Human, Bovine and Porcine Systematic Vascular Input Impedances Are Not Equivalent: Implications for Device Testing and Xenotransplantation in Heart Failure

Steven C. Koenig, Guruprasad A. Giridharan, Daniel L. Ewart, Mark J. Schroeder, Constantine Ionan, Mark S. Slaughter, Michael Sobieski, George M. Pantalos, Robert D. Dowling, Sumanth D. Prabhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Advanced therapies for heart failure (HF), such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and xenotransplantation, are usually tested in bovine and porcine models. This approach assumes a priori that animal (patho)physiology will closely match that of humans. Systemic aortic input impedance (ZART) is an important physiologic determinant of left ventricular (LV) performance. We tested the hypothesis that ZART is lower in bovine and porcine than in humans with normal or failing hearts. Methods: High-fidelity aortic pressure and flow waveforms were recorded intra-operatively at native and paced heart rates of 100 beats per minute (bpm) in adult human patients with normal LV function (n = 13) or end-stage HF (n = 15), and normal calves (n = 10) and pigs (n = 18). Fast Fourier transformation was used to calculate ZART, and arterial resistance and compliance were estimated using a 4-element Windkessel model. Results: Humans with HF had greater ZART than those with normal LV function, characterized by higher resistance (1.16 ± 0.12 vs 1.00 ± 0.10 mm Hg · s/ml, p < 0.05) and lower compliance (1.53 ± 0.21 vs 1.88 ± 0.33 ml · mm Hg, p < 0.05). Healthy calves and pigs had significantly lower resistance (calf: 0.63 ± 0.07 mm Hg · s/ml; pig: 0.90 ± 0.07 mm Hg · s/ml) and higher compliance (calf: 2.79 ± 0.37 ml · mm Hg; pig: 2.80 ± 0.64 ml · mm Hg) when compared to humans (p < 0.05) with normal or failing hearts. Conclusions: ZART is significantly lower in calves and pigs than in humans with or without HF. This finding has important implications for the pre-clinical testing of MCS devices and xenotransplants, which are usually examined in bovine and porcine models, respectively. Specifically, these therapies may respond differently in humans than animals due to non-equivalence of systemic after-load.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1340-1347
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume27
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

Heterologous Transplantation
Electric Impedance
Blood Vessels
Swine
Heart Failure
Equipment and Supplies
Compliance
Left Ventricular Function
Arterial Pressure
Heart Rate
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Koenig, Steven C. ; Giridharan, Guruprasad A. ; Ewart, Daniel L. ; Schroeder, Mark J. ; Ionan, Constantine ; Slaughter, Mark S. ; Sobieski, Michael ; Pantalos, George M. ; Dowling, Robert D. ; Prabhu, Sumanth D. / Human, Bovine and Porcine Systematic Vascular Input Impedances Are Not Equivalent : Implications for Device Testing and Xenotransplantation in Heart Failure. In: Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 2008 ; Vol. 27, No. 12. pp. 1340-1347.
@article{9cea1805586a4d319b6524609e682ce7,
title = "Human, Bovine and Porcine Systematic Vascular Input Impedances Are Not Equivalent: Implications for Device Testing and Xenotransplantation in Heart Failure",
abstract = "Background: Advanced therapies for heart failure (HF), such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and xenotransplantation, are usually tested in bovine and porcine models. This approach assumes a priori that animal (patho)physiology will closely match that of humans. Systemic aortic input impedance (ZART) is an important physiologic determinant of left ventricular (LV) performance. We tested the hypothesis that ZART is lower in bovine and porcine than in humans with normal or failing hearts. Methods: High-fidelity aortic pressure and flow waveforms were recorded intra-operatively at native and paced heart rates of 100 beats per minute (bpm) in adult human patients with normal LV function (n = 13) or end-stage HF (n = 15), and normal calves (n = 10) and pigs (n = 18). Fast Fourier transformation was used to calculate ZART, and arterial resistance and compliance were estimated using a 4-element Windkessel model. Results: Humans with HF had greater ZART than those with normal LV function, characterized by higher resistance (1.16 ± 0.12 vs 1.00 ± 0.10 mm Hg · s/ml, p < 0.05) and lower compliance (1.53 ± 0.21 vs 1.88 ± 0.33 ml · mm Hg, p < 0.05). Healthy calves and pigs had significantly lower resistance (calf: 0.63 ± 0.07 mm Hg · s/ml; pig: 0.90 ± 0.07 mm Hg · s/ml) and higher compliance (calf: 2.79 ± 0.37 ml · mm Hg; pig: 2.80 ± 0.64 ml · mm Hg) when compared to humans (p < 0.05) with normal or failing hearts. Conclusions: ZART is significantly lower in calves and pigs than in humans with or without HF. This finding has important implications for the pre-clinical testing of MCS devices and xenotransplants, which are usually examined in bovine and porcine models, respectively. Specifically, these therapies may respond differently in humans than animals due to non-equivalence of systemic after-load.",
author = "Koenig, {Steven C.} and Giridharan, {Guruprasad A.} and Ewart, {Daniel L.} and Schroeder, {Mark J.} and Constantine Ionan and Slaughter, {Mark S.} and Michael Sobieski and Pantalos, {George M.} and Dowling, {Robert D.} and Prabhu, {Sumanth D.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.healun.2008.08.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1340--1347",
journal = "Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation",
issn = "1053-2498",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "12",

}

Human, Bovine and Porcine Systematic Vascular Input Impedances Are Not Equivalent : Implications for Device Testing and Xenotransplantation in Heart Failure. / Koenig, Steven C.; Giridharan, Guruprasad A.; Ewart, Daniel L.; Schroeder, Mark J.; Ionan, Constantine; Slaughter, Mark S.; Sobieski, Michael; Pantalos, George M.; Dowling, Robert D.; Prabhu, Sumanth D.

