Human conflicts and the food, energy, and water nexus

building collaboration using facilitation and mediation to manage environmental disputes

Lara Burgel Fowler, Xiaoxin Shi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The food, energy, and water nexus represents the interaction of three complicated systems, each of which alone provides plenty of fodder for human conflict. In the USA, environmental laws typically address conflicts arising within each system. For example, the Clean Water Act primarily focuses on controlling end-of-pipe water pollution. However, it is less effective in reducing water pollution from nonpoint sources, which requires intensive collaboration of both public and private entities to address. Sector-based regulatory regimes also have similar limitations in the food and energy systems. Once these three systems are considered together, the implications of policies, plans, and projects on natural resources become difficult to untangle. This paper discusses the benefits and challenges of managing environmental disputes through facilitation and mediation, where a neutral third party is engaged to help design and manage a constructive problem-solving process. An examination of how mediation in particular has been used to address conflicts of different scales in the USA suggests that the use of third-party neutrals should be considered more widely in collaborative efforts to handle conflict at the food, energy, and water nexus. The aid of a neutral third party could greatly enhance the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement and creativity under scientific, legal, and political uncertainties. Dispute resolution processes can also accelerate the creation of productive relationships between citizens, scientists, and non-governmental and governmental agencies to foster innovative and lasting solutions to meet the food, energy, and water needs of the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-122
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

facilitation
mediation
food
energy
water
water pollution
dispute resolution
environmental law
fodder
creativity
aid
natural resources
stakeholder
natural resource
pipe
act
uncertainty
citizen
examination
conflict

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

@article{335e55e435f241c9882008b669933ebe,
title = "Human conflicts and the food, energy, and water nexus: building collaboration using facilitation and mediation to manage environmental disputes",
abstract = "The food, energy, and water nexus represents the interaction of three complicated systems, each of which alone provides plenty of fodder for human conflict. In the USA, environmental laws typically address conflicts arising within each system. For example, the Clean Water Act primarily focuses on controlling end-of-pipe water pollution. However, it is less effective in reducing water pollution from nonpoint sources, which requires intensive collaboration of both public and private entities to address. Sector-based regulatory regimes also have similar limitations in the food and energy systems. Once these three systems are considered together, the implications of policies, plans, and projects on natural resources become difficult to untangle. This paper discusses the benefits and challenges of managing environmental disputes through facilitation and mediation, where a neutral third party is engaged to help design and manage a constructive problem-solving process. An examination of how mediation in particular has been used to address conflicts of different scales in the USA suggests that the use of third-party neutrals should be considered more widely in collaborative efforts to handle conflict at the food, energy, and water nexus. The aid of a neutral third party could greatly enhance the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement and creativity under scientific, legal, and political uncertainties. Dispute resolution processes can also accelerate the creation of productive relationships between citizens, scientists, and non-governmental and governmental agencies to foster innovative and lasting solutions to meet the food, energy, and water needs of the future.",
author = "Fowler, {Lara Burgel} and Xiaoxin Shi",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13412-016-0373-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "104--122",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences",
issn = "2190-6483",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human conflicts and the food, energy, and water nexus

T2 - building collaboration using facilitation and mediation to manage environmental disputes

AU - Fowler, Lara Burgel

AU - Shi, Xiaoxin

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - The food, energy, and water nexus represents the interaction of three complicated systems, each of which alone provides plenty of fodder for human conflict. In the USA, environmental laws typically address conflicts arising within each system. For example, the Clean Water Act primarily focuses on controlling end-of-pipe water pollution. However, it is less effective in reducing water pollution from nonpoint sources, which requires intensive collaboration of both public and private entities to address. Sector-based regulatory regimes also have similar limitations in the food and energy systems. Once these three systems are considered together, the implications of policies, plans, and projects on natural resources become difficult to untangle. This paper discusses the benefits and challenges of managing environmental disputes through facilitation and mediation, where a neutral third party is engaged to help design and manage a constructive problem-solving process. An examination of how mediation in particular has been used to address conflicts of different scales in the USA suggests that the use of third-party neutrals should be considered more widely in collaborative efforts to handle conflict at the food, energy, and water nexus. The aid of a neutral third party could greatly enhance the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement and creativity under scientific, legal, and political uncertainties. Dispute resolution processes can also accelerate the creation of productive relationships between citizens, scientists, and non-governmental and governmental agencies to foster innovative and lasting solutions to meet the food, energy, and water needs of the future.

AB - The food, energy, and water nexus represents the interaction of three complicated systems, each of which alone provides plenty of fodder for human conflict. In the USA, environmental laws typically address conflicts arising within each system. For example, the Clean Water Act primarily focuses on controlling end-of-pipe water pollution. However, it is less effective in reducing water pollution from nonpoint sources, which requires intensive collaboration of both public and private entities to address. Sector-based regulatory regimes also have similar limitations in the food and energy systems. Once these three systems are considered together, the implications of policies, plans, and projects on natural resources become difficult to untangle. This paper discusses the benefits and challenges of managing environmental disputes through facilitation and mediation, where a neutral third party is engaged to help design and manage a constructive problem-solving process. An examination of how mediation in particular has been used to address conflicts of different scales in the USA suggests that the use of third-party neutrals should be considered more widely in collaborative efforts to handle conflict at the food, energy, and water nexus. The aid of a neutral third party could greatly enhance the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement and creativity under scientific, legal, and political uncertainties. Dispute resolution processes can also accelerate the creation of productive relationships between citizens, scientists, and non-governmental and governmental agencies to foster innovative and lasting solutions to meet the food, energy, and water needs of the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977079198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977079198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13412-016-0373-x

DO - 10.1007/s13412-016-0373-x

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 104

EP - 122

JO - Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

JF - Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

SN - 2190-6483

IS - 1

ER -