How much is too much? The development and validation of the exercise dependence scale

Heather A. Hausenblas, Danielle Symons Downs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

206 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents five studies with 2,420 total participants on the development and validation of the Exercise Dependence Scale (EDS), which is conceptualized based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV (APA, 1994) criteria for substance dependence, and differentiates among at-risk, nondependent-symptomatic, and nondependent-asymptomatic exercisers. Results of the studies revealed evidence for the a priori hypothesized components, acceptable test-retest and internal consistency reliability, and content and concurrent validity of the EDS. Individuals at-risk for exercise dependence reported more strenuous exercise, perfectionism, and self-efficacy compared to the nondependent groups. The findings provide initial support for the EDS and indicate the need for a multifaceted approach to its conceptualization and measurement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-404
Number of pages18
JournalPsychology and Health
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2002

Fingerprint

Self Efficacy
Substance-Related Disorders
Perfectionism

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{d88cb143db474375859a3e5266c9fd40,
title = "How much is too much? The development and validation of the exercise dependence scale",
abstract = "This paper presents five studies with 2,420 total participants on the development and validation of the Exercise Dependence Scale (EDS), which is conceptualized based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV (APA, 1994) criteria for substance dependence, and differentiates among at-risk, nondependent-symptomatic, and nondependent-asymptomatic exercisers. Results of the studies revealed evidence for the a priori hypothesized components, acceptable test-retest and internal consistency reliability, and content and concurrent validity of the EDS. Individuals at-risk for exercise dependence reported more strenuous exercise, perfectionism, and self-efficacy compared to the nondependent groups. The findings provide initial support for the EDS and indicate the need for a multifaceted approach to its conceptualization and measurement.",
author = "Hausenblas, {Heather A.} and Downs, {Danielle Symons}",
year = "2002",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0887044022000004894",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "387--404",
journal = "Psychology and Health",
issn = "0887-0446",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

How much is too much? The development and validation of the exercise dependence scale. / Hausenblas, Heather A.; Downs, Danielle Symons.

In: Psychology and Health, Vol. 17, No. 4, 01.08.2002, p. 387-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How much is too much? The development and validation of the exercise dependence scale

AU - Hausenblas, Heather A.

AU - Downs, Danielle Symons

PY - 2002/8/1

Y1 - 2002/8/1

N2 - This paper presents five studies with 2,420 total participants on the development and validation of the Exercise Dependence Scale (EDS), which is conceptualized based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV (APA, 1994) criteria for substance dependence, and differentiates among at-risk, nondependent-symptomatic, and nondependent-asymptomatic exercisers. Results of the studies revealed evidence for the a priori hypothesized components, acceptable test-retest and internal consistency reliability, and content and concurrent validity of the EDS. Individuals at-risk for exercise dependence reported more strenuous exercise, perfectionism, and self-efficacy compared to the nondependent groups. The findings provide initial support for the EDS and indicate the need for a multifaceted approach to its conceptualization and measurement.

AB - This paper presents five studies with 2,420 total participants on the development and validation of the Exercise Dependence Scale (EDS), which is conceptualized based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV (APA, 1994) criteria for substance dependence, and differentiates among at-risk, nondependent-symptomatic, and nondependent-asymptomatic exercisers. Results of the studies revealed evidence for the a priori hypothesized components, acceptable test-retest and internal consistency reliability, and content and concurrent validity of the EDS. Individuals at-risk for exercise dependence reported more strenuous exercise, perfectionism, and self-efficacy compared to the nondependent groups. The findings provide initial support for the EDS and indicate the need for a multifaceted approach to its conceptualization and measurement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036021669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036021669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0887044022000004894

DO - 10.1080/0887044022000004894

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036021669

VL - 17

SP - 387

EP - 404

JO - Psychology and Health

JF - Psychology and Health

SN - 0887-0446

IS - 4

ER -