In: Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, Vol. 27, No. 12, 01.12.2008, p. 1340-1347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human, Bovine and Porcine Systematic Vascular Input Impedances Are Not Equivalent

T2 - Implications for Device Testing and Xenotransplantation in Heart Failure

AU - Koenig, Steven C.

AU - Giridharan, Guruprasad A.

AU - Ewart, Daniel L.

AU - Schroeder, Mark J.

AU - Ionan, Constantine

AU - Slaughter, Mark S.

AU - Sobieski, Michael

AU - Pantalos, George M.

AU - Dowling, Robert D.

AU - Prabhu, Sumanth D.

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - Background: Advanced therapies for heart failure (HF), such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and xenotransplantation, are usually tested in bovine and porcine models. This approach assumes a priori that animal (patho)physiology will closely match that of humans. Systemic aortic input impedance (ZART) is an important physiologic determinant of left ventricular (LV) performance. We tested the hypothesis that ZART is lower in bovine and porcine than in humans with normal or failing hearts. Methods: High-fidelity aortic pressure and flow waveforms were recorded intra-operatively at native and paced heart rates of 100 beats per minute (bpm) in adult human patients with normal LV function (n = 13) or end-stage HF (n = 15), and normal calves (n = 10) and pigs (n = 18). Fast Fourier transformation was used to calculate ZART, and arterial resistance and compliance were estimated using a 4-element Windkessel model. Results: Humans with HF had greater ZART than those with normal LV function, characterized by higher resistance (1.16 ± 0.12 vs 1.00 ± 0.10 mm Hg · s/ml, p < 0.05) and lower compliance (1.53 ± 0.21 vs 1.88 ± 0.33 ml · mm Hg, p < 0.05). Healthy calves and pigs had significantly lower resistance (calf: 0.63 ± 0.07 mm Hg · s/ml; pig: 0.90 ± 0.07 mm Hg · s/ml) and higher compliance (calf: 2.79 ± 0.37 ml · mm Hg; pig: 2.80 ± 0.64 ml · mm Hg) when compared to humans (p < 0.05) with normal or failing hearts. Conclusions: ZART is significantly lower in calves and pigs than in humans with or without HF. This finding has important implications for the pre-clinical testing of MCS devices and xenotransplants, which are usually examined in bovine and porcine models, respectively. Specifically, these therapies may respond differently in humans than animals due to non-equivalence of systemic after-load.

AB - Background: Advanced therapies for heart failure (HF), such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and xenotransplantation, are usually tested in bovine and porcine models. This approach assumes a priori that animal (patho)physiology will closely match that of humans. Systemic aortic input impedance (ZART) is an important physiologic determinant of left ventricular (LV) performance. We tested the hypothesis that ZART is lower in bovine and porcine than in humans with normal or failing hearts. Methods: High-fidelity aortic pressure and flow waveforms were recorded intra-operatively at native and paced heart rates of 100 beats per minute (bpm) in adult human patients with normal LV function (n = 13) or end-stage HF (n = 15), and normal calves (n = 10) and pigs (n = 18). Fast Fourier transformation was used to calculate ZART, and arterial resistance and compliance were estimated using a 4-element Windkessel model. Results: Humans with HF had greater ZART than those with normal LV function, characterized by higher resistance (1.16 ± 0.12 vs 1.00 ± 0.10 mm Hg · s/ml, p < 0.05) and lower compliance (1.53 ± 0.21 vs 1.88 ± 0.33 ml · mm Hg, p < 0.05). Healthy calves and pigs had significantly lower resistance (calf: 0.63 ± 0.07 mm Hg · s/ml; pig: 0.90 ± 0.07 mm Hg · s/ml) and higher compliance (calf: 2.79 ± 0.37 ml · mm Hg; pig: 2.80 ± 0.64 ml · mm Hg) when compared to humans (p < 0.05) with normal or failing hearts. Conclusions: ZART is significantly lower in calves and pigs than in humans with or without HF. This finding has important implications for the pre-clinical testing of MCS devices and xenotransplants, which are usually examined in bovine and porcine models, respectively. Specifically, these therapies may respond differently in humans than animals due to non-equivalence of systemic after-load.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57049090050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57049090050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.healun.2008.08.009

DO - 10.1016/j.healun.2008.08.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 19059115

AN - SCOPUS:57049090050

VL - 27

SP - 1340

EP - 1347

JO - Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

JF - Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

SN - 1053-2498

IS - 12

ER -