Hybrid manufacturing—Locating AM hubs using a two-stage facility location approach

Danielle Strong, Michael Kay, Brett Conner, Thomas Wakefield, Guhaprasanna Manogharan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Hybrid Manufacturing is defined as the integration of Additive Manufacturing (AM), specifically metal AM, with traditional manufacturing post-processing such as heat treatment and machining. Hybrid AM enables Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) who can offer post-processing services to integrate into the growing AM supply chain. Most near-net metal AM parts require heat treatment processes (e.g. residual stress relieving/annealing) before machining to achieve final engineering specification. This research investigates a two-stage facility model to optimize the locations and capacities for new metal AM hubs which require two sequential post-processing services: heat treatment and machining. Using North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) data for machine shops and heat treatment facilities in the U.S., a p-median location model is used to determine the optimal locations for AM hub centers based on: (1) geographical data, (2) demand and (3) fixed and operational costs of hybrid-AM processing. Results from this study have identified: (a) candidate US counties to locate metal AM hubs, (b) total cost (fixed, operational and transportation), (c) capacity utilization of the AM hubs and (d) demand assignments across machine shops – heat treatment facilities – AM hubs. It was found that 2-stage p-Median model identified 22 A M hub locations as the initial sites for AM hubs which grows to 35 A M hubs as demand increases. It was also found that relatively fewer number of heat treatment facilities than machine shops resulted in a more concentrated locations of AM hubs. In addition, transportation costs were not adversely affected by the inclusion of as-build plates and showed that including heat treatment facilities as part of the hybrid AM supply chain will be mutually beneficial to all stakeholders of metal hybrid AM supply chain, i.e. AM → Heat treatment → Machining.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)469-476
Number of pages8
JournalAdditive Manufacturing
Volume25
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

3D printers
Heat treatment
Machine shops
Metals
Machining
Supply chains
Processing
Costs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Strong, Danielle ; Kay, Michael ; Conner, Brett ; Wakefield, Thomas ; Manogharan, Guhaprasanna. / Hybrid manufacturing—Locating AM hubs using a two-stage facility location approach. In: Additive Manufacturing. 2019 ; Vol. 25. pp. 469-476.
@article{7924a098383c417e9fd9807fd6b64788,
title = "Hybrid manufacturing—Locating AM hubs using a two-stage facility location approach",
abstract = "Hybrid Manufacturing is defined as the integration of Additive Manufacturing (AM), specifically metal AM, with traditional manufacturing post-processing such as heat treatment and machining. Hybrid AM enables Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) who can offer post-processing services to integrate into the growing AM supply chain. Most near-net metal AM parts require heat treatment processes (e.g. residual stress relieving/annealing) before machining to achieve final engineering specification. This research investigates a two-stage facility model to optimize the locations and capacities for new metal AM hubs which require two sequential post-processing services: heat treatment and machining. Using North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) data for machine shops and heat treatment facilities in the U.S., a p-median location model is used to determine the optimal locations for AM hub centers based on: (1) geographical data, (2) demand and (3) fixed and operational costs of hybrid-AM processing. Results from this study have identified: (a) candidate US counties to locate metal AM hubs, (b) total cost (fixed, operational and transportation), (c) capacity utilization of the AM hubs and (d) demand assignments across machine shops – heat treatment facilities – AM hubs. It was found that 2-stage p-Median model identified 22 A M hub locations as the initial sites for AM hubs which grows to 35 A M hubs as demand increases. It was also found that relatively fewer number of heat treatment facilities than machine shops resulted in a more concentrated locations of AM hubs. In addition, transportation costs were not adversely affected by the inclusion of as-build plates and showed that including heat treatment facilities as part of the hybrid AM supply chain will be mutually beneficial to all stakeholders of metal hybrid AM supply chain, i.e. AM → Heat treatment → Machining.",
author = "Danielle Strong and Michael Kay and Brett Conner and Thomas Wakefield and Guhaprasanna Manogharan",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "469--476",
journal = "Additive Manufacturing",
issn = "2214-8604",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Hybrid manufacturing—Locating AM hubs using a two-stage facility location approach. / Strong, Danielle; Kay, Michael; Conner, Brett; Wakefield, Thomas; Manogharan, Guhaprasanna.

In: Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 25, 01.01.2019, p. 469-476.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hybrid manufacturing—Locating AM hubs using a two-stage facility location approach

AU - Strong, Danielle

AU - Kay, Michael

AU - Conner, Brett

AU - Wakefield, Thomas

AU - Manogharan, Guhaprasanna

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Hybrid Manufacturing is defined as the integration of Additive Manufacturing (AM), specifically metal AM, with traditional manufacturing post-processing such as heat treatment and machining. Hybrid AM enables Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) who can offer post-processing services to integrate into the growing AM supply chain. Most near-net metal AM parts require heat treatment processes (e.g. residual stress relieving/annealing) before machining to achieve final engineering specification. This research investigates a two-stage facility model to optimize the locations and capacities for new metal AM hubs which require two sequential post-processing services: heat treatment and machining. Using North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) data for machine shops and heat treatment facilities in the U.S., a p-median location model is used to determine the optimal locations for AM hub centers based on: (1) geographical data, (2) demand and (3) fixed and operational costs of hybrid-AM processing. Results from this study have identified: (a) candidate US counties to locate metal AM hubs, (b) total cost (fixed, operational and transportation), (c) capacity utilization of the AM hubs and (d) demand assignments across machine shops – heat treatment facilities – AM hubs. It was found that 2-stage p-Median model identified 22 A M hub locations as the initial sites for AM hubs which grows to 35 A M hubs as demand increases. It was also found that relatively fewer number of heat treatment facilities than machine shops resulted in a more concentrated locations of AM hubs. In addition, transportation costs were not adversely affected by the inclusion of as-build plates and showed that including heat treatment facilities as part of the hybrid AM supply chain will be mutually beneficial to all stakeholders of metal hybrid AM supply chain, i.e. AM → Heat treatment → Machining.

AB - Hybrid Manufacturing is defined as the integration of Additive Manufacturing (AM), specifically metal AM, with traditional manufacturing post-processing such as heat treatment and machining. Hybrid AM enables Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) who can offer post-processing services to integrate into the growing AM supply chain. Most near-net metal AM parts require heat treatment processes (e.g. residual stress relieving/annealing) before machining to achieve final engineering specification. This research investigates a two-stage facility model to optimize the locations and capacities for new metal AM hubs which require two sequential post-processing services: heat treatment and machining. Using North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) data for machine shops and heat treatment facilities in the U.S., a p-median location model is used to determine the optimal locations for AM hub centers based on: (1) geographical data, (2) demand and (3) fixed and operational costs of hybrid-AM processing. Results from this study have identified: (a) candidate US counties to locate metal AM hubs, (b) total cost (fixed, operational and transportation), (c) capacity utilization of the AM hubs and (d) demand assignments across machine shops – heat treatment facilities – AM hubs. It was found that 2-stage p-Median model identified 22 A M hub locations as the initial sites for AM hubs which grows to 35 A M hubs as demand increases. It was also found that relatively fewer number of heat treatment facilities than machine shops resulted in a more concentrated locations of AM hubs. In addition, transportation costs were not adversely affected by the inclusion of as-build plates and showed that including heat treatment facilities as part of the hybrid AM supply chain will be mutually beneficial to all stakeholders of metal hybrid AM supply chain, i.e. AM → Heat treatment → Machining.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057602529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057602529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.027

DO - 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.027

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85057602529

VL - 25

SP - 469

EP - 476

JO - Additive Manufacturing

JF - Additive Manufacturing

SN - 2214-8604

ER -