How pervasive is mind wandering, really?

Paul Seli, Roger Beaty, James Allan Cheyne, Daniel Smilek, Jonathan Oakman, Daniel L. Schacter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent claims that people spend 30–50% of their waking lives mind wandering (Killingsworth & Gilbert, 2010; Kane et al., 2007) have become widely accepted and frequently cited. While acknowledging attention to be inconstant and wavering, and mind wandering to be ubiquitous, we argue and present evidence that such simple quantitative estimates are misleading and potentially meaningless without serious qualification. Mind-wandering estimates requiring dichotomous judgments of inner experience rely on questionable assumptions about how such judgments are made, and the resulting data do not permit straightforward interpretation. We present evidence that estimates of daily-life mind wandering vary dramatically depending on the response options provided. Offering participants a range of options in estimating task engagement yielded variable mind-wandering estimates, from approximately 60% to 10%, depending on assumptions made about how observers make introspective judgments about their mind-wandering experiences and how they understand what it means to be on- or off-task.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-78
Number of pages5
JournalConsciousness and Cognition
Volume66
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Seli, P., Beaty, R., Cheyne, J. A., Smilek, D., Oakman, J., & Schacter, D. L. (2018). How pervasive is mind wandering, really? Consciousness and Cognition, 66, 74-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.10.002
Seli, Paul ; Beaty, Roger ; Cheyne, James Allan ; Smilek, Daniel ; Oakman, Jonathan ; Schacter, Daniel L. / How pervasive is mind wandering, really?. In: Consciousness and Cognition. 2018 ; Vol. 66. pp. 74-78.
@article{4f67673f260845ebb01bb4b05e4bf11b,
title = "How pervasive is mind wandering, really?",
abstract = "Recent claims that people spend 30–50{\%} of their waking lives mind wandering (Killingsworth & Gilbert, 2010; Kane et al., 2007) have become widely accepted and frequently cited. While acknowledging attention to be inconstant and wavering, and mind wandering to be ubiquitous, we argue and present evidence that such simple quantitative estimates are misleading and potentially meaningless without serious qualification. Mind-wandering estimates requiring dichotomous judgments of inner experience rely on questionable assumptions about how such judgments are made, and the resulting data do not permit straightforward interpretation. We present evidence that estimates of daily-life mind wandering vary dramatically depending on the response options provided. Offering participants a range of options in estimating task engagement yielded variable mind-wandering estimates, from approximately 60{\%} to 10{\%}, depending on assumptions made about how observers make introspective judgments about their mind-wandering experiences and how they understand what it means to be on- or off-task.",
author = "Paul Seli and Roger Beaty and Cheyne, {James Allan} and Daniel Smilek and Jonathan Oakman and Schacter, {Daniel L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.concog.2018.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "74--78",
journal = "Consciousness and Cognition",
issn = "1053-8100",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Seli, P, Beaty, R, Cheyne, JA, Smilek, D, Oakman, J & Schacter, DL 2018, 'How pervasive is mind wandering, really?', Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 66, pp. 74-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.10.002

How pervasive is mind wandering, really? / Seli, Paul; Beaty, Roger; Cheyne, James Allan; Smilek, Daniel; Oakman, Jonathan; Schacter, Daniel L.

In: Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 66, 01.11.2018, p. 74-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How pervasive is mind wandering, really?

AU - Seli, Paul

AU - Beaty, Roger

AU - Cheyne, James Allan

AU - Smilek, Daniel

AU - Oakman, Jonathan

AU - Schacter, Daniel L.

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Recent claims that people spend 30–50% of their waking lives mind wandering (Killingsworth & Gilbert, 2010; Kane et al., 2007) have become widely accepted and frequently cited. While acknowledging attention to be inconstant and wavering, and mind wandering to be ubiquitous, we argue and present evidence that such simple quantitative estimates are misleading and potentially meaningless without serious qualification. Mind-wandering estimates requiring dichotomous judgments of inner experience rely on questionable assumptions about how such judgments are made, and the resulting data do not permit straightforward interpretation. We present evidence that estimates of daily-life mind wandering vary dramatically depending on the response options provided. Offering participants a range of options in estimating task engagement yielded variable mind-wandering estimates, from approximately 60% to 10%, depending on assumptions made about how observers make introspective judgments about their mind-wandering experiences and how they understand what it means to be on- or off-task.

AB - Recent claims that people spend 30–50% of their waking lives mind wandering (Killingsworth & Gilbert, 2010; Kane et al., 2007) have become widely accepted and frequently cited. While acknowledging attention to be inconstant and wavering, and mind wandering to be ubiquitous, we argue and present evidence that such simple quantitative estimates are misleading and potentially meaningless without serious qualification. Mind-wandering estimates requiring dichotomous judgments of inner experience rely on questionable assumptions about how such judgments are made, and the resulting data do not permit straightforward interpretation. We present evidence that estimates of daily-life mind wandering vary dramatically depending on the response options provided. Offering participants a range of options in estimating task engagement yielded variable mind-wandering estimates, from approximately 60% to 10%, depending on assumptions made about how observers make introspective judgments about their mind-wandering experiences and how they understand what it means to be on- or off-task.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055975184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055975184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.concog.2018.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.concog.2018.10.002

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 74

EP - 78

JO - Consciousness and Cognition

JF - Consciousness and Cognition

SN - 1053-8100

ER -