How urbanites define their neighborhoods

Avery M. Guest, Barrett Alan Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores the ways that residents of the Seattle metropolitan region define "neighborhood" in the abstract and their own neighborhoods in particular. On the whole, the neighborhood is regarded as a relatively limited unit, both in terms of areal size and functional relevance. Two major dimensions of neighborhood definition are evident. Individuals tend to define neighborhood primarily in terms of either human interaction or pure space, and they also differ in their views on its geographic size and institutional development. The two dimensions of definition are shown to vary with patterns of local activity, social-demographic characteristics, and the physical environment. While only a small proportion of the variation in responses is explained, the results suggest that neighborhood definitions are rational responses to the social and physical position of the respondent within urban society.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)32-56
Number of pages25
JournalPopulation and Environment
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 1984

Fingerprint

urban society
institutional development
metropolitan region
resident
interaction
physical environment
Society

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Demography
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Guest, Avery M. ; Lee, Barrett Alan. / How urbanites define their neighborhoods. In: Population and Environment. 1984 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 32-56.
@article{d6a22df366964e36850e6c5b6bee935c,
title = "How urbanites define their neighborhoods",
abstract = "This paper explores the ways that residents of the Seattle metropolitan region define {"}neighborhood{"} in the abstract and their own neighborhoods in particular. On the whole, the neighborhood is regarded as a relatively limited unit, both in terms of areal size and functional relevance. Two major dimensions of neighborhood definition are evident. Individuals tend to define neighborhood primarily in terms of either human interaction or pure space, and they also differ in their views on its geographic size and institutional development. The two dimensions of definition are shown to vary with patterns of local activity, social-demographic characteristics, and the physical environment. While only a small proportion of the variation in responses is explained, the results suggest that neighborhood definitions are rational responses to the social and physical position of the respondent within urban society.",
author = "Guest, {Avery M.} and Lee, {Barrett Alan}",
year = "1984",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01257471",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "32--56",
journal = "Population and Environment",
issn = "0199-0039",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

How urbanites define their neighborhoods. / Guest, Avery M.; Lee, Barrett Alan.

In: Population and Environment, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.03.1984, p. 32-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How urbanites define their neighborhoods

AU - Guest, Avery M.

AU - Lee, Barrett Alan

PY - 1984/3/1

Y1 - 1984/3/1

N2 - This paper explores the ways that residents of the Seattle metropolitan region define "neighborhood" in the abstract and their own neighborhoods in particular. On the whole, the neighborhood is regarded as a relatively limited unit, both in terms of areal size and functional relevance. Two major dimensions of neighborhood definition are evident. Individuals tend to define neighborhood primarily in terms of either human interaction or pure space, and they also differ in their views on its geographic size and institutional development. The two dimensions of definition are shown to vary with patterns of local activity, social-demographic characteristics, and the physical environment. While only a small proportion of the variation in responses is explained, the results suggest that neighborhood definitions are rational responses to the social and physical position of the respondent within urban society.

AB - This paper explores the ways that residents of the Seattle metropolitan region define "neighborhood" in the abstract and their own neighborhoods in particular. On the whole, the neighborhood is regarded as a relatively limited unit, both in terms of areal size and functional relevance. Two major dimensions of neighborhood definition are evident. Individuals tend to define neighborhood primarily in terms of either human interaction or pure space, and they also differ in their views on its geographic size and institutional development. The two dimensions of definition are shown to vary with patterns of local activity, social-demographic characteristics, and the physical environment. While only a small proportion of the variation in responses is explained, the results suggest that neighborhood definitions are rational responses to the social and physical position of the respondent within urban society.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0009107305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0009107305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01257471

DO - 10.1007/BF01257471

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0009107305

VL - 7

SP - 32

EP - 56

JO - Population and Environment

JF - Population and Environment

SN - 0199-0039

IS - 1

ER -