TY - JOUR
T1 - Human–Animal Chimera
T2 - A Neuro Driven Discussion? Comparison of Three Leading European Research Countries
AU - Cabrera Trujillo, Laura Yenisa
AU - Engel-Glatter, Sabrina
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the Brocher Foundation for supporting the writing of this paper through their visiting fellowship program. We would also like to thank the insightful comments and suggestions of our blind reviewers.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
PY - 2015/3/29
Y1 - 2015/3/29
N2 - Research with human–animal chimera raises a number of ethical concerns, especially when neural stem cells are transplanted into the brains of non-human primates (NHPs). Besides animal welfare concerns and ethical issues associated with the use of embryonic stem cells, the research is also regarded as controversial from the standpoint of NHPs developing cognitive or behavioural capabilities that are regarded as “unique” to humans. However, scientists are urging to test new therapeutic approaches for neurological diseases in primate models as they better mimic human physiology than all current animal models. As a response, various countries have issued reports on the topic. Our paper summarizes the ethical issues raised by research with human–animal brain chimeras and compares the relevant regulatory instruments and different recommendations issued in national reports from three important European research nations: Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. We assess and discuss the focus and priorities set by the different reports, review various reasons for and perspectives on the importance of the brain in chimera research, and identify critical points in the reports that warrant further specification and debate.
AB - Research with human–animal chimera raises a number of ethical concerns, especially when neural stem cells are transplanted into the brains of non-human primates (NHPs). Besides animal welfare concerns and ethical issues associated with the use of embryonic stem cells, the research is also regarded as controversial from the standpoint of NHPs developing cognitive or behavioural capabilities that are regarded as “unique” to humans. However, scientists are urging to test new therapeutic approaches for neurological diseases in primate models as they better mimic human physiology than all current animal models. As a response, various countries have issued reports on the topic. Our paper summarizes the ethical issues raised by research with human–animal brain chimeras and compares the relevant regulatory instruments and different recommendations issued in national reports from three important European research nations: Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. We assess and discuss the focus and priorities set by the different reports, review various reasons for and perspectives on the importance of the brain in chimera research, and identify critical points in the reports that warrant further specification and debate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939891521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939891521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11948-014-9556-6
DO - 10.1007/s11948-014-9556-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 24891129
AN - SCOPUS:84939891521
SN - 1353-3452
VL - 21
SP - 595
EP - 617
JO - Science and Engineering Ethics
JF - Science and Engineering Ethics
IS - 3
ER -