How well are the distribution and extreme values of daily precipitation over North America represented in the community climate system model? A comparison to reanalysis, satellite, and gridded station data

Melissa Gervais, John R. Gyakum, Eyad Atallah, L. Bruno Tremblay, Richard B. Neale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An intercomparison of the distribution and extreme values of daily precipitation between the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) and several observational/reanalysis data sources are conducted over the contiguous United States and southern Canada. The use of several data sources, from gridded station, satellite, and reanalysis products, provides a measure of errors in the reference datasets. An examination of specific locations shows that the global climate model (GCM) distributions closely match the observations along the East and West Coasts, with larger discrepancies in the Great Plains and Rockies. In general, the distribution of model precipitation is more positively skewed (more light and less heavy precipitation) in the Great Plains and the eastern United States compared to gridded station observations, a recurring error in GCMs. In the Rocky Mountains the GCMs generally overproduce precipitation relative to the observations and furthermore have a more negatively skewed distribution, with fewer lower daily precipitation values relative to higher values. Extreme precipitation tends to be underestimated in regions and time periods typically characterized by large amounts of convective precipitation. This is shown to be the result of errors in the parameterization of convective precipitation that have been seen in previous model versions. However, comparison against several data sources reveals that model errors in extreme precipitation are approaching the magnitude of the disparity between the reference products. This highlights the existence of large errors in some of the products employed as observations for validation purposes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5219-5239
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Climate
Volume27
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

climate
general circulation model
global climate
climate modeling
parameterization
mountain
North America
station
distribution
comparison
coast
product
plain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

@article{a236120131d148c0bf32548faf9bb929,
title = "How well are the distribution and extreme values of daily precipitation over North America represented in the community climate system model? A comparison to reanalysis, satellite, and gridded station data",
abstract = "An intercomparison of the distribution and extreme values of daily precipitation between the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) and several observational/reanalysis data sources are conducted over the contiguous United States and southern Canada. The use of several data sources, from gridded station, satellite, and reanalysis products, provides a measure of errors in the reference datasets. An examination of specific locations shows that the global climate model (GCM) distributions closely match the observations along the East and West Coasts, with larger discrepancies in the Great Plains and Rockies. In general, the distribution of model precipitation is more positively skewed (more light and less heavy precipitation) in the Great Plains and the eastern United States compared to gridded station observations, a recurring error in GCMs. In the Rocky Mountains the GCMs generally overproduce precipitation relative to the observations and furthermore have a more negatively skewed distribution, with fewer lower daily precipitation values relative to higher values. Extreme precipitation tends to be underestimated in regions and time periods typically characterized by large amounts of convective precipitation. This is shown to be the result of errors in the parameterization of convective precipitation that have been seen in previous model versions. However, comparison against several data sources reveals that model errors in extreme precipitation are approaching the magnitude of the disparity between the reference products. This highlights the existence of large errors in some of the products employed as observations for validation purposes.",
author = "Melissa Gervais and Gyakum, {John R.} and Eyad Atallah and Tremblay, {L. Bruno} and Neale, {Richard B.}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00320.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "5219--5239",
journal = "Journal of Climate",
issn = "0894-8755",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "14",

}

How well are the distribution and extreme values of daily precipitation over North America represented in the community climate system model? A comparison to reanalysis, satellite, and gridded station data. / Gervais, Melissa; Gyakum, John R.; Atallah, Eyad; Tremblay, L. Bruno; Neale, Richard B.

In: Journal of Climate, Vol. 27, No. 14, 07.2014, p. 5219-5239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How well are the distribution and extreme values of daily precipitation over North America represented in the community climate system model? A comparison to reanalysis, satellite, and gridded station data

AU - Gervais, Melissa

AU - Gyakum, John R.

AU - Atallah, Eyad

AU - Tremblay, L. Bruno

AU - Neale, Richard B.

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - An intercomparison of the distribution and extreme values of daily precipitation between the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) and several observational/reanalysis data sources are conducted over the contiguous United States and southern Canada. The use of several data sources, from gridded station, satellite, and reanalysis products, provides a measure of errors in the reference datasets. An examination of specific locations shows that the global climate model (GCM) distributions closely match the observations along the East and West Coasts, with larger discrepancies in the Great Plains and Rockies. In general, the distribution of model precipitation is more positively skewed (more light and less heavy precipitation) in the Great Plains and the eastern United States compared to gridded station observations, a recurring error in GCMs. In the Rocky Mountains the GCMs generally overproduce precipitation relative to the observations and furthermore have a more negatively skewed distribution, with fewer lower daily precipitation values relative to higher values. Extreme precipitation tends to be underestimated in regions and time periods typically characterized by large amounts of convective precipitation. This is shown to be the result of errors in the parameterization of convective precipitation that have been seen in previous model versions. However, comparison against several data sources reveals that model errors in extreme precipitation are approaching the magnitude of the disparity between the reference products. This highlights the existence of large errors in some of the products employed as observations for validation purposes.

AB - An intercomparison of the distribution and extreme values of daily precipitation between the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) and several observational/reanalysis data sources are conducted over the contiguous United States and southern Canada. The use of several data sources, from gridded station, satellite, and reanalysis products, provides a measure of errors in the reference datasets. An examination of specific locations shows that the global climate model (GCM) distributions closely match the observations along the East and West Coasts, with larger discrepancies in the Great Plains and Rockies. In general, the distribution of model precipitation is more positively skewed (more light and less heavy precipitation) in the Great Plains and the eastern United States compared to gridded station observations, a recurring error in GCMs. In the Rocky Mountains the GCMs generally overproduce precipitation relative to the observations and furthermore have a more negatively skewed distribution, with fewer lower daily precipitation values relative to higher values. Extreme precipitation tends to be underestimated in regions and time periods typically characterized by large amounts of convective precipitation. This is shown to be the result of errors in the parameterization of convective precipitation that have been seen in previous model versions. However, comparison against several data sources reveals that model errors in extreme precipitation are approaching the magnitude of the disparity between the reference products. This highlights the existence of large errors in some of the products employed as observations for validation purposes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904490451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904490451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00320.1

DO - 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00320.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904490451

VL - 27

SP - 5219

EP - 5239

JO - Journal of Climate

JF - Journal of Climate

SN - 0894-8755

IS - 14

ER -