TY - JOUR
T1 - How persons with transtibial amputation regulate lateral stepping while walking in laterally destabilizing environments
AU - Dingwell, Jonathan B.
AU - Cusumano, Joseph P.
AU - Rylander, Jonathan H.
AU - Wilken, Jason M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was partly funded by the National Institutes of Health (grant # 1-R01-HD059844 ) and by the US Department of Defense (CDMRP/BADER Consortium W81XWH-11-2-0222 ). Sponsors were not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, writing of the manuscript, or decision to submit for publication. The authors thank Mr. Eduardo J. Beltran and Dr. Rainer Beurskens for assistance with data collection, Ms. Emily Sinitski and Dr. Kevin Terry for assistance with data collection and processing, and Dr. Riley C. Sheehan for assistance with data processing and analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Background: Persons with lower limb amputation often experience decreased physical capacity, difficulty walking, and increased fall risk. To either prevent or recover from a loss of balance, one must effectively regulate their stepping movements. It is therefore critical to identify how well persons with amputation regulate stepping. Here, we used a multi-objective control framework based on Goal Equivalent Manifolds to identify how persons with transtibial amputation (TTA) regulate lateral stepping while walking without and with lateral perturbations. Research question: When walking in destabilizing environments, do otherwise healthy persons with TTA exhibit greater difficulty regulating lateral stepping due to impaired control? Or do they instead continue to use similar strategies to regulate lateral stepping despite their amputation? Methods: Eight persons with unilateral TTA and thirteen able-bodied (AB) controls walked in a virtual environment under three conditions: no perturbations, laterally oscillating visual field, and laterally oscillating treadmill platform. We analyzed step-to-step time series of step widths and absolute lateral body positions. We computed means, standard deviations and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis scaling exponents for each time series and computed how much participants directly corrected step width and position deviations at each step. We compared our results to computational predictions to identify the underlying causes of our experimental findings. Results: All participants exhibited significantly increased variability, decreased scaling exponents, and tighter direct control when perturbed. Simulations from our stepping regulation models revealed that people responded to the increased variability produced by the imposed perturbations by tightening their control of both step width and lateral position. Participants with TTA exhibited only a few minor differences from AB in lateral stepping regulation, even when subjected to substantially destabilizing lateral perturbations. Significance: Since control of stepping is intrinsically multi-objective, developing effective interventions to reduce fall risk in persons with amputation will likely require strategies that adopt multi-objective approaches.
AB - Background: Persons with lower limb amputation often experience decreased physical capacity, difficulty walking, and increased fall risk. To either prevent or recover from a loss of balance, one must effectively regulate their stepping movements. It is therefore critical to identify how well persons with amputation regulate stepping. Here, we used a multi-objective control framework based on Goal Equivalent Manifolds to identify how persons with transtibial amputation (TTA) regulate lateral stepping while walking without and with lateral perturbations. Research question: When walking in destabilizing environments, do otherwise healthy persons with TTA exhibit greater difficulty regulating lateral stepping due to impaired control? Or do they instead continue to use similar strategies to regulate lateral stepping despite their amputation? Methods: Eight persons with unilateral TTA and thirteen able-bodied (AB) controls walked in a virtual environment under three conditions: no perturbations, laterally oscillating visual field, and laterally oscillating treadmill platform. We analyzed step-to-step time series of step widths and absolute lateral body positions. We computed means, standard deviations and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis scaling exponents for each time series and computed how much participants directly corrected step width and position deviations at each step. We compared our results to computational predictions to identify the underlying causes of our experimental findings. Results: All participants exhibited significantly increased variability, decreased scaling exponents, and tighter direct control when perturbed. Simulations from our stepping regulation models revealed that people responded to the increased variability produced by the imposed perturbations by tightening their control of both step width and lateral position. Participants with TTA exhibited only a few minor differences from AB in lateral stepping regulation, even when subjected to substantially destabilizing lateral perturbations. Significance: Since control of stepping is intrinsically multi-objective, developing effective interventions to reduce fall risk in persons with amputation will likely require strategies that adopt multi-objective approaches.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093099485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85093099485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.031
DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 33099136
AN - SCOPUS:85093099485
SN - 0966-6362
VL - 83
SP - 88
EP - 95
JO - Gait and Posture
JF - Gait and Posture
ER -