Hurricane Katrina

Who Stayed and Why?

Brian Clemens Thiede, David L. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper contributes to the growing body of social science research on population displacement from disasters by examining the social determinants of evacuation behavior. It seeks to clarify the effects of race and socioeconomic status on evacuation outcomes vis-a-vis previous research on Hurricane Katrina, and it expands upon prior research on evacuation behavior more generally by differentiating non-evacuees according to their reasons for staying. This research draws upon the Harvard Medical School Hurricane Katrina Community Advisory Group's 2006 survey of individuals affected by Hurricane Katrina. Using these data, we develop two series of logistic regression models. The first set of models predicts the odds that respondents evacuated prior to the storm, relative to delayed- or non-evacuation; the second group of models predicts the odds that non-evacuees were unable to evacuate relative to having chosen to stay. We find that black and low-education respondents were least likely to evacuate prior to the storm and among non-evacuees, most likely to have been unable to evacuate. Respondents' social networks, information attainment, and geographic location also affected evacuation behavior. We discuss these findings and outline directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)803-824
Number of pages22
JournalPopulation Research and Policy Review
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Fingerprint

hurricane
socioeconomic status
social network
social status
disaster
Group
social science
logistics
determinants
regression
education
school
community

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Demography
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{2899900027344486b6c969de36e62ff3,
title = "Hurricane Katrina: Who Stayed and Why?",
abstract = "This paper contributes to the growing body of social science research on population displacement from disasters by examining the social determinants of evacuation behavior. It seeks to clarify the effects of race and socioeconomic status on evacuation outcomes vis-a-vis previous research on Hurricane Katrina, and it expands upon prior research on evacuation behavior more generally by differentiating non-evacuees according to their reasons for staying. This research draws upon the Harvard Medical School Hurricane Katrina Community Advisory Group's 2006 survey of individuals affected by Hurricane Katrina. Using these data, we develop two series of logistic regression models. The first set of models predicts the odds that respondents evacuated prior to the storm, relative to delayed- or non-evacuation; the second group of models predicts the odds that non-evacuees were unable to evacuate relative to having chosen to stay. We find that black and low-education respondents were least likely to evacuate prior to the storm and among non-evacuees, most likely to have been unable to evacuate. Respondents' social networks, information attainment, and geographic location also affected evacuation behavior. We discuss these findings and outline directions for future research.",
author = "Thiede, {Brian Clemens} and Brown, {David L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11113-013-9302-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "803--824",
journal = "Population Research and Policy Review",
issn = "0167-5923",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

Hurricane Katrina : Who Stayed and Why? / Thiede, Brian Clemens; Brown, David L.

In: Population Research and Policy Review, Vol. 32, No. 6, 01.12.2013, p. 803-824.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hurricane Katrina

T2 - Who Stayed and Why?

AU - Thiede, Brian Clemens

AU - Brown, David L.

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - This paper contributes to the growing body of social science research on population displacement from disasters by examining the social determinants of evacuation behavior. It seeks to clarify the effects of race and socioeconomic status on evacuation outcomes vis-a-vis previous research on Hurricane Katrina, and it expands upon prior research on evacuation behavior more generally by differentiating non-evacuees according to their reasons for staying. This research draws upon the Harvard Medical School Hurricane Katrina Community Advisory Group's 2006 survey of individuals affected by Hurricane Katrina. Using these data, we develop two series of logistic regression models. The first set of models predicts the odds that respondents evacuated prior to the storm, relative to delayed- or non-evacuation; the second group of models predicts the odds that non-evacuees were unable to evacuate relative to having chosen to stay. We find that black and low-education respondents were least likely to evacuate prior to the storm and among non-evacuees, most likely to have been unable to evacuate. Respondents' social networks, information attainment, and geographic location also affected evacuation behavior. We discuss these findings and outline directions for future research.

AB - This paper contributes to the growing body of social science research on population displacement from disasters by examining the social determinants of evacuation behavior. It seeks to clarify the effects of race and socioeconomic status on evacuation outcomes vis-a-vis previous research on Hurricane Katrina, and it expands upon prior research on evacuation behavior more generally by differentiating non-evacuees according to their reasons for staying. This research draws upon the Harvard Medical School Hurricane Katrina Community Advisory Group's 2006 survey of individuals affected by Hurricane Katrina. Using these data, we develop two series of logistic regression models. The first set of models predicts the odds that respondents evacuated prior to the storm, relative to delayed- or non-evacuation; the second group of models predicts the odds that non-evacuees were unable to evacuate relative to having chosen to stay. We find that black and low-education respondents were least likely to evacuate prior to the storm and among non-evacuees, most likely to have been unable to evacuate. Respondents' social networks, information attainment, and geographic location also affected evacuation behavior. We discuss these findings and outline directions for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888044638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888044638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11113-013-9302-9

DO - 10.1007/s11113-013-9302-9

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 803

EP - 824

JO - Population Research and Policy Review

JF - Population Research and Policy Review

SN - 0167-5923

IS - 6

ER -