TY - JOUR
T1 - How to make an Inca mummy
T2 - Andean embalming, Peruvian science, and the collection of empire
AU - Heaney, Christopher
N1 - Funding Information:
Christopher Heaney is an assistant professor of history at the Pennsylvania State University, and a Barra Postdoctoral Fellow at the McNeil Center for Early American Studies at the University of Pennsylvania. This article is part of a larger project on the history of the collection, study, and display of the Peruvian dead. He is the author of Cradle of Gold (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), a history of the scientific excavation of Machu Picchu. Pennsylvania State University, College of the Liberal Arts, Department of History, 108 Weaver Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA; cuh282@psu.edu. Acknowledgments. The writing of this article was supported by the McNeil Center for Early American Studies. Earlier versions benefited from critiques offered by participants in the History and Sociology of Science Workshop Series at the University of Pennsylvania, the Latin America and the Global History of Knowledge (LAGLOBAL) Network, the Southwest Seminar Consortium on Colonial Latin America, and at conferences of the World Congress on Mummy Studies and the American Historical Association. I owe special thanks to Benjamin Breen, Jorge Cañizares-Esguerra, and Frank Salomon for asking the questions that this article sought to answer, and to R. Alan Covey, Sonia E. Guillén, Bianca Premo, Susan E. Ramírez, and Cameron Strang, whose commentaries questioned that answer’s meaning. Finally, I am most grateful to H. Floris Cohen and my three Isis referees for the feedback that helped this article reach its final form.
Funding Information:
The writing of this article was supported by the McNeil Center for Early American Studies. Earlier versions benefited from critiques offered by participants in the History and Sociology of Science Workshop Series at the University of Pennsylvania, the Latin America and the Global History of Knowledge (LAGLOBAL) Network, the Southwest Seminar Consortium on Colonial Latin America, and at conferences of the World Congress on Mummy Studies and the American Historical Association. I owe special thanks to Benjamin Breen, Jorge Cañizares-Esguerra, and Frank Salomon for asking the questions that this article sought to answer, and to R. Alan Covey, Sonia E. Guillén, Bianca Premo, Susan E. Ramírez, and Cameron Strang, whose commentaries questioned that answer’s meaning. Finally, I am most grateful to H. Floris Cohen and my three Isis referees for the feedback that helped this article reach its final form.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - As scientific objects, mummies were born of Europe’s encounter with two “ancient” bodily knowledges. The first is well known: the embalmed Egyptian dead who were ground into a materia medica named mumia and later were collected as “mummies” themselves. Yet mummies owe their global possibility— of ancient sciences of embalming and environmental manipulation apprehensible worldwide—to the sixteenth-century Spanish encounter with the Incas’ preserved dead, the yllapa. This article argues that their confiscation and display desecrated their sacred affect, but their recategorization as “embalmed” bodies allowed Indigenous Peruvian writers to argue for the Incas’ lost medical sophistication. European scholars then used that sophistication to establish “mummies” as a comparative category. The original yllapas decayed, blurring both Inca sovereignty and the colonial Latin American sciences that anatomized it, but their imagined resurrection in the preserved bodies of other “ancient Peruvians” turned the “Inca mummy” into a highly collectible scientific object, embodying a newly national past of ancient learning and anti-imperial indictment.
AB - As scientific objects, mummies were born of Europe’s encounter with two “ancient” bodily knowledges. The first is well known: the embalmed Egyptian dead who were ground into a materia medica named mumia and later were collected as “mummies” themselves. Yet mummies owe their global possibility— of ancient sciences of embalming and environmental manipulation apprehensible worldwide—to the sixteenth-century Spanish encounter with the Incas’ preserved dead, the yllapa. This article argues that their confiscation and display desecrated their sacred affect, but their recategorization as “embalmed” bodies allowed Indigenous Peruvian writers to argue for the Incas’ lost medical sophistication. European scholars then used that sophistication to establish “mummies” as a comparative category. The original yllapas decayed, blurring both Inca sovereignty and the colonial Latin American sciences that anatomized it, but their imagined resurrection in the preserved bodies of other “ancient Peruvians” turned the “Inca mummy” into a highly collectible scientific object, embodying a newly national past of ancient learning and anti-imperial indictment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043324386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043324386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/697020
DO - 10.1086/697020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85043324386
SN - 0021-1753
VL - 109
SP - 1
EP - 27
JO - Isis
JF - Isis
IS - 1
ER -