' efforts to repeal and replace the ACA. To test this argument, we drew on an original data set of bill introductions in the House of Representatives between 2011 and 2016. Our analysis suggests that business contributions and political ideology affected the likelihood that House Republicans would introduce measures repealing significant portions of the ACA. A secondary analysis shows that intense policy demanders also shaped the vote on House Republicans' initial ACA replacement plan. These findings highlight the role intense policy demanders can play in shaping the postreform political agenda.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-304
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of health politics, policy and law
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy


Dive into the research topics of 'How intense policy demanders shape postreform politics: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this