Human, AGV or AIV? An integrated framework for material handling system selection with real-world application in an injection molding facility

William Hellmann, Dean Marino, Mohamed Megahed, Merlin Suggs, Jeffrey Borowski, Ashkan Negahban

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Motivated by a real-world material handling system selection problem, this paper proposes a framework that allows for quantifying safety and incorporating it in multi-criteria decision-making processes that involve both quantitative and qualitative measures. In the proposed framework, the results of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) for each alternative are converted into a quantitative measure of total safety and reliability associated with that alternative. A modified analytic hierarchy process (AHP) that differentiates between subjective and objective measures is then used to compare the alternatives at hand. In this modified AHP, experts’ judgments are used for pairwise comparison of alternatives with respect to qualitative measures, while for quantitative criteria, measured or estimated performance is directly used to obtain the required pairwise comparisons. An Excel-based decision support tool that implements the proposed framework is developed and made available online for researchers and practitioners. An application based on a real-world problem in an injection molding facility is also presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)815-824
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Volume101
Issue number1-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 17 2019

Fingerprint

Analytic hierarchy process
Materials handling
Injection molding
Failure modes
Decision making

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Software
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

@article{e62b05444ac3452b923a752579f4b13b,
title = "Human, AGV or AIV? An integrated framework for material handling system selection with real-world application in an injection molding facility",
abstract = "Motivated by a real-world material handling system selection problem, this paper proposes a framework that allows for quantifying safety and incorporating it in multi-criteria decision-making processes that involve both quantitative and qualitative measures. In the proposed framework, the results of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) for each alternative are converted into a quantitative measure of total safety and reliability associated with that alternative. A modified analytic hierarchy process (AHP) that differentiates between subjective and objective measures is then used to compare the alternatives at hand. In this modified AHP, experts’ judgments are used for pairwise comparison of alternatives with respect to qualitative measures, while for quantitative criteria, measured or estimated performance is directly used to obtain the required pairwise comparisons. An Excel-based decision support tool that implements the proposed framework is developed and made available online for researchers and practitioners. An application based on a real-world problem in an injection molding facility is also presented.",
author = "William Hellmann and Dean Marino and Mohamed Megahed and Merlin Suggs and Jeffrey Borowski and Ashkan Negahban",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1007/s00170-018-2958-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "815--824",
journal = "International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology",
issn = "0268-3768",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "1-4",

}

Human, AGV or AIV? An integrated framework for material handling system selection with real-world application in an injection molding facility. / Hellmann, William; Marino, Dean; Megahed, Mohamed; Suggs, Merlin; Borowski, Jeffrey; Negahban, Ashkan.

In: International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 101, No. 1-4, 17.03.2019, p. 815-824.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human, AGV or AIV? An integrated framework for material handling system selection with real-world application in an injection molding facility

AU - Hellmann, William

AU - Marino, Dean

AU - Megahed, Mohamed

AU - Suggs, Merlin

AU - Borowski, Jeffrey

AU - Negahban, Ashkan

PY - 2019/3/17

Y1 - 2019/3/17

N2 - Motivated by a real-world material handling system selection problem, this paper proposes a framework that allows for quantifying safety and incorporating it in multi-criteria decision-making processes that involve both quantitative and qualitative measures. In the proposed framework, the results of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) for each alternative are converted into a quantitative measure of total safety and reliability associated with that alternative. A modified analytic hierarchy process (AHP) that differentiates between subjective and objective measures is then used to compare the alternatives at hand. In this modified AHP, experts’ judgments are used for pairwise comparison of alternatives with respect to qualitative measures, while for quantitative criteria, measured or estimated performance is directly used to obtain the required pairwise comparisons. An Excel-based decision support tool that implements the proposed framework is developed and made available online for researchers and practitioners. An application based on a real-world problem in an injection molding facility is also presented.

AB - Motivated by a real-world material handling system selection problem, this paper proposes a framework that allows for quantifying safety and incorporating it in multi-criteria decision-making processes that involve both quantitative and qualitative measures. In the proposed framework, the results of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) for each alternative are converted into a quantitative measure of total safety and reliability associated with that alternative. A modified analytic hierarchy process (AHP) that differentiates between subjective and objective measures is then used to compare the alternatives at hand. In this modified AHP, experts’ judgments are used for pairwise comparison of alternatives with respect to qualitative measures, while for quantitative criteria, measured or estimated performance is directly used to obtain the required pairwise comparisons. An Excel-based decision support tool that implements the proposed framework is developed and made available online for researchers and practitioners. An application based on a real-world problem in an injection molding facility is also presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056353822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056353822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00170-018-2958-x

DO - 10.1007/s00170-018-2958-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056353822

VL - 101

SP - 815

EP - 824

JO - International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

JF - International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

SN - 0268-3768

IS - 1-4

ER -